reply to post by burntheships
I read a lot of books, magazines, articles in newspapers, you name it.
It all depends on what catches my particular attention at the time.
I have only been studying this entire thing all of my life in various aspects.
That many people cannot see what is right in front of their faces scares the Hell out of me when it comes to this because each and every one of those
pictures I got from various websites having to do with the R.F.I.D. chip, bio-chip (Verichip/Digital Angel - which is the high-end R.F.I.D. chip), and
as well the entire system has been set up for decades and staring people right in their faces each and every time they go to the grocery store and
check out with the cashier.
The barcode is equal to the R.F.I.D. chip through inventory control, a running Census, if you will, of what food is being purchased, so they can track
the trending of money spent, items purchased, and as well with those devices called EAS the theft, which can all be linked back to the bio-chip
because when it is implemented we all become inventory, and a constant running Census will be done, corroborating with those devices, where our
location is, what we have spent our money on, how much we have spent, and as well our travel patterns, called in animal tracking, herd migration.
Each and every piece of what I have said can be corroborated, elaborated on, and as well gone even farther in depth on because it is a part of the
system that
Ted Kaczynski was trying to shut down, called
connectivity.
Quote from : Wikipedia : Ted Kaczynski
Theodore John Kaczynski (pronounced /kəˈzɪnski/; born May 22, 1942), also known as the Unabomber (University and Airline Bomber), is an American
mathematician, social critic, and murderer who carried out a campaign of mail bombings, as well as a described anarcho-primitivist.
David Gelernter (one of the Unabomber's victims) was speaking about the connectivity of the
soon to be coming Internet, public use was not out at the time except for select individuals (my family were Beta-Testers, I have been online for
twenty years plus).
Mirror Worlds: or the Day Software Puts the
Universe in a Shoebox...How It Will Happen and What It Will Mean
Amazon Review :
Within ten years, Gelernter (Computer Science/Yale) predicts here, scientists will deploy computer systems able to capture extensive data about a
particular "reality'' (hospital, city, etc.), and to present a constantly updated model on a desktop computer.
"A Mirror World is some huge institution's moving, true-to- life mirror image trapped inside a computer--where you can see and grasp it whole,''
Gelernter writes.
Citizens will be able to visit these computer models like public squares, gaining unprecedented access to data on what's going on (and the officials
in charge, the author intimates, will presumably welcome a chance to have their performance monitored).
Building such mirror worlds will be extraordinarily difficult: streams and rivers of raw data need to be constantly flowing; thousands of computers
must process the data in parallel fashion; and tying it all together will demand new kinds of software of immense complexity.
Gelernter explains clearly the problems to be solved and describes pieces of the technology already working in research labs.
Left unchallenged is his assumption that such technology will remain benign--giving honest folk a way of grasping an ever-more complex world instead
of providing the powerful owners of such technology a superb way to distort and control "reality.''
Plausible but potentially frightening view of what the future could hold if those who view "reality'' as merely a vast array of numbers waiting to
be crunched have their way.
(Twenty illustrations--not seen.) -- Copyright ©1991, Kirkus Associates, LP. All rights reserved. --This text refers to an out of print or
unavailable edition of this title.
Just to clarify for those reading this particular thread and any and all subsequent ones herein not yet outlined, I am not advocating violence through
bombing, nor am I condoning the actions of Theodore Kaczynski, and what I see as his mad bombing attacks on innocent victims who were just doing their
jobs, research, and whatever else they were doing. The man's actions are some of the most heinous and contemptibly damning things he could have ever
done to anyone despite the intent behind the actions, he could have very easily gone another route and instead of intimidation through illegal actions
spoken out verbally through speeches and or proved his theories since he was a mathematician of what I have conjectured here were his reasoning behind
the actions of committing to the course he undertook.
Nor am I promoting or condoning anarchism in any way, shape, or form.
[edit on 9-10-2009 by SpartanKingLeonidas]