It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Ghost Pics please analyze and comment

page: 1
1

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 3 2009 @ 03:11 PM
link   
ley lines in Burlington,Ontario into the center of the so-called vortex.

I took these pics right after one another and could not get the same result.
these were taken on 10/31/2008
Taken with Canon Powershot A710iS 7.1mp




Also these other pics show what I think is a ghost woman in a blue victorian style attire.
Remember these were taken in 2005 with a 2.0mp camera (#ty one) so.
The first image is raw. The second I have made an attempt to brighten it up and highlight the area of interest.
These were take in Burlington,On,Canada also. At Emma's Back porch bar and grill. You can even look up the bar as it is on the web, search it. It was one of the first restaurants in Ontario. The building is very old.

I know I had the real raw image on a thumbdrive but it was lost so the image is kind of grainy from getting it from my other source.
All of these pics are mine. I took them and at the time I did not see the woman when I shot the camera at the mirror.
That mirror is original 1800's so it has seen a lot of history.

Anyway. I can talk more or you can just take a look at these pics and give me your .02cents.






posted on Oct, 3 2009 @ 03:19 PM
link   
Your first three pictures are taken with a dirty lens. you have dust particles on it. in your last two doesnt look like a goast to me.. just a blue object in your picture.



posted on Oct, 3 2009 @ 03:21 PM
link   
reply to post by ontariocanada
 


The first 3 Just looks like dust particles, dirty lens, pollen particles and flash capture. The last two are obvious glares, you can see the lights reflection bouncing off of the glass. But I see what you circled and it could just be a person in a dress. Could be the light and the the angle at which you and that person in the dress was standing making the person blurry and giving you the impression of a ghost. It is honestly too blurry to say that person is even a man or woman, let alone a ghost. The lights just made everything blend together and everyone in that photo is blurry..

Nothing ghostly... But that last picture is still pretty cool with the light. Sorry mate, but in my opinion this is nothing near paranormal.

[edit on Oct 3rd 2009 by TheMythLives]



posted on Oct, 3 2009 @ 03:22 PM
link   
I like orb pics and think that there is something paranormal to them. I don't think that all orb pics should be dismissed as pollen or water droplets, but not everyone agrees with me.

as for the woman, she looks to be wearing modern winter clothes, hat, scarf.. could be a restuarant patron that was walking by as you snapped the pic.



posted on Oct, 3 2009 @ 03:26 PM
link   
i honestly didn't touch the lens. the pics were taken 30 seconds apart so i dont know how i can get that brown-red mist look thing going on.
it's just a small camera with factory flash on it so the night quality is low.

But see how in the 3rd pic the dust and orbs are gone.
It was damn cold that night too.



posted on Oct, 3 2009 @ 03:28 PM
link   
reply to post by Smokinbbl
 


The last two pics are real old and kinda #ty. I don't know if you can see but it looks to me like a blue dress and a white bonnet hat.

But that could also be imagination too.



posted on Oct, 3 2009 @ 03:30 PM
link   
reply to post by Smokinbbl
 


That night I also took 100 pics that night and didn't get the so-called "dirty lens" effect on any else.



posted on Oct, 3 2009 @ 03:35 PM
link   
reply to post by worldwatcher
 


The object in question is circled in red and that night I didn't see anyone at the restaurant in blue or wearing some type of hat or scarf. They had the upstairs dining where we were kinda closed off but there were people eating. they had on dress clothes because its a fine dining establishment.


I got so excited when I originally found these pics on my HD but as more eyes view I can see that most of it gets easily dismissed.

Have yet to see an exceptional ghost pic myself.



posted on Oct, 3 2009 @ 03:38 PM
link   
I don't see anything but orb's or dust no ghost's. The second pic's can't tell anything.



posted on Oct, 3 2009 @ 03:52 PM
link   



So, tell me what you see here?


I will say this, I don't think your original photo has to do with dust on the lens.



posted on Oct, 3 2009 @ 04:04 PM
link   
reply to post by RuneSpider
 


I see hundreds of orbs.
The skeptic would call those water droplets but I see orbs.

Did I miss something?



posted on Oct, 3 2009 @ 04:09 PM
link   
reply to post by ontariocanada
 


Here's the same place, same time (roughly) without the flash on.
Now what do you see?


[edit on 3-10-2009 by RuneSpider]



posted on Oct, 3 2009 @ 04:43 PM
link   
reply to post by RuneSpider
 


i see looks like windows to a house, car lights,
and a giant glowing orb.
or could it be a street light. it's kind of too low for a street light.

i can't really explain. it's unusual.
i'm going with single orb of unknown origin.

tell me if i'm wrong and its a street lamp.



posted on Oct, 3 2009 @ 05:00 PM
link   
reply to post by ontariocanada
 


It actually is a street light.

I'm drawing the comparison here between taking a photo with a flash, and without a flash, on a foggy night.

I took these photos a few years ago, at the time planing to hoax a forum i was a member of. Never used them for that, but they are useful to prove my point.

Very rarely do you have pictures of orbs without using the flash.
Orbs come about from the flash on the camera, with the flash reflecting off of drops of moisture, dust, or even small insects near the camera.

You also can get similar affects from pointing the camera at a bright light source, or just a brightly colored object in view. That's how you get glare.



posted on Oct, 3 2009 @ 08:08 PM
link   
great!

that debunks a lot of people showing orbs in hundreds of photos when a flash is used.

excellent comparison!!




posted on Oct, 3 2009 @ 10:35 PM
link   
reply to post by ontariocanada
 


Well, it at least should cause people to be more skeptical. I remember being disapointed when I'd watch a ghost hunting doc, and their sole piece of evidence for the place being haunted was a singular orb.



posted on Oct, 14 2009 @ 02:01 PM
link   

Originally posted by RuneSpider
reply to post by ontariocanada
 


It actually is a street light.

I'm drawing the comparison here between taking a photo with a flash, and without a flash, on a foggy night.

I took these photos a few years ago, at the time planing to hoax a forum i was a member of. Never used them for that, but they are useful to prove my point.

Very rarely do you have pictures of orbs without using the flash.
Orbs come about from the flash on the camera, with the flash reflecting off of drops of moisture, dust, or even small insects near the camera.

You also can get similar affects from pointing the camera at a bright light source, or just a brightly colored object in view. That's how you get glare.




Dude, seriously, why are you PLANNING on doing a hoax to anyone in the first place? Get over it and start capturing real images for the world, brotha.



new topics

top topics



 
1

log in

join