It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
www.geocities.com...
In the mid-seventies America faced a new and escalating crisis, with US commercial jets being hijacked for geopolitical purposes. Determined to gain the upper hand in this new form of aerial warfare, two American multinationals collaborated with the Defense Advanced Projects Agency (DARPA) on a project designed to facilitate the remote recovery of hijacked American aircraft. Brilliant both in concept and operation, “Home Run” [not its real code name] allowed specialist ground controllers to listen in to cockpit conversations on the target aircraft, then take absolute control of its computerized flight control system by remote means.
forum.prisonplanet.com...
Ptech is of course the high level technology firm by top bin Laden financier Yassin al Qahdi(who works with Khalid Bin Mahfouz, named in the 'Golden Chain') that by 1996 was deeply immersed in top US government network computer systems like a neo PROMIS INSLAW.
Ptech had networks in the basement of the FAA as of 9/11, along with Mitre.
Originally posted by Doc Tesla
Occam's razor-The simplest answer is usually the correct answer.
The simplest answer is that there were real people on the planes flying them. Who controlled and funded those people is the real question.
Activating the primary Home Run channel proved to be easy. Most readers will have heard of a “transponder”, prominent in most news reports immediately following the attacks on New York and Washington. Technically a transponder is a combined radio transmitter and receiver which operates automatically....
The signals sent provide a unique “identity” for each aircraft...
...essential in crowded airspace to avoid mid-air collisions...
...and equally essential for Home Run controllers trying to lock onto the correct aircraft.
Once it has located the correct aircraft, Home Run “piggy backs” a data transmission onto the transponder channel and takes direct control from the ground.
This explains why none of the aircraft sent a special “I have been hijacked” transponder code, despite multiple activation points on all four aircraft.
Because the transponder frequency had already been piggy backed by Home Run, transmission of the special hijack code was rendered impossible.
Of course should anyone wish to listen to weedwhacker, then also please allow him to reprogram You that the govt. is good, and they're here to help What a load of horse poo...
Originally posted by sanchoearlyjones
Of course should anyone wish to listen to weedwhacker, then also please allow him to reprogram You that the govt. is good, and they're here to help What a load of horse poo...
But you're not denying they can be remotely flown are you?
The aircraft was remotely flown by NASA research pilot Fitzhugh (Fitz) Fulton from the NASA Dryden Remotely Controlled
Vehicle Facility.
Previously, the Boeing 720 had been flown on 14 practice flights with safety pilots onboard. During the 14 flights, there were 16 hours and 22 minutes of remotely piloted vehicle control, including 10 remotely piloted takeoffs, 69 remotely piloted vehicle controlled approaches, and 13 remotely piloted vehicle landings on abort runway.
It was planned that the aircraft would land wings-level and exactly on the centerline during the CID, thus allowing the fuselage
to remain intact as the wings were sliced open by eight posts cemented into the runway. The Boeing 720 landed askew and
caused a cabin fire when burning fuel was able to enter the fuselage.
It was not exactly the impact that was hoped for, but research from the CID program yielded new data on impact survivability which helped establish new FAA rules regarding fire prevention and retardant materials. Although proponents argued that AMK prevented a hotter, more catastrophic fire during the CID, FAA requirements for the additive were put on the back burner.
I've read a lot of articles, ones not on Geocities, and seen a lot of videos of the technology being demonstrated and used to fly and land planes.
Also, have you seen the clip for the Pilot Episode of the Lone Gunmen?
...then Occam's Razor slices in favour of the notion that there was no one on board the planes which impacted the twin towers on 9/11.
Originally posted by Swampfox46_1999
reply to post by OmegaPoint
And the body parts that ended up on the streets of Manhatten, that were collected prior to the buildings collapse then matched to people on the jets got there....how?
It is truly amazing how people create such complicated scenarios to explain their theories....and then proclaim that Occam's razor proves them right....