NASA don't bomb our Moon

NASA don't bomb our Moon
NASA don't bomb our Moon

what the hell are you thinking
our hearts are all sinking

you don't have our permission
on this thoughtless decision

we are the people of Earth
and had enough of your mirth

get back to the release
of disclosure and peace

not some primitive act
you will pay that's a fact

so all those that abide
by this terrible ride

you will feel the karma
due to your excessive drama

stand up and be heard
NASA this is absurd

should have written this sooner
to protect and save our lunar

NASA don't bomb our Moon

www.news.com.au...

[edit on 2-10-2009 by watchZEITGEISTnow]

lol@ news from australia

Yeah.NASA, don't bomb Moon. Join rest of us here and bomb the Earth. Good for karma.
Moon is a giant rock that had been constantly bombarded with meteorites. What is the big deal? There were lots of missions to Moon.

That article is from June 19, 2009. Is there any new developments regarding this?

NASA probably wanna take out that embarrassing moon tower! It's like a alien tongue being poked out at them!

reply to post by watchZEITGEISTnow


That is the best thing i have read today in the funny sense anyway thank you for that have not seen you around for a bit.
You know a lot will say it's not a bomb but an impact but i am undecided on that one.
S+F for your musical talent.

THANKYOU

AGREED! I dont think we should do anything like that to the Moon! We dont own it, its not ours to do what we please! What do they need to bomb it for they arent going to be honest with what they find anyways....NASA leave the moon alone!~

This will very much happen. Here's a link to the NASA site:

lcross.arc.nasa.gov...

I'm fortunate to live around Chicago and have signed up to witness the impact at the Adler Planetarium on Friday, Oct. 9th. There may be other observatories or universities near you that will have a viewing event as well.

But how else will we kill those peski clangers!

We need bomb the moon to show Ignignokt and Err that we're serious.

Those guys are jerks

Thanks for your replies guys!

I want you guys to add some of your own lines to the poem (or song)...

It still doesn't seem complete - and it has taken me a month to do


NASA don't bomb our Moon

You say you don't hide the facts
but you have not covered your tracks!

we all know there are ET galore
why not work on telling us more

Originally posted by mblahnikluver
AGREED! I dont think we should do anything like that to the Moon!

Too late. There have already been at least 47 impacts (some intentional, some not) into the Moon by man made objects. The Moon gets hit all the time by asteroids and meteorites. And they can impact at much greater speeds. I really don't get what the big deal is here.

...they arent going to be honest with what they find anyways

I assume by "they" you mean NASA. Well NASA won't be the only ones watching and studying the debris you know.

[edit on 2-10-2009 by jra]

I found this that I thought should be read..

ENTERED INTO FORCE: 11 July 1984


The States Parties to this Agreement,

Noting the achievements of States in the exploration and use of the moon
and other celestial bodies,

Recognizing that the moon, as a natural satellite of the earth, has an
important role to play in the exploration of outer space,

Determined to promote on the basis of equality the further development of
co-operation among States in the exploration and use of the moon and
other celestial bodies,

Desiring to prevent the moon from becoming an area of international
conflict,

Bearing in mind the benefits which may be derived from the exploitation
of the natural resources of the moon and other celestial bodies,

Recalling the Treaty on Principles Governing the Activities of States in
the Exploration and Use of Outer Space, including the Moon and Other
Celestial Bodies, the Agreement on the Rescue of Astronauts, the Return
of Astronauts and the Return of Objects Launched into Outer Space, the
Convention on International Liability for Damage Caused by Space Objects,
and the Convention on Registration of Objects Launched into Outer Space,

Taking into account the need to define and develop the provisions of
these international instruments in relation to the moon and other
celestial bodies, having regard to further progress in the exploration
and use of outer space,

Have agreed on the following:

Article 1

1. The provisions of this Agreement relating to the moon shall also apply
to other celestial bodies within the solar system, other than the earth,
except in so far as specific legal norms enter into force with respect to
any of these celestial bodies.

2. For the purposes of this Agreement reference to the moon shall include
orbits around or other trajectories to or around it.

3. This Agreement does not apply to extraterrestrial materials which
reach the surface of the earth by natural means.

Article 2

All activities on the moon, including its exploration and use, shall be
carried out in accordance with international law, in particular the
Charter of the United Nations, and taking into account the Declaration on
Principles of International Law concerning Friendly Relations and
Co-operation Among States in accordance with the Charter of the United
Nations, adopted by the General Assembly on 24 October 1970, in the
interests of maintaining international peace and security and promoting
international co-operation and mutual understanding, and with due regard
to the corresponding interests of all other States Parties.

Article 3

1. The moon shall be used by all States Parties exclusively for peaceful
purposes.

2. Any threat or use of force or any other hostile act or threat of
hostile act on the moon is prohibited. It is likewise prohibited to use
the moon in order to commit any such act or to engage in any such threat
in relation to the earth, the moon, spacecraft, the personnel of
spacecraft or man-made space objects.

3. States Parties shall not place in orbit around or other trajectory to
or around the moon objects carrying nuclear weapons or any other kinds of
weapons of mass destruction or place or use such weapons on or in the
moon.

4. The establishment of military bases, installations and fortifications,
the testing of any type of weapons and the conduct of military manoeuvres
on the moon shall be forbidden. The use of military personnel for
scientific research or for any other peaceful purposes shall not be
prohibited. The use of any equipment or facility necessary for peaceful
exploration and use of the moon shall also not be prohibited.

Article 4

1. The exploration and use of the moon shall be the province of all
mankind and shall be carried out for the benefit and in the interests of
all c

Could this be the Government's and NASA's plan all along? In order to disclose that there are indeed are/were Alien bases on the moon?

They know everyone will be watching closely with telescopes.

I say this because they might not want to come out with the truth and having to explain the whole "why did you keep it secret for all this time?" question that will come up.

Instead they will come out with the "new" discovery that there are ancient lunar ruins.

reply to post by muse7


Yes great theory - also perhaps setting the stage for a false flag alien "invasion", because I'm sure we as a population have been conditioned to believe someone that throws a bomb at your home, will probably get one sent right back to them (unfortunately).

Ohhhhhhh NASA don't bomb our (or is it their!?) Moon!!

why are all the nasa moon bombing threads locked? its really annoying when you want to discuss the issues in them.

to the person on one of them that thinks nasa is wonderful, the book 'dark side of the moon' might interest you. at least you should hear the other side of the story.

reply to post by ZeroKnowledge


well, zero knowledge, have you checked out the 'moon rising' videos? and all the nasa photos with smudgemarks on them? and the photo of the blue dome on the moon on lunacorp's website (under 'unknown moon')?

the moon may be inhabited.

which makes me wonder what the .... is going on ?

actually many indigenous cultures have stories that say the current moon wasnt the first orbiting earth; and that it was only steered into position a few thousand years ago like maybe 10 000 or 13000 BC (maybe around the time of the flood, i wonder?)
prior to that there were apparantly other moons around earth.

actually the fact that the moon rings like a bell when struck with a large object/projectile suggests the moon might be hollow. (natural satellites arent hollow. in other words, it suggests that the moon might be an artificially created satellite; or SPACESHIP.) perhaps this is why nasa keeps slamming projectiles into the moon. interestingly, the much villified von daniken spoke to top physicists about the best shape for an interstellar spaceship and they said a sphere; they were also seriously considering the idea of piloting the earth, as a spaceship, into another solar system when our sun gets too big. the physicists were, not evd and that was back then.

the moon isnt the only satellite with odd features. phobos and diemos of mars (fear and terror.. weird), are a little bit odd, too. in terms of their weight and orbit. suggestions have been made that these might be artificial too.

they should be careful cuz the moon is keeping the earth stable and tilted at precisely the right angle for human habitation. if the angle was different, the temperatures would be too extreme probably for life to have taken hold - certainly not in the comfortable temperature ranges we have now. also the earth would apparantly spin a lot faster and there would be extreme tides... not very habitable.

its a fact that scientists really dont know how the moon was formed. also the rocks on its surface arent as expected and dont really make sense. its rocks are also at least a billion years older than earth's i think.

a book 'who built the moon ' from amazon has interesting info; but this info is available from other sources too.

[edit on 10-10-2009 by rapunzel222]

[edit on 10-10-2009 by rapunzel222]

[edit on 10-10-2009 by rapunzel222]

Originally posted by rapunzel222

actually the fact that the moon rings like a bell when struck with a large object/projectile suggests the moon might be hollow.

If it were hollow it wouldn't have the mass that it has, and it would have a large effect on its rotational inertia, and by extension, its tidal effects.
www.engineeringtoolbox.com...
The moon is not a spaceship, it is not artificial. It's for reasons like this that I trust "the other side" less than I trust NASA.

Originally posted by watchZEITGEISTnow

You say you don't hide the facts
but you have not covered your tracks!

we all know there are ET galore
why not work on telling us more

Oh NASA why do you insist
the moon is just dust, ice and grit

You go shooting the breeze
with all those regressive ETs

Would you listen to Collier
if i say PLEASE!

Originally posted by Junglejuice

Originally posted by watchZEITGEISTnow

You say you don't hide the facts
but you have not covered your tracks!

we all know there are ET galore
why not work on telling us more

Oh NASA why do you insist
the moon is just dust, ice and grit

You go shooting the breeze
with all those regressive ETs

Would you listen to Collier
if i say PLEASE!

haha very good

Thanks!