It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by weedwhacker
reply to post by Donny 4 million
Oh, "Donny"...if it was a snake it woulda bit ya!!!
"Tom Flocco", and whoever he cites as 'sources' have been shown to be full of it. ESPECIALLY when it comes to the claims of the engine debris, and wheel hubs.
www.911myths.com...
Just ONE sample website that blows away the "A-3" fantasy...so, time to drop that one, it ain't lookin' too good anymore.
Originally posted by Donny 4 million
Originally posted by weedwhacker
reply to post by Donny 4 million
Oh, "Donny"...if it was a snake it woulda bit ya!!!
"Tom Flocco", and whoever he cites as 'sources' have been shown to be full of it. ESPECIALLY when it comes to the claims of the engine debris, and wheel hubs.
www.911myths.com...
Just ONE sample website that blows away the "A-3" fantasy...so, time to drop that one, it ain't lookin' too good anymore.
I found nothing about Tom Flocco in your links at all.
However, when we question the members of 911truth.org, or Tom Flocco, or Dylan Avery, or other self-appointed 9/11 truth seekers, we are reprimanded.
What is the purpose of Tom Flocco's site? There is no intelligent or original research or analysis on his site:
www.tomflocco.com...
If we could delete Tom Flocco's site, Karl Schwarz's site, and most of the other 9/11 sites, and leave only the few that actually have some intelligent information, it would increase the rate at which we educate people.
Originally posted by scott3x
Originally posted by weedwhacker
...Reason I brought it up was to dispel one of the P4T myths they bring up, about the "incredible" rate of descent of AAL 77, and the "impossible" pull to the nearly level last few feet of the flight path. This they "calculate" the way I did, just from watching the animation video; timing the change in altitude to determine a rate of descent in feet per minute.
That's not my understanding. My understanding is that they calculated the necessary pull up based on the CSV file.
Originally posted by scott3x
Originally posted by weedwhacker
IF they have the actual FDR data from the IVVI then they're ignoring it. Maybe they don't have it.
My understanding is that they have all the FDR data. I'm not sure why you think they're ignoring it.
Originally posted by weedwhacker
Just to set the record, straight again....there is NOTHING wrong with the "Flight path" (per the OP) of the (air)plane that approached the Pentagon!!!
Originally posted by Boone 870
Originally posted by scott3x
I find your assertions to be interesting. However, I don't think you've considered the possibility that the official flight path is false. If it was, then Mineta's assertions might not be innacurate. It would seem that his assertions might favour a north of the citgo gas station approach, which would be in keeping with the many videotaped witnesses that CIT interviewed.
I've considered it, and I've chosen to rely on what the air traffic controllers, who watched flight 77 approach the Pentagon, had to say.
You can read their statements here, starting on page 145.
You can also hear an air traffic controller describing 77's flight path as it happened, in this video:
www.youtube.com...
Originally posted by IrnBruFiend
Just a minor point probably irrelevant to the exact thread
Just delighted to see we have a pilotsfor911truth website
I think that's fantastic
I feel less isolated on this topic the more I see websites like this come to light
Does anybody know if there's anymore? I know we have Aefor911truth as well
I hope uncovering 9/11 can be the initiation of an enlightened society and then from that point I don't know
I don't want the fact that we're disposable assets to become a part of anybody's psyche.
Originally posted by scott3x
I took a look at both; the problem is that both of those things are too technical for me. Perhaps turbofan or someone else on the truther side could take a look at them.
Originally posted by weedwhackerHuh? Show us, please. OTHER than just your opinion.
Firstly, it seems that your focus on the nature of Class B Airspace, and misunderstanding about how important you think it is is at the core of your miscomprehension. Secondly, the realization that "(y)our country was under attack" had just been made, mere MINUTES prior...do you think that there was some possiblity of instantaneous response? Like, in a movie??
Originally posted by weedwhacker
Credibility is shot when ...
The FDR data, it fits very well, and comports with the FAA radar, the RADES and the ATC recordings.
pilotsfor911truth.org...
pilotsfor911truth.org...
pilotsfor911truth.org...
pilotsfor911truth.org...
pilotsfor911truth.org...
pilotsfor911truth.org...
Originally posted by turbofan
reply to post by scott3x
FYI: Rob is still capable and certified by FAA to fly aircraft. His medical
condition does not prevent him from maintaining his pilot status.
Most people aren't aware as he doesn't make his personal life public.
Originally posted by Donny 4 million
Originally posted by scott3x
Has he voiced worry? I actually haven't seen his view on the possibility of a reinvestigation.
No you won't see it or hear it.
Denial is manifest in a mind synonymous with alcoholism.
The reality of an actual flight path of a particular 911 tragedy aircraft can be easily distorted by fears instilled by those that control your every paranoia.