posted on Oct, 6 2009 @ 02:25 AM
reply to post by Bspiracy
reply to post by IgnoreTheFacts
I'm sorry you feel that way. Not to mention I can't really see how you come to that conclusion so easily, you base your opinion off nothing as far
as I see it. And when you get back to me with something worthy I'd like to give it a chance.
reply to post by watchZEITGEISTnow
Firstly, I see where you come from in saying disclosure would mean a way of rapidly spreading the energy solution.
In some respects you are correct - His goal is to get away with what he gets away with by just talking about the energy issue without actually solving
it like he may or may not have the hard evidence to do. This is exactly why he makes connections. And this also happens to be the answer to what you
asked me to comment on.
With the Clintons - Yeah, Greer briefed the Clinton administration on UFOs. He wanted to get Clinton to disclose everything. It's actually really
similar to what's going on right now, the Obama administration wants to do the same and try to regain control over extraterrestrial policy... They
won't succeed though... Anyway, Greer encouraged disclosure to Clinton and the CIA, and the only thing that Clinton ever said to Greer about really
going through with it was that he didn't want to end up like Jack Kennedy. So it never happened. His association with Clinton was basically an
attempt to put the control of the UFO Policy into the hands of the president, rather than this underground and very powerful UFO corporate cartel. I
mean isn't that the way it should be? If it could be on the constitution it would.
With Lawrence Rockefeller, yeah people think that their friendship means that he has to be a NWO control faction. That is so idiotic it needs no
comment. Let's say by horrible chance they're working together... What if since Rockefeller is powerful and Greer has the info, they can help
disclose the information together? What if Rockefeller got a hold of this ET technology and replaced it with our current means? Wouldn't that in
actuality be a good thing - A better thing than what we're doing to the planet now? Sure he's still a rich bastard, but at least we're using a
clean energy source and it has the ability to go widespread. That's just saying IF they really are working together...
Saying ALL ETs are friendly and benevolent - What do you mean by 'ALL'? Did Greer ever even use the word 'all'? Does 'all' account for in the
entire universe? To be more specific, it may be certain that the ETs who have come in contact with Earth are all benevolent. Earth is still standing,
hasn't been wiped out / harvested, etc. But somewhere else in the Universe where there are beings who we have not seen the likes of yet... I'm sure
malevolent ETs dwell. So you may simply say that 'all the ETs we have supposedly seen the likes of' have been benevolent. But that doesn't account
for the entire universe, no of course not. I'm sure he knows that.
I do agree with the necessity for hard questioning which is also why I even bothered watching the entire Camelot interview in the first place. I
wanted to see someone try and challenge Greer but in the end that attempt simply failed and I mean we all know why... Either way, that could've been
just because Camelot were the wrong people to try and challenge him.
I hope that answered all your questions.