180 Deg Slip/Strike Eq in SoCal???, page 9
Pages: <<  6    7    8    9    10  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 47 times


reply posted on 5-10-2009 @ 03:47 PM by Hx3_1963
reply to post by TrueAmerican

2.1 2009/10/05 13:47:20 36.399N 117.843W 0.4 10 km ( 6 mi) SSE of Keeler, CA

Well this news of the station takes considerable wind out of my ~sail~ , but, I did see the occasional same out of phase movements at the other two stations (MPM & TIN)...be it at lessor values...Hmmm...seems yer call is the correct one...thanks fer all yer input on this!

I guess there will be no way to really confirm the slip/strike theory, now that the station is ~contaminated~ (not to be trusted)

I guess I should of did that first, what you did later, and called Caltech for confirmation of that stations status before starting this thread...

Edit: Seems they took CWC down around 5:00 pm est?

If nothing else, this was a good learning experience and brought this swarm up for discussion...sorry folks fer Gloomin' & Doomin' Y'all...

I guess it's back to the Quake Watch 2009 thread to keep tabs on Samoa/Sumatra/Tonga...

Quake Watch 2009
www.abovetopsecret.com...

[edit on 10/5/2009 by Hx3_1963]



reply posted on 5-10-2009 @ 05:40 PM by Cydonia2012
reply to post by Hx3_1963



Thanks of the info but we need it in a language we will undertand, this means nothing to us except to get us worried. S+F though


.... Nevermind... Strange, I couldn't see the other pages, just the 1st one... Now I see and understand. Thx again.

[edit on 5-10-2009 by Cydonia2012]


reply posted on 5-10-2009 @ 07:42 PM by hoghead cheese
Originally posted by Hx3_1963
Here's an example of a slip fault...





If been noticing alot of earthquakes and after reading your information it may be true. We are seeing alot of these and they seem to be following a line just as you said. I hope it doesn't hit North America, but I think it will.


reply posted on 5-10-2009 @ 07:44 PM by Hx3_1963
Hmmm...

Nope...if they had a Tech at the site they gave up

Now that it's back to minor readings, I still see the inversion

2.5 2009/10/05 17:44:34 36.392N 117.854W 4.0 11 km ( 7 mi) S of Keeler, CA

Now that was cool...watching a 5.3 from Pacific Rise on CWC/TIN/MPM

Edit: ...Enough to set off a small ones on CWC

quake.usgs.gov...

map 2.1 2009/10/05 19:53:43 32.724N 115.842W 1.3 15 km ( 9 mi) E of Ocotillo, CA
map 2.8 2009/10/05 19:51:12 32.716N 115.849W 0.8 14 km ( 9 mi) E of Ocotillo, CA
map 2.1 2009/10/05 19:46:56 32.684N 115.831W 4.2 17 km (10 mi) ESE of Ocotillo, CA
map 1.5 2009/10/05 19:46:00 36.377N 117.861W 5.6 12 km ( 8 mi) S of Keeler, CA
map 2.0 2009/10/05 19:36:54 36.394N 117.873W 6.1 10 km ( 6 mi) S of Keeler, CA
map 2.1 2009/10/05 19:34:03 39.813N 123.213W 5.0 4 km ( 2 mi) ENE of Covelo, CA
map 1.4 2009/10/05 19:09:46 32.715N 115.798W 2.0 13 km ( 8 mi) SW of Seeley, CA
map 1.4 2009/10/05 18:46:32 32.732N 115.847W 2.4 14 km ( 9 mi) E of Ocotillo, CA
map 1.0 2009/10/05 18:22:34 36.909N 115.579W 2.0 39 km (24 mi) NNE of Indian Springs, NV
map 1.1 2009/10/05 18:21:10 32.728N 115.847W 3.8 14 km ( 9 mi) E of Ocotillo, CA
map 1.0 2009/10/05 18:09:50 37.392N 117.003W 0.0 25 km (15 mi) ENE of Tokop, NV

[edit on 10/5/2009 by Hx3_1963]


reply posted on 5-10-2009 @ 10:01 PM by abecedarian
Originally posted by kaskade
if you LIVE in california, what should you do/prepare? i think thats the most basic question EVERYONE IS TRYING TO ASK.
what could happeN? what should we expect? not a bunch of new numbers that 90% dont understand.

DOES NO ONE READ the pages and pages of people still asking the SAME QUESTION
IF you live anywhere near any area where natural 'disasters' may occur, including earthquake, flood, hurricane, tornado, etc...
you should
... make sure your 'disaster' rations will be accessible if that disaster occurs. So, basement storage might not be a good idea (if the house collapses), above ground might not be a good idea (if the tornado ...)... I'm sure you get the idea. So ONE stash may not be a good idea- redundancy / back-ups are a good idea. Some in the basement, some in the car, some in the shed out back, maybe some in the attic (I live in Cali so we have earthquakes and the attic is the last thing to hit the ground .)
... have sufficient fresh, potable / drinking (not distilled) water to last you and your family for 3 days minimum. You should seriously consider having enough potable water on hand to last 2 weeks.
... have non-perishible food-stuffs such as jerky and canned vegetables.
... have dried items such as beans, rice, pasta and the like may be advisable to have on hand but remember to have additional fresh water available for their use on top of the basic water needs. Distilled water is fine for use for these items.
... have iodized salt and multi-vitamin supplements on hand as well as aspirin, motrin, etc., and bandages and rubbing alcohol, as well as any medications you or your family may need such as inhalers (albuterol, etc.) and such.
... blankets and sleeping bags. Not just one or two blankets, but several blankets of varying thickness from 'sheet' to 'thermal' to "full-blown, keep you warm in a blizzard".
... have a wrench to turn off your gas and water mains easily accessible.
... have an AM/FM radio and batteries for it AND buy a FRS/GMRS walkie-talkie setup and have several sets of batteries (at least enough to allow for 5 battery changes) for it too.


reply posted on 5-10-2009 @ 10:36 PM by Hx3_1963
And it continues...that 5.3 Pacific Rise Quake woke 'er up!

quake.usgs.gov...

map 1.6 2009/10/05 20:58:57 36.396N 117.879W 4.0 10 km ( 6 mi) S of Keeler, CA
map 1.7 2009/10/05 20:48:33 36.396N 117.880W 6.1 10 km ( 6 mi) S of Keeler, CA
map 1.3 2009/10/05 20:38:31 34.807N 116.292W 6.5 15 km (10 mi) NW of Ludlow, CA
map 2.7 2009/10/05 20:24:47 36.401N 117.857W 3.1 10 km ( 6 mi) S of Keeler, CA
map 1.4 2009/10/05 20:08:58 38.822N 122.762W 1.8 4 km ( 2 mi) WSW of Cobb, CA
map 1.1 2009/10/05 19:57:35 35.555N 117.369W 10.5 23 km (15 mi) S of Searles Valley, CA

[edit on 10/5/2009 by Hx3_1963]


reply posted on 5-10-2009 @ 11:16 PM by undo
reply to post by abecedarian



coso volcanic field is just south of owens lake.
it's had a few eqs in the last week


reply posted on 6-10-2009 @ 10:14 AM by nydsdan
Originally posted by abecedarian
Some info on a large quake in the area:
1872 Lone Pine Earthquake
The Great Lone Pine earthquake was one of the largest earthquakes to hit California in recorded history. The quake struck on March 26, 1872 and its epicenter was near Lone Pine, California in Owens Valley. The true size of this earthquake is not known, but historical evidence detailing the damage it caused in settlements and landforms near the epicenter, and the geographic extent to which noticeable movement was felt, leads researchers to estimate a Richter magnitude of 7.6 to 8 or greater — similar in size to the 1906 San Francisco earthquake.
...
The quake resulted from sudden vertical (15-20 feet) and right-lateral (35-40 feet) movement on the Lone Pine Fault and part of the Owens Valley Fault. These faults are part of a twin system of normal faults that run along the base of two parallel mountain ranges; the Sierra Nevada on the west and Inyo Mountains on the east flank of Owens Valley.
...
Researchers later estimated that similar earthquakes occur on the Lone Pine fault every 3,000-4,000 years. However, the Lone Pine fault is only one of many faults on two parallel systems of faults mentioned above.


Lone Pine is within 20-30 miles N to NNE of the epicenters of the recent swarm.

[edit on 10/4/2009 by abecedarian]


That quake occurred 2 days after a full moon too.


reply posted on 6-10-2009 @ 12:40 PM by Hx3_1963
reply to post by Hx3_1963

On and on and on...(and I can't access GEE...off-line data base?)

1.7 2009/10/06 11:10:20 36.410N 117.845W 1.2 9 km ( 6 mi) SSE of Keeler, CA
4.1 2009/10/06 11:06:34 36.419N 117.851W 0.2 8 km ( 5 mi) SSE of Keeler, CA
1.4 2009/10/06 11:01:45 35.939N 117.174W 7.0 26 km (16 mi) NE of Trona, CA
2.1 2009/10/06 10:40:39 36.415N 117.874W 2.3 8 km ( 5 mi) S of Keeler, CA
2.0 2009/10/06 10:26:16 36.419N 117.850W 3.0 8 km ( 5 mi) SSE of Keeler, CA
2.1 2009/10/06 10:16:57 36.388N 117.875W 5.2 11 km ( 7 mi) S of Keeler, CA
2.5 2009/10/06 09:32:30 36.411N 117.843W 5.7 9 km ( 6 mi) SSE of Keeler, CA
2.6 2009/10/06 09:31:15 36.408N 117.874W 4.1 9 km ( 6 mi) S of Keeler, CA
1.9 2009/10/06 08:00:51 36.381N 117.874W 1.7 12 km ( 7 mi) S of Keeler, CA
1.6 2009/10/06 05:31:24 36.389N 117.858W 3.5 11 km ( 7 mi) S of Keeler, CA
1.8 2009/10/06 04:47:26 36.395N 117.859W 0.4 10 km ( 6 mi) S of Keeler, CA
1.5 2009/10/06 01:23:46 36.398N 117.871W 5.1 10 km ( 6 mi) S of Keeler, CA
1.7 2009/10/06 00:51:21 36.404N 117.872W 2.1 9 km ( 6 mi) S of Keeler, CA
1.4 2009/10/05 22:08:27 36.382N 117.855W 5.7 12 km ( 7 mi) S of Keeler, CA

[edit on 10/6/2009 by Hx3_1963]


reply posted on 6-10-2009 @ 01:33 PM by Hx3_1963
reply to post by Shirakawa

Yeah we'd of been OMG'in even more than we already were...

I probably need to do some kind of re-start on my systems...

I've been hammering it pretty hard the past couple of days!

That 4.1M showed nice on that link you provided!

A revision:

1.4 2009/10/06 11:48:09 35.051N 118.324W 0.0 13 km ( 8 mi) WNW of Mojave, CA
1.7 2009/10/06 11:10:20 36.410N 117.836W 1.9 9 km ( 6 mi) SSE of Keeler, CA
4.0 2009/10/06 11:06:34 36.414N 117.836W 1.6 9 km ( 5 mi) SSE of Keeler, CA

[edit on 10/6/2009 by Hx3_1963]


reply posted on 7-10-2009 @ 02:18 AM by Hx3_1963
reply to post by TrueAmerican

Yep...one fer the home team there

A fault in a quad channel differential op amp input would do it

Operational Amplifiers:
www.bcae1.com...
(see OP AMP Inverters section for similar display)

OP AMP Error Correction:

An op amp is commonly used in a circuit where error correction is required. Op amps can't (generally) supply a large amount of current at its output. If a signal is fed to the positive input of an op amp and the op amp is driving a circuit which CAN supply a large amount of current (like the regulator that we will work with later on this page), the output of the whole system can be fed back into the negative input of the op amp. This will allow the op amp to compare the output (of the whole system) to the input signal and correct as needed. If the op amp is used in a circuit which needs little current at its output, the op amp can still monitor the output and correct as needed.

It was a fascinating swarm none the less and deserved some attention...

[edit on 10/7/2009 by Hx3_1963]
Pages: <<  6    7    8    9    10  >>    ^^TOP^^



An unusual tree called Jaboticaba
  Posted 7 days ago with 77 member flags
Haunting pics of abandoned cities around the world
  Posted 2 days ago with 63 member flags
Strange Sounds (UK) published on youtube on 5/13/2012
  Posted 15 days ago with 53 member flags
Pole Shift Data You Shouldn\'t Ignore
  Posted 12 days ago with 46 member flags
Indian state says it\'s OK now to kill tiger poachers on sight
  Posted 4 days ago with 41 member flags