Can science be a religion?, page 2

reply to post by karl 12

---

Pardon me if I am mistaken on the "Ego" thing, but I think I know why it was said.
Evolution states that we are "evolving" and getting closer and closer to perfection.
Religion (most of them) states that somehow or another man messed up along the way and now we are "infected" with sin and the only one that can cleanse us is a deity.

Is that was was meant by science appealing to the ego?

Originally posted by sisgood
Evolution states that we are "evolving" and getting closer and closer to perfection.

No it doesn't - that is a common misconception.



As for the thread topic -these quotes by astronomer Carl Sagan make for some pretty interesting reading:

"Science is not only compatible with spirituality; it is a profound source of spirituality."
Carl Sagan



"Think of how many religions attempt to validate themselves with prophecy. Think of how many people rely on these prophecies, however vague, however unfulfilled, to support or prop up their beliefs. Yet has there ever been a religion with the prophetic accuracy and reliability of science?"
Carl Sagan



"There has been a long and painful history of erroneous claims which religions have made about the nature of the world…There is hardly an organized religion with a firm body of doctrine which has not at one time or another persecuted people for the crime of open inquiry."
Carl Sagan



"If we long to believe that the stars rise and set for us, that we are the reason there is a Universe, does science do us a disservice in deflating our conceits?....For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring."
Carl Sagan

atheism.about.com...

[edit on 02/10/08 by karl 12]

reply to post by sisgood

---

No, science is not a religion.

A religion postulates an absolute truth, for instance, the beginning of the universe was created by an all powerful omnipotent supernatural entity. This absolute truth goes with out question to it's validity, it is automatically assumed to be true without testing to be true.

Science on the other hand is a method of discovery, it never postulates an absolute truth. Of all the thing's we do hold as true, none of them are held as absolutely true as new discoveries and observations could denounce the validity of what was previously held as truth.

Seeing as how science can not and does not hold anything as an absolute truth, it is inherently separated from any form of religious faith that naturally assumes absolute truths.

I personally find those whom hold faith in absolute truths to be more lazy in scientific discoveries and advancements. One can not properly understand the universe or our existence if one holds an absolute faith in nothing more than an assumption that one thing is true and can never be false nor has ever actually been attempted to be proven.

Reality is, religious doctrines are dangerous. At the time of monotheistic birth, the God of the bible was a just God as how the people and culture existed in that period of time and acted accordingly to mans laws and thoughts. Nowadays, not a single religious person would claim that the justifications of that God are moral enough to carry out. We've abolished slavery, we've abolished child abuse, we've abolished oppression of women etc. etc. etc. Those were all 'good' and 'just' thing's according to the biblical God.

Which is why I find it rather odd and funny that those of religious leanings tend to write atheists off as the evil people who reject God. I can't recall a single atheist mass grouping who has committed genocides in the name of atheism, but this is certainly a trend of violent actions committed by the religious folks. Certainly, one would assume that one's group actions shows the true nature of that group. When a religious group can justify horrific atrocities as being 'just' and 'right' according to their God, then who are the real evil ones?

reply to post by sisgood

---

Well, I'd disagree with saying Atheism is a religion; it's more of a point of view(just as monotheism, polytheism, etc. aren't religions per-say).

That said, I do think there's a danger in the 'cult' of science. What I mean by cult of science is the offhand dismissal of anything which doesn't fit a person's world views, especially the moving of the scientific bar for subjects a person doesn't like(e.g. "Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence."). So many seem to forget that science is constantly evolving, and that a stale, fixed mindset means the death of real science.

This is really the major problem that humanity has been plagued with since the dawn of history, though, and is not a failure of science but of the human mind. If someone comes up with something we don't like, we move the goalposts; or we attack them instead of the claims; or we go to war with them, and so on.

So it goes.

[edit on 10-10-2009 by Core90]

Why are these 10 figures just like Jesus Christ??
  Posted 7 days ago with 14 member flags

What if all the major religions started out with the same story and it slowly diverged from there
  Posted 9 days ago with 11 member flags

I am an imposter in Church
  Posted 6 days ago with 11 member flags

What Kind of Christianity Is This?
  Posted 18 days ago with 7 member flags

The Great Flood Was Caused By A Comet?
  Posted 13 days ago with 7 member flags

Advert claiming cure through prayer is banned
  Posted 7 days ago with 7 member flags

The real Jewish people. Torah Jews Against ZIONISM
  Posted 15 days ago with 6 member flags

The World Is in Desperate Need of Heretics!
  Posted 12 days ago with 6 member flags

Newest topics, updated in real-time:

Newest topics getting flags, in real-time:

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time: