Ghost Pics please analyze and comment, page 1
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 1 times


reply posted on 3-10-2009 @ 03:21 PM by TheMythLives
reply to post by ontariocanada



The first 3 Just looks like dust particles, dirty lens, pollen particles and flash capture. The last two are obvious glares, you can see the lights reflection bouncing off of the glass. But I see what you circled and it could just be a person in a dress. Could be the light and the the angle at which you and that person in the dress was standing making the person blurry and giving you the impression of a ghost. It is honestly too blurry to say that person is even a man or woman, let alone a ghost. The lights just made everything blend together and everyone in that photo is blurry..

Nothing ghostly... But that last picture is still pretty cool with the light. Sorry mate, but in my opinion this is nothing near paranormal.

[edit on Oct 3rd 2009 by TheMythLives]



reply posted on 3-10-2009 @ 03:28 PM by ontariocanada
reply to post by Smokinbbl



The last two pics are real old and kinda #ty. I don't know if you can see but it looks to me like a blue dress and a white bonnet hat.

But that could also be imagination too.


reply posted on 3-10-2009 @ 03:30 PM by ontariocanada
reply to post by Smokinbbl



That night I also took 100 pics that night and didn't get the so-called "dirty lens" effect on any else.


reply posted on 3-10-2009 @ 03:35 PM by ontariocanada
reply to post by worldwatcher



The object in question is circled in red and that night I didn't see anyone at the restaurant in blue or wearing some type of hat or scarf. They had the upstairs dining where we were kinda closed off but there were people eating. they had on dress clothes because its a fine dining establishment.


I got so excited when I originally found these pics on my HD but as more eyes view I can see that most of it gets easily dismissed.

Have yet to see an exceptional ghost pic myself.



reply posted on 3-10-2009 @ 04:04 PM by ontariocanada
reply to post by RuneSpider



I see hundreds of orbs.
The skeptic would call those water droplets but I see orbs.

Did I miss something?


reply posted on 3-10-2009 @ 04:09 PM by RuneSpider
reply to post by ontariocanada



Here's the same place, same time (roughly) without the flash on.
Now what do you see?


[edit on 3-10-2009 by RuneSpider]


reply posted on 3-10-2009 @ 04:43 PM by ontariocanada
reply to post by RuneSpider



i see looks like windows to a house, car lights,
and a giant glowing orb.
or could it be a street light. it's kind of too low for a street light.

i can't really explain. it's unusual.
i'm going with single orb of unknown origin.

tell me if i'm wrong and its a street lamp.


reply posted on 3-10-2009 @ 05:00 PM by RuneSpider
reply to post by ontariocanada



It actually is a street light.

I'm drawing the comparison here between taking a photo with a flash, and without a flash, on a foggy night.

I took these photos a few years ago, at the time planing to hoax a forum i was a member of. Never used them for that, but they are useful to prove my point.

Very rarely do you have pictures of orbs without using the flash.
Orbs come about from the flash on the camera, with the flash reflecting off of drops of moisture, dust, or even small insects near the camera.

You also can get similar affects from pointing the camera at a bright light source, or just a brightly colored object in view. That's how you get glare.


reply posted on 3-10-2009 @ 10:35 PM by RuneSpider
reply to post by ontariocanada



Well, it at least should cause people to be more skeptical. I remember being disapointed when I'd watch a ghost hunting doc, and their sole piece of evidence for the place being haunted was a singular orb.


reply posted on 14-10-2009 @ 02:01 PM by Zeta Reticuli
Originally posted by RuneSpider
reply to
post by ontariocanada



It actually is a street light.

I'm drawing the comparison here between taking a photo with a flash, and without a flash, on a foggy night.

I took these photos a few years ago, at the time planing to hoax a forum i was a member of. Never used them for that, but they are useful to prove my point.

Very rarely do you have pictures of orbs without using the flash.
Orbs come about from the flash on the camera, with the flash reflecting off of drops of moisture, dust, or even small insects near the camera.

You also can get similar affects from pointing the camera at a bright light source, or just a brightly colored object in view. That's how you get glare.




Dude, seriously, why are you PLANNING on doing a hoax to anyone in the first place? Get over it and start capturing real images for the world, brotha.
Pages:     ^^TOP^^



Big Name Neuroscientist Announces Telepathy as Proven Fact!
  Posted 3 days ago with 138 member flags
For the Skeptics that believe Healing is fake, heres PROOF
  Posted 18 days ago with 15 member flags
I NEED YOUR EARS for my ghost box session
  Posted 10 days ago with 14 member flags
Clown sightings/attempted abductions in the midwest
  Posted 8 days ago with 14 member flags
*Experiment* Reading Your Emotions & Body Language
  Posted 17 days ago with 10 member flags
Strange (Scary) Experience I had.
  Posted 5 days ago with 10 member flags
Pareidolia.... Funny :)
  Posted 4 days ago with 8 member flags
Distance Healers unite to save the Planet
  Posted 18 days ago with 7 member flags

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Free Psychic Readings
  General Chit Chat, Posted 15 hours ago, 112 replies
Hollow Earth Theory New Evidence.
  General Conspiracies, Posted 13 hours ago, 88 replies
Anonymous show your face!
  Rant, Posted 9 hours ago, 62 replies
Free will
  Philosophy and Metaphysics, Posted 17 hours ago, 54 replies