reply to post by Pathos
alright folks still reading, would anyone like to know why six is "etc."? Because to go beyond this point should p. really have anything, and not
just regurgitating current events, then it would be to boring. The beauty in ending it with etc. is A.) it makes it shorter. B.) it gives a false
illusion of a learned/educated Person.(to "read", or "see" that takes observation) C.) using B it gives p. a since of empowerment over many who
are too afraid to question; in fear more is to come.
People forget the little things. I don't. I can tell a lot about a person by looking at their environment. While most people only observe the
conditions of a person's home, I observe the items that are laying around. Photos, type of plants, wallpapers, color of paint, etc... I am able to
learn a lot about a person within the first ten minutes.
I was trained to do so.
When I go into a job interview, I look for sculptures and other art pieces. I am able to tell how a person thinks by the type of art they own. I can
also tell you exactly where, when, why, and how the piece was created. I can also tell what a society was like around the artist.
I was trained to observe.
What good sales Person wasn't trained in what P. mentioned above?
When people post in these forums (and others), they dismiss the origin of the person who is replying. Why? Knowing a person's age, education, and
environment reflects their answers. As a result of not being observant online, life in some nations has become a wreak.
Okay, folks, We went from hearing the origins in P's opinion of why the Internet was bad, and now should We examine word for word, or scrutinize what
P. wrote, then We can see a few things. P. laid out his superiority; which is a technique used to gain the illusion of the upper hand. Notice how he
laid out rat droppings of how he was "trained", and the mechanisms needed for job "X" which wasn't mentioned. What P. was doing was creating an
illusion of mystery, and at the same time of "all knowing", or at the least of being on the "inside"........ 'Cause P. was
Now, assuming that P. might possibly have meant We don't know the personality of a Nat, or that of a low paid low educated govt. subversive, then
well, P. might have some of us. I donno, but what is clear are the techniques he's using, and they are LOW level.
Example: Socialism is a historical keystone in the progression towards communism. As a result of several of our young US citizens being exposed to
those who live in socialism, (foreigners who were brought up thinking it is acceptable), our own citizens are now moving towards it. They are
dismissing the historical aspect of its usage. Thanks to the World Wide Web.
Arg, I've got about a page of crap sandwich I could write out, but I know most that read my stuff KNOW I mean it, and many have seen me page, after
page, after page do it....... I won't.
Now, the difference between what P. did, and what I wrote just above in my last response is that People here really know that I'll do just that. P
has no proof, and didn't I hope convince anyone. Do ya'll see the difference?
Oh, and to address exactly what he laid out in the last quoted material? He is expressing what most would hear watching Fox Noise. It is a NEOCON
organization; which gets it's affiliates directly from the Nazis out of Germany.
Beyond that, the governmental system in the US has bordered, or been Socialist in many regards for a long while.
What it has been more than Socialist is Corporatist. Now that falls under the heading of Fascism, and what does fascism need to flourish? Well the
truth is the biggest enemy of a fascist state; so it must silence any form of the truth.