It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Then what is your point? The thread title is not "all cops bad."
How could he have been decent?
The incident took place in the early-morning hours of Saturday, when Officer Ard spotted an individual walking around a construction site.
According to witnesses quoted by the News Journal, when the suspect got onto a bicycle and fled the construction site, Officer Ard pursued in his squad car, flashing his lights and even attempting to Tase the suspect from the moving vehicle.
Originally posted by RuneSpider
A friend of mine went hunting with a bunch of guys one time. He was accidentally shot by one of the guys, it happens sometimes.
Decent fellow, stupid decision.
Regardless of what was the end result, it was not the intent to kill the fellow with the car.
He was attempting to bring him down with the taser, and was traveling to close.
Reeks of idiocy, but not purposeful murder.
The Pensacola New Journal reported on a story yesterday that, based on what was reported, concerns me as a criminal defense attorney who practices criminal law primarily in Pensacola. My comment here has nothing to do with the sinister nature of taking wedding gifts from a wedding; I think someone stealing something from anyone else should suffer consequences for their criminal acts taking into consideration the motivation for their behavior. Furthermore, I don't have knowledge of all of the evidence that may exist in the case; however, from reading the arrest report and from what I read in the newspaper I see a dearth of evidence that resulted in another young couple being treated very callously not only by the Pensacola News Journal but also by the Pensacola Police.
...
Pensacola police used the fact that the employee had used the gift card as probable cause to obtain a search warrant from a judge and then proceeded to break down the front door of her home at around 6:30 a.m. the day after they received the warrant. The police had no other evidence before they took the barbarian measure of busting down this families front door other than she had been at the Yacht Club on her day off and had used a department store card which had apparently been intended to be given to the new couple.
...
First, what evidence was cited in the article other than the police had that this girl had possibly used a gift card that was given as a gift to the wedding couple? Could she have found it in the parking lot? Could it have been accidentally dropped by the real wedding “bandits.” But to add insult to the injury, the New Journal felt the article worthy to publish this article on the front page using the title of a recent popular movie to gain attention and sell papers. Did they even consider that this employee is considered innocent until proven guilty?
...
And does the seriousness of this offense really warrant the Pensacola Police Department using a battering ram to break down a door of a couple’s home, a couple with small children, involving a case where the estimated value the gifts taken to be approximately $1000? Was there no more gentile way to conduct this investigation? But then again, at least from what little I currently know about the case, officers found no evidence that the employee had any other article that was stolen other than the department store card which she had used.
Originally posted by RuneSpider
reply to post by Lillydale
It is a stupid mistake. Stupid mistake can end with people being killed.
Originally posted by Chillidog1
...I'm also curious as to why they left the police car on the victim for 3 hours as opposed to maybe pulling the victim out and attempting live saving measures...
Originally posted by RoofMonkey
Originally posted by Chillidog1
That's easy. 3 hours gives them time to figure out their story and where to attach the handcuffs.... just in case he wants to flee.
Sounds very plausible
Disputing reports
Another witness, David Taylor, 25, said the bicyclist, who appeared to be a teenager, was dragged after being stuck beneath the police car. His account differed from the police news release, which stated that Ard fired the Taser but did not hit the man. He also said Ard had not activated his siren. Taylor also said he never heard Ard shouting at the man.
“The kid fell off the bike (after being shocked with a stun gun) and then was stumbling because of the momentum,” Taylor said. “It was probably about 10 to 15 feet that the man was drug.”
In 2007, the Pensacola City Council paid a $25,000 settlement to a man who was shot with a stun gun by Pensacola police officers during a traffic stop. The man was pulled over because an officer couldn't see the decal on his license plate. After arguing with police, the man was pulled from his car, shocked with the stun gun and arrested on charges of resisting arrest.
The man later was found not guilty of resisting officers, and the traffic charges were dropped.
Originally posted by RuneSpider
Regardless of what was the end result, it was not the intent to kill the fellow with the car.
He was attempting to bring him down with the taser, and was traveling to close.
Reeks of idiocy, but not purposeful murder.
Originally posted by ItsallCrazy
In the UK you can get done for eating whilst driving but this prat think's he's Beverley Hill Cop hanging out of car windows firing a taser.
And the poor lad who got run down.. for no reason, what's betting the police 'find' a gun or drugs on the guy now that they're cast in an extremely ill light.
What an absolute lemon, he doesn't deserve a driver's licence let alone a cop badge
[edit on 5-10-2009 by ItsallCrazy]