Are New Vaccines Laced With Birth-Control Drugs?

Interesting article from J.A. Miller - correspondent for Human Life International.

During the early 1990s, the World Health Organization (WHO) has been overseeing massive vaccination campaigns against tetanus in a number of countries, among them Nicaragua, Mexico, and the Philippines. In October 1994, HLI received a communication from its Mexican affiliate, the Comite' Pro Vida de Mexico, regarding that country's anti-tetanus campaign. Suspicious of the campaign protocols, the Comite' obtained several vials of the vaccine and had them analyzed by chemists. Some of the vials were found to contain human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG), a naturally occurring hormone essential for maintaining a pregnancy.

hCG and Anti-hCG Antibodies

In nature the hCG hormone alerts the woman's body that she is pregnant and causes the release of other hormones to prepare the uterine lining for the implantation of the fertilized egg. The rapid rise in hCG levels after conception makes it an excellent marker for confirmation of pregnancy: when a woman takes a pregnancy test she is not tested for the pregnancy itself, but for the elevated presence of hCG.

However, when introduced into the body coupled with a tetanus toxoid carrier, antibodies will be formed not only against tetanus but also against hCG. In this case the body fails to recognize hCG as a friend and will produce anti-hCG antibodies. The antibodies will attack subsequent pregnancies by killing the hCG which naturally sustains a pregnancy; when a woman has sufficient anti-hCG antibodies in her system, she is rendered incapable of maintaining a pregnancy.

educate-yourself.org...

I've mentioned this a couple of times, what if the swine flu vacine is designed to reduce the human population. But not through the way people think, what if instead it does it through causing sterillity.


You want to have children then you have to sign them and yourself as slaves to the PTB.

Surely if the vaccines contained any form of birth control at any effective level, `it wouldn't be a secret. No? There are enough informed people within the medical establishment with access to these vaccines, and who have access to the proper equipment needed to establish such a thing. Yet...

reply to post by quackers


If you are checking you may find these things but who is checking?

The people making the vacine work in a factory, how many know what every additive they make is supposed to do?

Also who is to say it isn't hidden in plain site?
Say like the OP article stated they have hCG in them to sterilize women. Or if people are looking in the nasal spray for a live (but weakened) virus, who is to say it's not a different virus. Say a mutant small pox virus that effects the testes of young boys rendering them sterile.

If you were Native American then you would be will aware of in our recent history (1970's) we already had a government sponsored eugenics program aimed at we native peoples...AKA: Forced Sterilization of Native American Women

No one even today knows exactly how many Native American women were sterilized during the 1970s. One base for calculation is provided by the General Accounting Office, whose study covered only four of twelve IHS regions over four years (1973 through 1976). Within those limits, 3,406 Indian women were sterilized, according to the GAO.

As for their so called pro-forma "consent" we know of At least two fifteen-year-old girls who were told they were having their tonsils out they had their ovaries removed instead.

So as to your question, Are New Vaccines Laced With Birth-Control Drugs? They have done worse in the past, much worse... but when they want to make sure a thing is done... they don't place their bets on a shot. they simply take the young ladies into a clinic and snip snip... as they say, history does repeat itself unless your vigilant

I am very interested to see some lab results on the swine flu vaccine.

Anyone that has access to this vaccine should send samples to a independent laboratory for analysis.

What we need are many samples of the vaccine from around the country analyzed.

I don't think this will be viable until there are millions of doses of the vaccine available.

Edit: Double Post



[edit on 3-10-2009 by lucentenigma]

reply to post by exile1981


Well the problem is that people make these claims with very little supporting evidence. If a vaccine is in the public domain then it is impossible to hide anything in it. Just because no one has looked does not mean it is hidden. Or could it be that people have looked, but found nothing to support the claims?

Not true in all cases mind you as it is common knowledge vaccines have been found to be tainted. Where the evidence falls short is in establishing a factual link between a "contamination" and a "hidden agenda".



[edit on 3-10-2009 by quackers]

reply to post by quackers



You are correct there is a lot of data on the web and other sources. What is true and what is not is a big question. Also how do you find a "independant lab"? Any lab that can do a full analysis is likely big and tied into the manufacturers, how would you know it was not tainted even if the report came back clean? Unless you can find a trully independant lab your out of luck.

We know they did it with the tetanus shots, why wouldn't thy do it now?

I have native friends who still talk about the infected blankets given to there tribe or the tainted meat.

Originally posted by exile1981
reply to post by quackers

 

You are correct there is a lot of data on the web and other sources. What is true and what is not is a big question. Also how do you find a "independant lab"? Any lab that can do a full analysis is likely big and tied into the manufacturers, how would you know it was not tainted even if the report came back clean? Unless you can find a trully independant lab your out of luck.

We know they did it with the tetanus shots, why wouldn't thy do it now?

I have native friends who still talk about the infected blankets given to there tribe or the tainted meat.

Take the label off the vial and send it to a lab and tell them you have no idea what it is, hence the analysis.

I could see sending it to a lab saying 'can you check this swine flu vaccine out?' with a baxter label on the vial.

They would just call the manufacturer and get their spec sheet on it and not even analyze it to save money or worse they're owned or in bed with the vaccine manufacturers.



[edit on 3-10-2009 by lucentenigma]

Here is another challenge on this, and a good reason for following lucentenigma's advice if undertaking this process. These swine flu vaccines are patented. Thus if the lab were to figure out the chemical formula for it and tell you, they could be in violation of trade secrets and get sued. Course, if they don't have any clue what they are testing other than possible biological contaminant, then they would possibly be immune from prosecution.

Interesting Thread! Can anyone get a sample that could be tested? Perhaps I could help.