Yet again the *Nothing to see here* evidence disinformation process rears it`s ugly head, nothing shows this aspect of protecting the OS better than September Clues, here we have a film with hundreds of theories regarding nigh on every aspect of 9/11, then it gets debunked for some obvious signs of editing and falsifying facts, and boom the whole video becomes nothing more than a blot on the landscape, and is avoided like the plague and a huge no-no for a researching source.

After a while it will have drifted into obscurity taking with it a lot of solid facts, that, if anyone ever picks up on, will be scorned upon for using similar explanations as those that were truly depicted in the film, as all have been tarred with the same brush.

There are those that hold their breath for proof of Thermite, or a flyover at the Pentagon or whatever, whereas my approach is aspects that can still be proved by pictures, videos, maths etc, it does not matter how big a point can be proved, any point that proves a different side than that of the OS - proves they have lied, prove this, over just one relevant aspect of 9/11, and ears will prick and heads will turn, the rest will follow suit.

Now when I see something like that bird scenario I question it, compare the two films - case closed, TLC tape shows so many signs of editing including out of sync audio/video for added frames, way to many captures of the object, different shape, different point of entry, a lot slower movement speed and over 3.1 seconds longer capturing time.

That my dear friends/enemies is exactly how I see it .

Another thread ends, with many unanswered questions......

1). The hole in WTC6 was present pre WTC1 collapse, a huge hole with just 2-3 storeys above it, and obviously the weakest part of the building, we are led to believe that 10 storeys were decimated by the collapse debris, yet this flimsy part of the building survived.

2). 10 storeys decimated, yet remarkably - The rest of WTC6 and it`s 8 above and 2 below storeys remained pretty much in tact (hugely buckled but standing), enough downward force to punch that crater but not enough to destroy a few storeys here and there or bring down the wall above the hole.

3). Such was the randomness of this downward force it made a huge hole in WTC6 left a small part near the exterior wall, jumped across the road and made a crater in WTC5.

4). The debris that caused this and the debris it caused managed to fill roughly one storey (12 feet in depth).

5). No one has explained how those steels where bent in that fashion.

6). Nor how that hole was caused.


The governments theory is based on debris from WTC1 being found in the crater, bearing in mind the kinetic energy on show when both towers collapsed, it is suffice to say that a building basically at it`s feet would be in a safe-ish zone, it would obviously get hit by some exterior steels and the dust flood, which imo is exactly what only 12 feet of debris in the crater depicts.

If the hole was not there before WTC1 collapse - How would the debris flood have enough force to travel horizontally and punch a hole through the steels, that it just failed to damage from a vertical and gravitational aspect?.

On a footnote I managed to point out that the TLC bird video has 100% been very poorly edited.

Originally posted by Cupcake

Before I start I feel I must confess that I am a neutral sort of guy regarding the whole aspects of 9/11, I was puzzled somewhat and intrigued at how a guy like you, that spends a lot of time doing research, and posts some very intricate and time consuming replies, threads, etcetera, could make these very simple mistakes, so I had a good trawl around some of your threads and noticed a similar pattern.

Sorry if I am about to spill the beans, but it seems fairly obvious to me that you lure in the opposition with some easy to prove otherwise bait, then bam!!, hit them with a haymaker, which in turn does wonders for some of your threads, as I have noticed that the $64,000 dollar question you keep in reserve, remains in most cases, unanswered, which of course reaps greater returns than constructing threads based purely on those questions, guys are not going to rush forward and reply to something they have no answers for.

I could have course got this horribly wrong, but it does not add up correctly that someone whom puts as much time into all this could make these very common simple mistakes.

Just my $2.

Mmmm, not sure where you are going with this, as to my MO, I keep my cards close to my chest, I do not approach this whole scenario as a game, I do not keep all my eggs in one basket.

As far as unanswered questions go, then yes, there are several aspects I have noticed that remain a mystery still....

1). The different explosions from the exit holes in WTC2.

2). The straight cuts in the exterior steel sections.

3). No signs of oxy-acetylene cutting on steels that have been cut.

4). Erratic and out of sequence lengths of the alloy Facade.

That is all I can think of atm, there are other aspects of course, but these are points that have had very little if any at all... attention. This thread is producing some points of interest also.

/cheers.