It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by JimOberg
Does the picture of the grinning kid next to a ladder, on that same roll of film, have any significance?
Originally posted by Arrowmancer
3. A ladder or device for elevation
Originally posted by colloredbrothers
Originally posted by Arrowmancer
To date, these are the only photographs that cannot be completely debunked.
What about Billy Meiers case? This guy had one arm one camera and amazing photos that also can't be debunked.
That a pretty bold statement to make imo
Amazing photos of garbage can lids, thumbtacks, a plastic ray gun toy, a tin foil suit, photos of Pteradons that match book illustrations perfectly, and a photo of an Alien that shares DNA with a department store catalog model. Nope, can't be debunked...unless you have seen toy guns, tin foil, or Meiers' barn where he keeps his model UFOs.
Originally posted by Arrowmancer
reply to post by Lillydale
Amazing photos of garbage can lids, thumbtacks, a plastic ray gun toy, a tin foil suit, photos of Pteradons that match book illustrations perfectly, and a photo of an Alien that shares DNA with a department store catalog model. Nope, can't be debunked...unless you have seen toy guns, tin foil, or Meiers' barn where he keeps his model UFOs.
Please provide the sources for this information. Sorry, i was distracted by the 'WARNING' box under your avatar.
The most likely way of hoaxing these photos would be, in my opinion, to suspend a photo or painting of the UFO at some distance, with that photo or painting made in a way to make it look as seen through some mist
Yes, I was warned so that must mean that I have no idea what I was talking about. The other guy has two warns so I guess according to you, I won. This thread is not about Billy, so please start one and I would be happy to. You know what might be easier? Read one of the hundreds of threads already debunking Meier.
Originally posted by Arrowmancer
um... no... teh fact that your post added absolutely nothing to the conversation says that you had nothing to add. Very logical. Your warning was because you were opinionated and 4 pages of the post about the warning in general was because the entire thread or most of it was bashing/baiting. I assume, I didn't read it.
All I'm saying is that the things you pointed out were basis for examination and they have been ruled right out.l EVERYTHING that you stated. I was simply hoping for some foundation for you to have based your opinion on. Differing argument backed up with proof or even logical thought are welcome, but apparently nonexistant in this particular case.
Again, please provide references.
So you make your judgments about the content of a page by NOT reading it? If you did not read and you do not know what you are talking about, then do not offer your little fantasies. You have no idea what the warning was for, and as you admit - you do not even care to try to read to find out. Shhhhh.
Originally posted by Arrowmancer
reply to post by Lillydale
So you make your judgments about the content of a page by NOT reading it? If you did not read and you do not know what you are talking about, then do not offer your little fantasies. You have no idea what the warning was for, and as you admit - you do not even care to try to read to find out. Shhhhh.
I didn't read it because I COULDN'T. I trust the site administrators' judgement on the REMOVAL of posts. In the case you got the warning on, the entire thread was removed adn the reason stated was
"This post was removed because it contained mostly personal attacks rather than productive debate."
I don't hold it against you, that's why I brought up the fact that you'd been previously warned for something that could have been similar. As yet, you've still provided nothing towards the original topic, though you've slammed it without any apparent basis.
I'm INVITING you to provide some basis for those opinions. I welcome debate in all of it's forms, but people that just spout off their opinions without explaining why just detract from the issue.
I say these photographs are probably the real deal due to the fact that testimony FOR their validity has come from multiple sources that focus on the research of related subjects. I say they are real because there is little to no credibility on the part of those who challenge them or claim they aren't, and because no one has shown me anything that would force me re-evaluate them.
You say otherwise. I challenge you to provide the proof. It's that simple. In THIS thread. That's what this thread is HERE for.
Originally posted by Arrowmancer
reply to post by Lillydale
Amazing photos of garbage can lids, thumbtacks, a plastic ray gun toy, a tin foil suit, photos of Pteradons that match book illustrations perfectly, and a photo of an Alien that shares DNA with a department store catalog model. Nope, can't be debunked...unless you have seen toy guns, tin foil, or Meiers' barn where he keeps his model UFOs.
Please provide the sources for this information. Sorry, i was distracted by the 'WARNING' box under your avatar.
It looks to me like maybe a hubcap or something. It's hard to gauge, but there doesn't seem to be an impression of size.
Credibility means nothing. Who are these people?
Originally posted by Arrowmancer
As far as being distracted by the 'warning' box under the avatar, I'll admit, it came off as a cheap shot, but wasn't meant to. The WARNING, for whatever reason, was made. To me, the cause of the warning of the post in question was reason enough to call that person out to explain the opinion put forth, which didn't happen.