It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The arguments against a World Government could be applied to the United States. Before the states got united, there were at least three languages - English, French, and Spanish. Probably others I don't know about, plus ones spoken by First Nations people. Whatever. Now we speak English mostly. It's not the end of the world.
Originally posted by TheWalkingFox
Arguing against a one-world government is kind of like arguing against allowing the Kzinti to win. I mean sure, it would really suck if tiger-like warrior aliens managed to conquer earth, no doubt! ...But they don't really exist.
Originally posted by Miraj
reply to post by Donnie Darko
On the topic of a unified world.. I will say that..
It must be avoided until everyone wants to unite.
We are not yet mature enough to reach this goal.
A one world govt. at this point would be best described as
"Chaos out of order"
If the change is not wanted then endless chaos will follow.
Originally posted by Donnie Darko
I'm hardly a nationalist, but what is wrong with having different cultures? I actually think government should become more localized but based on some kind of global human rights, common-sense protocol.
Originally posted by blackpheonix
I am for it. People putting their "cultural Heritage" before advancement it ignorant. Atrocities will always be committed there wasn't a time in history that they where not a OWG has more pros then cons.
Originally posted by The_Seeker
A One World Gov, doesnt mean anyone would have to give up thier culture, or their way of life.
It would be supportive of all cultures.