It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
I don't know how this thread got to be about Obama
Obama has shown his legal papers to the world. Just because some don't accept doesn't change a thing.
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
Obama has shown his legal papers to the world.
Originally posted by Mak Manto
I mean, what about the Hawaiian newspaper that showed his birth?
Originally posted by Mak Manto
Actually, Obama showed his birth certificate both ON AND OFF the internet.
Obama was born within the United States.
Originally posted by Mak Manto
Originally posted by I_am_Spartacus
RINO!!
You know this place (ATS) is crazy. A conspiracy site that has so many who believe in althenians and greens in cahoots with our government for the purpose of soul mining, or that Pee Wee Hermann is dead from over stimulation but his twin has taken his place, but a large number can't see a REAL conspiracy right before their eyes.
Yes sure it probably isn't about the birth certificate, its probably something else and if he lets the focus stay on the BC then his other records are safe BUT how can ANY of you say it isn't conspiratorial for obama to not just show his records already or use lawyers to block disclosure?
You really think there isn't a problem SOMEWHERE with some part of his past? Isn't it obvious that there is something he doesn't want us to see? He is intentionally keeping us all from seeing it yet you see nothing wrong with that ? Really? cmon.....
Actually, Obama showed his birth certificate both ON AND OFF the internet.
Obama was born within the United States.
Originally posted by desert
And could this distancing be a play to become a 2012 front runner?
Or would someone like Graham speak one way in public but wink ala Palin to this base?
Is this strong rebuke from a politician the first shot fired in a battle to take back the party or merely a shot across the bow of a boat filled with a base gone wild?
Having groomed this type of media and base over three decades, maybe the only thing Graham is trying to accomplish with his remarks is to sacrifice one of their own, to cut loose some reeds that accidentally got tangled in the propeller.
Originally posted by desert
Would Graham be able to speak out about Rush Limbaugh or Sean Hannity without apologizing?
Originally posted by micpsi
When some of you "anti-birthers" can better understand what constitutes scientific proof (as opposed to mere legal evidence), we shall take you more seriously.
...foreign citizenship makes no difference under US law if one is also a US citizen.
...
If a person is a US citizen and is currently within the jurisdiction of the US, any other citizenship(s) he or she may hold are really not relevant in US law.
A "dual citizen" has no special status in the US by virtue of holding citizenship in some other country too.
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
I'd love to see someone stand up to them and take the conservative party back. Better yet, start a new conservative party.
Originally posted by desert
reply to post by Lillydale
True, by numbers. But look at the way the march and townhalls were used by politicians to say that Americans, meaning a majority, agreed with the protesters. The IMAGE of the protests was enough for politicians to go back to their committees and imply that American citizens don't want what the Obama administration wants for them.
Originally posted by micpsi
When some of you "anti-birthers" can better understand what constitutes scientific proof (as opposed to mere legal evidence), we shall take you more seriously.
Originally posted by Lillydale
... I continue to be completely dumfounded as to how politicians were able to convince each other of something that every poll, census, NEWS story was telling was wrong and that Glenn's manufactured and then hugely inflated little parade was reality.
He speculated that Fox News host Bill O'Reilly would complain that "Ben Franklin [is] giving in on something."
Originally posted by micpsi
Originally posted by Mak Manto
Originally posted by I_am_Spartacus
RINO!!
You know this place (ATS) is crazy. A conspiracy site that has so many who believe in althenians and greens in cahoots with our government for the purpose of soul mining, or that Pee Wee Hermann is dead from over stimulation but his twin has taken his place, but a large number can't see a REAL conspiracy right before their eyes.
Yes sure it probably isn't about the birth certificate, its probably something else and if he lets the focus stay on the BC then his other records are safe BUT how can ANY of you say it isn't conspiratorial for obama to not just show his records already or use lawyers to block disclosure?
You really think there isn't a problem SOMEWHERE with some part of his past? Isn't it obvious that there is something he doesn't want us to see? He is intentionally keeping us all from seeing it yet you see nothing wrong with that ? Really? cmon.....
Actually, Obama showed his birth certificate both ON AND OFF the internet.
Obama was born within the United States.
No, all Obama has shown is his Certificate of Live Birth, not his original birth certificate. The former is just a print-out of data from a health department computer in Hawaii of information provided by Obama's parents. It certainly does not prove that he was born in Hawaii. Sidney Ann Dunham could have lied about giving birth to him in Hawaii if she thought disclosing that he was born of a British father in a foreign country might make her son British. Which in fact it DID.
When some of you "anti-birthers" can better understand what constitutes scientific proof (as opposed to mere legal evidence), we shall take you more seriously.
Originally posted by Pappie54
This was an unbelievable thread, like several people talking through others,
Originally posted by vor78
That said, even though Lindsey Graham appears to have gotten this one at least partially right, at least in a 'blind squirrel' kind of way, I still think he's a toad. I think he's a guy who will say absolutely anything if he believes its to his political advantage.
Two senior Republican senators say the United States, and not Israel, should attack Iran if military action becomes "necessary."
They also say a simple strike at the country's nuclear capability wouldn't be enough -- the US would have to launch an "all-or-nothing" war against Iran with the aim of crippling the country's military capabilities.
...
But Graham doesn't think an attack should be limited to airstrikes on Iran's nuclear facilities. "If we use military action against Iran, we should not only go after their nuclear facilities. We should destroy their ability to make conventional war. They should have no planes that can fly and no ships that can float," said Graham.