|
|
Topic started on 3-10-2009 @ 07:52 PM by AboveTopSecretX
|
NEW Dr. Jonathan Reed. LINK: Documentary -
True Story of Alien Contact. May 9th, 2009.
Without any doubt the most fascinating tale of extra-terrestrial contact encounter in human history and abovetopsecret has been gracious enough to
allow this thread to stand on its own because they are about truth and facts and hard evidence in which the Jonathan Reed Case has monumental
portions, to be examined and investigated by all. The debunkers dont know what to do except paste disinformation links from a disinformation website
that has basically sealed its own fate to their credibility and are not to be taken seriously. 
[edit on 3-10-2009 by AboveTopSecretX]
|
copyright & usage
|
Click here for more [HOAX!] topics
Hot Topics
|
Top Topics
|
This Week
|
Subscribe
|
Home
|
reply posted on 3-10-2009 @ 09:24 PM by Skeptical Ed
|
Originally posted by AboveTopSecretX
NEW Dr. Jonathan Reed. LINK: Documentary -
True Story of Alien Contact. May 9th, 2009.
Without any doubt the most fascinating tale of extra-terrestrial contact encounter in human history and abovetopsecret has been gracious enough to
allow this thread to stand on its own because they are about truth and facts and hard evidence in which the Jonathan Reed Case has monumental
portions, to be examined and investigated by all. The debunkers dont know what to do except paste disinformation links from a disinformation website
that has basically sealed its own fate to their credibility and are not to be taken seriously.
[edit on 3-10-2009 by AboveTopSecretX]
Oh, come on! Isn't there something of real interest instead of reviving cases that have been proven hoaxes? This video sucks and you expect anyone
to watch 14?
www.ufowatchdog.com...
[edit on 3-10-2009 by Skeptical Ed]
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 3-10-2009 @ 09:52 PM by InfaRedMan
|
Originally posted by Skeptical Ed
Oh, come on! Isn't there something of real interest instead of reviving cases that have been proven hoaxes? This video sucks and you expect anyone
to watch 14?
www.ufowatchdog.com...
Exactly Skep!
Any thread concerning Dr ( I'm not really a doctor) Jonathan ( My names not really Reed) Rutter should be sent straight to the HOAX
forum. I have two words for people who sadly believe this crap.
Cognitive Dissonance!
IRM 
|
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 3-10-2009 @ 11:26 PM by Skeptical Ed
|
Originally posted by InfaRedMan
Originally posted by Skeptical Ed
Oh, come on! Isn't there something of real interest instead of reviving cases that have been proven hoaxes? This video sucks and you expect anyone
to watch 14?
www.ufowatchdog.com...
Exactly Skep!
Any thread concerning Dr ( I'm not really a doctor) Jonathan ( My names not really Reed) Rutter should be sent straight to the HOAX
forum. I have two words for people who sadly believe this crap.
Cognitive Dissonance!
IRM
One thread is bad enough but the Mods have allowed 3 threads with 2 being by this guy! Talk about a waste of bandwidth!
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 4-10-2009 @ 12:56 AM by nightmare_david
|
Originally posted by Skeptical EdOne thread is bad enough but the Mods have allowed 3 threads with 2 being by this guy! Talk about a
waste of bandwidth!
And you're one-liner posts where all you say is stuff like:
"Yeah, right" or "blah, blah, blah"
Isn't a waste of bandwidth? Because I see nothing useful in those posts of yours. There's a reason why ATS doesn't like one-liner posts 
[edit on 4-10-2009 by nightmare_david]
|
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 4-10-2009 @ 01:23 AM by AboveTopSecretX
|
skeptic one-liners come with the territory especially when they, debunkers, can offer nothing to refute the case, other than reed changing his name to
protect family and friends. makes me laugh they think reed protecting his family and friends is going to somehow make others totally avoid hard
physical evidence because they, debunkers, know how to type the word hoax over and over again.
[edit on 4-10-2009 by AboveTopSecretX]
|
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 4-10-2009 @ 01:41 AM by AboveTopSecretX
|
thetruthproject: Classic Debunking Debunker websites Dis-Info ufowatchdog
|
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 4-10-2009 @ 02:18 AM by InfaRedMan
|
reply to post by AboveTopSecretX
You will find that many here are not debunkers... more so believers with the intelligence to question and investigate all claims. Not cling tightly to
unsubstantiated or downright fraudulent claims that hurt the field of UFOlogy... which is exactly what supporting this type of crackpot material
achieves. It also provides fertile ground in which charlatans thrive and prosper.
Well Done!
IRM 
|
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 4-10-2009 @ 02:39 AM by AboveTopSecretX
|
|
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 4-10-2009 @ 08:32 PM by nightmare_david
|
You really need to research this guy a little more. Reed isn't even his name and he's not a doctor. Anything coming out of this guys mouth is a
flat-out lie. He's a very well known hoaxer.
Seriously, do some research on the guy and look at how many different names he's used. He doesn't get different names to protect family. He's a
con-man, plain and simple.
[edit on 4-10-2009 by nightmare_david]
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 4-10-2009 @ 09:50 PM by spartan1337
|
This was proven fake years ago
|
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 5-10-2009 @ 10:00 AM by GezinhoKiko
|
For all those saying fake and hoaxer, how about we see some solid evidence to these claims? and not no BS from ufowatchdog, all the people saying fake
and hoax can only say he changed his name and wasnt a DR, and thats because you were told this? did you go to his old work and dig threw files? no,
did you work where he worked and knew him? no, so just because your told he wasnt a DR dosent meen he wasnt, sheeeeeeeples, bah bah bah bah! flock off
and let the people who truly want to investigate this case do so in peace.
|
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 5-10-2009 @ 10:09 AM by kshaund
|
I totally agree - from what I've seen of his story, it has NOT been debunked in any way except "say so's". The UFOWatchdog website is a total
scam, it has denied things I've experienced (like being in Village Labs with Jim Delitosso) and has provided nothing in way of anything concrete.
With all due respect IRF, you have declared his story a hoax (and if I recall) it was based on the anatomy not moving correctly in the filming
(and/or) because the 'dummy' used looks like a halloween brand from K-Mart. I don't recall which one you were using, apologies, but I honestly
haven't been satisfied this is in any way a hoax.
I've also not seen any discussion about his photos of the floating aircraft - I am totally open-minded, but I cannot just go along with people
declaring "hoax" based on opinion or even worse someone else's opinion....
So yes, it would be very good to go over the 'evidence' this is a hoax... for anyone with the time and patience, something I know we're all short
of!
Did he change his name? So what if he did? Doesn't mean he didn't have that experience. I've changed my name too, does that mean everything before
was a lie? No, it means I changed my name....
quote]Originally posted by GezinhoKiko
For all those saying fake and hoaxer, how about we see some solid evidence to these claims? and not no BS from ufowatchdog, all the people saying fake
and hoax can only say he changed his name and wasnt a DR, and thats because you were told this? did you go to his old work and dig threw files? no,
did you work where he worked and knew him? no, so just because your told he wasnt a DR dosent meen he wasnt, sheeeeeeeples, bah bah bah bah! flock off
and let the people who truly want to investigate this case do so in peace.
|
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 13-10-2009 @ 02:50 PM by ChipDouglasManOfAction
|
Originally posted by AboveTopSecretX
NEW Dr. Jonathan Reed. LINK: Documentary -
True Story of Alien Contact. May 9th, 2009.
Without any doubt the most fascinating tale of extra-terrestrial contact encounter in human history and abovetopsecret has been gracious enough to
allow this thread to stand on its own because they are about truth and facts and hard evidence in which the Jonathan Reed Case has monumental
portions, to be examined and investigated by all. The debunkers dont know what to do except paste disinformation links from a disinformation website
that has basically sealed its own fate to their credibility and are not to be taken seriously.
[edit on 3-10-2009 by AboveTopSecretX]
I was actually able to watch some of this documentary. Very good. Real up close and personal. Hope there will be more information in the future on
this case because its just incredible.
|
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 13-10-2009 @ 03:01 PM by ChipDouglasManOfAction
|
Originally posted by GezinhoKiko
For all those saying fake and hoaxer, how about we see some solid evidence to these claims? and not no BS from ufowatchdog, all the people saying fake
and hoax can only say he changed his name and wasnt a DR, and thats because you were told this? did you go to his old work and dig threw files? no,
did you work where he worked and knew him? no, so just because your told he wasnt a DR dosent meen he wasnt, sheeeeeeeples, bah bah bah bah! flock off
and let the people who truly want to investigate this case do so in peace.
Gezinhokiko you are absolutely correct in your assessment made. alot of those people claiming hoax are just doing it from hearsay and disinformation
from a website that only promotes disinformation. theyve done nothing themselves. from what ive been hearing about people whove been around reed, is
that theyve seen firsthand this being appearing. i know someone personally who has seen the being and knowing this person as long as i have they would
not make up anything just to appease someone. there are many people coming forward speaking out about seeing the being and that puts to rest the hoax
argument that the alien is not real. people have seen it. large groups of people. audiences. cant be fake if people are seeing it. thats when you know
the disinformation is exactly that - lies! reeds case has been proven time and time again. im glad people are now realizing it, regardless of the hoax
reflex used by skeptics and debunkers.
|
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 20-10-2009 @ 12:29 PM by ChipDouglasManOfAction
|
Originally posted by kshaund
I totally agree - from what I've seen of his story, it has NOT been debunked in any way except "say so's". The UFOWatchdog website is a total
scam, it has denied things I've experienced (like being in Village Labs with Jim Delitosso) and has provided nothing in way of anything concrete.
With all due respect IRF, you have declared his story a hoax (and if I recall) it was based on the anatomy not moving correctly in the filming
(and/or) because the 'dummy' used looks like a halloween brand from K-Mart. I don't recall which one you were using, apologies, but I honestly
haven't been satisfied this is in any way a hoax.
I've also not seen any discussion about his photos of the floating aircraft - I am totally open-minded, but I cannot just go along with people
declaring "hoax" based on opinion or even worse someone else's opinion....
So yes, it would be very good to go over the 'evidence' this is a hoax... for anyone with the time and patience, something I know we're all short
of!
Did he change his name? So what if he did? Doesn't mean he didn't have that experience. I've changed my name too, does that mean everything before
was a lie? No, it means I changed my name....
quote]Originally posted by GezinhoKiko
For all those saying fake and hoaxer, how about we see some solid evidence to these claims? and not no BS from ufowatchdog, all the people saying fake
and hoax can only say he changed his name and wasnt a DR, and thats because you were told this? did you go to his old work and dig threw files? no,
did you work where he worked and knew him? no, so just because your told he wasnt a DR dosent meen he wasnt, sheeeeeeeples, bah bah bah bah! flock off
and let the people who truly want to investigate this case do so in peace.
Congradulations to those who can see through the lies from the purporters of disinformation. - Chip Douglas, Man of Action.
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 25-10-2009 @ 12:36 AM by Aspie
|
You mean Chip Douglas aka Rutter
|
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 27-10-2009 @ 04:10 PM by ChipDouglasManOfAction
|
No actually I mean Chip Douglas, Man of Action.
Chip Douglas - Man of Action.
|
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 28-10-2009 @ 04:12 PM by Aspie
|
Rutter, Man of no Substance
|
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 30-10-2009 @ 03:20 PM by ChipDouglasManOfAction
|
Originally posted by Aspie
Rutter, Man of no Substance
Aspie prove Im Rutter.
- Chip Douglas, Man of Action.
|
copyright & usage
|
|
