Planes can be Electronically Hijacked, This is fact., page 9

reply to post by Lillydale

---

I guess it is lucky for a lot of previous 757 airline passengers
-- that those aircraft don't have a reverse gear LOL

reply to post by Lillydale

---

Last time I looked this is NOT a 'court of law' and NOT a 'classroom'....

...but, if some get kicks out of impugning others, then so be it....

Originally posted by weedwhacker
reply to post by Lillydale

---

Last time I looked this is NOT a 'court of law' and NOT a 'classroom'....

...but, if some get kicks out of impugning others, then so be it....

Just a place where I thought people were discussing something in English. If you want to speak another language, please do so. If you are going to lie and contradict yourself, do not blame it on the fact that I understand the language and you do not.

reply to post by PHIXER2

---

The British have a Tornado fighter equiped with a system that can take over control of a hijacked airliner.

That is quite a statement.

AND it is unfounded and unsupported UNTIL you cite a source for it.

We are waiting.....
__________________________________________________________

here, I'll blow you out of the water all by myself...

Tornado jet fighters are being scrambled on intercept counter-hijacking operations every month to check on commercial airliners flying into British airspace, the head of the RAF has disclosed to The Times.
It is the first time since the end of the Cold War that fighters are being regularly scrambled from UK air bases to monitor aircraft in national airspace.

Please explain HOW they can "take over control" again???

The operation to check up on planes is producing a bill running into tens of thousands of pounds as it costs between £7,000 and £9,000 for a Tornado to be in the air for an hour.

Air Chief Marshal Sir Glenn Torpey, the Chief of the Air Staff, said that since the 9/11 terrorist attacks in New York and Washington there had been at least one incident a month requiring an RAF fighter from a quick-reaction alert unit to intervene.

He told The Times: “The Tornados have been launching pretty regularly for any aircraft that appear to be behaving oddly: for instance, where airline pilots fail to communicate with flight control or take an unexpected route.”

Now, this is a common occurence...losing touch, missing a frequency change....too bad it doesn't happen more often in the USA...oh, wait, it DOES!

He added: “We’re pretty acutely aware of the short time that we have to respond to these incidents. If there is any doubt at all about an aircraft, we launch the Tornados.”

NOW, remember something about the size of the ENTIRE UK, compared to the USA...OK?

But, this gets interesting...and tears up so MANY 9/11 "conspiracy theorists"....

Before the 9/11 attacks there were no interceptions of commercial airliners but the heightened terrorist threat now means that any deviation from a strict flight plan tends to trigger an interception by a Tornado. Four quick-reaction alert Tornado F3 planes are on permanent standby to investigate any plane that has not conformed precisely to accepted flight control procedures. Two are at RAF Marham in Norfolk and a further two at RAF Leuchars, the most northerly air defence station, in Fife, eastern Scotland. In addition, RAF fighter crews are kept in close proximity to royal flights in case of terror emergencies.

Need I mention the relative SIZE if the landmass that is the UK???

*skipping*

The RAF chief told The Times of an incident last month when the captain of a North West Airlines plane flying from Charles de Gaulle airport in Paris to Detroit in the United States asked to divert to Prestwick after a passenger became disruptive. The RAF was alerted and a decision taken to shadow the flight with a Tornado F3 that was already airborne. When the passenger became increasingly agitated the airline pilot was put on route to Prestwick, near Glasgow, and landed safely.

AGAIN,,,, just WHERE did the Tornado fighter "take over" the suspected hijacked airplane?????

The very nature of this baloney comes from UNSUPPORTED and IMAGINATIVE ideas, based solely, it seems, on what some Hollywood scriptwriter was conjured up (and after some idiot Hollywood "producers" have meddled with it, against the writer's wishes...and the 'Director" shoots it, without stopping to question its veracity or logic...)

SO, people (layman) buy into it, because it SELLS POPCORN and brings them to the theater....




[edit on 16 October 2009 by weedwhacker]

Originally posted by weedwhacker
reply to post by PHIXER2

---

The British have a Tornado fighter equiped with a system that can take over control of a hijacked airliner.

That is quite a statement.

AND it is unfounded and unsupported UNTIL you cite a source for it.

We are waiting.....

You're wasting your time.

That's Ultima you're responding to.

Originally posted by Joey Canoli
You're wasting your time.

That's Ultima you're responding to.

You are correct, Joey

I can link posts where he has made those exact statements...

www.abovetopsecret.com...

...plus his photobucket account is phixer6.

coincidence?

[edit on 16-10-2009 by gavron]

reply to post by gavron

---

How about that. Here I thought that you had claimed I was this Ultima person. What is my photobucket account name? Where are there any similarities in my writing and his/hers??? I know an adult would apologize for accusing someone of something and getting it wrong. I will just have to wait and see what you are.

Originally posted by gavron


You are correct, Joey

I can link posts where he has made those exact statements...

www.abovetopsecret.com...

...plus his photobucket account is phixer6.

coincidence?

[edit on 16-10-2009 by gavron]

No.

I already called him out.

And he admitted to it in the OT posts he and I had.

Originally posted by weedwhacker
That is quite a statement.

AND it is unfounded and unsupported UNTIL you cite a source for it.

We are waiting.....

Gee you really should learn how to do research.

Its so fun and easy to prove you wrong with facts and evidence.

www.newscientist.com...
UK defence firm Qinetiq demonstrated the system on 30 March. The pilot of a modified Tornado fighter plane assumed remote control of a BAC 1-11 airliner carrying members of the press, including New Scientist, and flying at an altitude of 4500 metres (15000 feet).




[edit on 16-10-2009 by PHIXER2]

Originally posted by PHIXER2

www.newscientist.com...
UK defence firm Qinetiq demonstrated the system on 30 March. The pilot of a modified Tornado fighter plane assumed remote control of a BAC 1-11 airliner carrying members of the press, including New Scientist, and flying at an altitude of 4500 metres (15000 feet).

March 30, 2007....

not exactly before the 911 attacks....

9-11 lecture at Basel University, Switzerland.
  Posted 16 days ago with 14 member flags

Newest 9/11 Documentary - Proof 9/11 was an inside Job
  Posted 0 days ago with 14 member flags

9/11 Actors re-visited
  Posted 9 days ago with 13 member flags

An Overview and Debunking of the AE9/11T\'s List of Demolition Signs
  Posted 18 days ago with 12 member flags

Building Collapses in Rio
  Posted 16 days ago with 6 member flags

new film "Human the film (2012)" covers all the bases and more!
  Posted 10 days ago with 6 member flags

Final Decision: Court sanctions lawyers behind September 11 conspiracy case
  Posted 11 days ago with 6 member flags

Remains of 9/11 victim identified
  Posted 2 days ago with 5 member flags

Newest topics, updated in real-time:

Newest topics getting flags, in real-time:

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time: