Originally posted by redhatty
Supreme Court Justice Noah Haynes Swayne: "All persons born in the allegiance of the king are natural- born subjects, and all persons born in the allegiance of the United States are natural-born citizens. Birth and allegiance go together. Such is the rule of the common law, and it is the common law of this country…since as before the Revolution." United States v. Rhodes, 27 Fed. Cas. 785 (1866).
According to that, if birth and allegiance go together, and Obama was born in the US, then his allegiance is to the US, not to the country of his father's citizenship.
Do you recognize that people cannot be forced to follow conflicting laws of 2 different countries?
...do you really think that someone as intelligent as Obama seems to be would simply overlook things like how the different nationality his father had would have affected him?
I have no way of knowing that. His study of his father seems to be of the person he was, not the legal citizenship of his father.
The original United States Naturalization Law of March 26, 1790 stated "the children of citizens [ed. note the plural of citizens] of the United States that may be born beyond Sea, or out of the limits of the United States, shall be considered as natural born Citizens".
The word "children" is plural, too. The plural of citizen has no special significance in this case.
Yet even today, United States Federal law (8 U.S.C. § 1401) which lists 10 different types of categories of person who are United States citizens from birth, makes specific differentiation between a person born in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof and every other category.
And Obama was born in the US and subject to the jurisdiction thereof. Are you thinking that Obama was NOT subject to the jurisdiction of the US by way of his father's citizenship? He was.
“persons born in the United States who are foreigners, aliens, who belong to the families of ambassadors or foreign ministers.”
And do you think Obama fits that category, being born to one US citizen and one non-citizen? Do you think Obama is a foreigner, alien, or belongs to the family of an ambassador or foreign minister? Is there ANY reason to believe that?
So you tell me, how can someone of dual citizenship be under "full and complete jurisdiction" of the United States and yet still be under the jurisdiction of another country?
They cannot. That's my point. He was born in the US and under full and complete jurisdiction of the United States.
Dual citizenship means that the laws of two countries consider him a citizen. It does NOT mean that he holds allegiance to two countries. A subtle but very important distinction.


This one is really about Donofrio's actions v Hawaii.
) and we are not going to be able to come to a definitive answer because we simply don't
have a definition of the phrase "natural born citizen".
we have learned each other's opinions
of what an NBC is. 
