It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
GENEVA — Iran agreed on Thursday in talks with the United States and other major powers to open its newly revealed uranium enrichment plant near Qum to international inspection in the next two weeks and to send most of its openly declared enriched uranium outside Iran to be turned into fuel for a small reactor that produces medical isotopes, senior American and other Western officials said.
Originally posted by CanadianDream420
So, what was Israels take on this?
Originally posted by pavil
reply to post by Agit8dChop
Iran has a history of concealing it's nuclear projects.
Originally posted by Agit8dChop
reply to post by InfaRedMan
I agree 100%.
But, If Israel can have nukes, so can Iran. it keeps the peace.
I dont agree with Irans policies, but they are under no obligation to let the US and Israel dictate their policies.
Originally posted by InfaRedMan
Originally posted by pavil
reply to post by Agit8dChop
Iran has a history of concealing it's nuclear projects.
How is this any different to Israel? That's my question! The only difference is that one of them has a bunch of Zionist traitors to humanity that are instrumental in bringing about a NWO... so that makes it OK. Iran will be invaded as scheduled! The truth is no object!
IRM
Originally posted by Harlequin
reply to post by buddhasystem
apparnatly you shoot your mouth before researching anything;
the reactor operating in tehran is under teh near permanat guidance of the IAEA
oh wait you knew that didnt you?
the plutonium that iran has had for 20 years - is still under the seals from teh 80`s
again you knew this right?
However, the IAEA says that in 2003, after the main enrichment plant at Natanz was discovered, Iran agreed on what's called a Subsidiary Arrangement to its safeguards agreement, under which it would inform the IAEA of any new facility at the preliminary design stage. Iran later repudiated this arrangement, saying that it had not been ratified by its parliament but the IAEA says that no such unilateral repudiation is allowed.
So Western governments argue that Iran did violate the rules. The IAEA agrees.