It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Dermo
Pirating Movies IS STEALING! Same with music and software..
Originally posted by Raist
So if I use my DVR to record a movie and then burn it to DVD is that illegal? I mean after all the satellite/cable company sent the feed to my home right? I paid for their service didn’t I? If it is then why make that technology so easily available?
Originally posted by Merriman Weir
Originally posted by Dermo
Pirating Movies IS STEALING! Same with music and software..
Can you expand on this as whilst I understand what you're trying to say, I'm unsure how it's actually "stealing"?
Stealing is defined as the taking of someone else's property without their consent. I mentioned the English law's take on this above.
Originally posted by Dermo
And copyrighted material is not property of the owner/licensee?
Am I missing something here? Because I do own an Indie label and if what you say is true, then I might as well start ripping off as many of my artists as possible seeing as its not actually 'Stealing' because its not their "property".
There's no point in trying to be smart with a play on words about how 'Theft' and 'Stealing' are not completely legally associated with the actual process of sharing copyright for personal gain, be it profit or emotional, without the consent of the copyright holder or licensee.
If the artist/producer/director doesn't mind their copyrighted material being shared, and many don't, including myself in many cases, then thats fine.
But there's no point in harping on about how its your or anyone else's "Right" to illegally view, listen to or share copyrighted material that has been created by a individual hardworking or otherwise.
Because that IMO is absolute bull#.
I understand 110% that we have been ripped off by constant markups by middlemen from Producers to distributors to Shop owners and marketers while huge amounts of money is still wastefully thrown at the creation and marketing of the product when it could easily be made at 100th the price and directly sold/internet marketed.
BUT right now you can get your music and films for a fraction of the price by buying them online..
So you argument about being ripped off has no substance..
especially when the people who rip off the copyrighted music don't discern between the Major companies who have been ripping them off over the past few decades and the Indie companies who are the backbone of local talent.
Also, the fact that while the Internet is allowing for cheaper marketing and easier exposure, it still doesn't allow for a decent income from the end product because the infrastructure isn't there to allow for it. So as i said above, there will soon be a period where if noone pays for their media, and the infrastructure isn't there to allow for more dynamic advertising (revenue) for instance, there will be a dip in quality of product and a stagnation of the industry..
This is why people must be forced to pay for some, if even a hundredth, of the music/films they download in order to keep liquidity in the industry.
[edit on 9/10/09 by Dermo]
Originally posted by Dermo
reply to post by v3_exceed
Also.. If DHL or FedEx was shipping illegal drugs or stolen property from one generic person to another.. do you not think the responsibility would fall on them to ensure they cut down on as much of the activity as possible?
Yes!