Carl Cameron Secretly filmed by WeAreChange, page 1
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 10 times
Topic started on 30-9-2009 @ 08:53 PM by Blundo


Lots of good info about the 9/11 coverup. Cameron starts talking about some 9/11 secrets and he has no idea he is being filmed. At the end he was asked if he would speak out about 9/11, he said he can't(watch video why), but i guess his job is to valuable to lose.

Thats the main problem today, their no safety. do you

A. Stay the way you live and hope it doesn't get worst

or

B. Fight for truth about 9/11, and lose all safety among yourself, and stuggle until its proven.


I see it this way. I do support a new 9/11 investigation but it would take years to have everyone involved in the 9/11 coverup to just be put on a jury, let alone put in jail. Not all corruption will be gone out of the government, a bill or something need to be put in place which will straighten up the MSM, Government etc.


reply posted on 30-9-2009 @ 09:58 PM by TheAntiHero420
reply to post by ecoparity





That guy will never say a word about anything on or off camera again.


He probably won't, true.


He made a good point about a bridge too far. Too bad the WAC guys missed the lesson on that. If I were in their place I would have hung onto this guy as an inside source rather than burning his ass.


Nobody ever believes an undocumented inside source.


Just letting him know that conversation was on tape and that it will stay locked away in a box somewhere would have earned his eternal gratitude.


I doubt it, probably would have wanted the tape.

[edit on 9/30/2009 by TheAntiHero420]


reply posted on 30-9-2009 @ 10:51 PM by ecoparity
reply to post by TheAntiHero420



Documented inside source? There's no such thing until after they are no longer inside.

I don't see the value in burning the guy, he didn't blow the lid off anything and what they have done is insure no one will ever speak to these guys off the record again.


reply posted on 30-9-2009 @ 10:58 PM by TheAntiHero420
Originally posted by ecoparity
reply to
post by TheAntiHero420



Documented inside source? There's no such thing until after they are no longer inside.

I don't see the value in burning the guy, he didn't blow the lid off anything and what they have done is insure no one will ever speak to these guys off the record again.


Yeah, but I think the point of the matter is they got him to talk without all the corporate bs. Its been said and can't be taken back now.


reply posted on 30-9-2009 @ 11:06 PM by warrenb
reply to post by Blundo



wow
this is interesting stuff



s/f



reply posted on 30-9-2009 @ 11:30 PM by tezzajw
reply to post by talisman


Whatever they have won't matter in six months time - nothing does. The public has a six month memory and then all is forgotten, except for the die-hard crusaders.

That's why politicians get away with their lies. No one cares.

Good luck to WAC, though. I give them credit for doing what they do.
Pages:     ^^TOP^^



9-11 lecture at Basel University, Switzerland.
  Posted 13 days ago with 14 member flags
9/11 Actors re-visited
  Posted 7 days ago with 13 member flags
Wikipedia categorizes 9/11 truth as \'denialism\'
  Posted 18 days ago with 11 member flags
Building Collapses in Rio
  Posted 14 days ago with 6 member flags
new film "Human the film (2012)" covers all the bases and more!
  Posted 8 days ago with 6 member flags