It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by John Matrix
I agree with Woopi when she says: "I don't like it when we're passionate about something and we don't have all the facts."
Originally posted by McGinty
We all like to condemn the TPTB for their misuse of power, but i sense that many here would misuse it just as callously if there was a button you could press at home that said 'GUILTY', despite not really having a clue about facts.
Originally posted by John Matrix
Forced sex is wrong, it's assualt.
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
Legally, he committed statutory rape. There's no doubt.
Originally posted by John Matrix
If there was solid evidence of any mitigating circumstances, there would have been no plea deal.
Originally posted by Freenrgy2
Originally posted by John Matrix
Forced sex is wrong, it's assualt.
This is exactly my problem with all of the libs out there reporting on this.
Let me make it plain for you to understand...
FORCED SEX IS RAPE!!!!!!!!!
Got it now? Start calling it for what it really is and stop trying to lessen the severity of the situation.
Originally posted by John Matrix
Originally posted by Freenrgy2
Originally posted by John Matrix
Forced sex is wrong, it's assualt.
This is exactly my problem with all of the libs out there reporting on this.
Let me make it plain for you to understand...
FORCED SEX IS RAPE!!!!!!!!!
Got it now? Start calling it for what it really is and stop trying to lessen the severity of the situation.
I don't disagree with you, so settle down.
I'm just saying we don't have all the facts and we should try to remain calm and impartial.
Originally posted by Victoria 1
reply to post by McGinty
to answer your question, the court transcripts are available. He admitted to giving this CHILD drugs and having sex with her front and back. You are a sick person to say that is not as bad. the girl was 13... HELLLLLO!!!!!
Originally posted by Blanca Rose
Originally posted by John Matrix
If there was solid evidence of any mitigating circumstances, there would have been no plea deal.
Oh, really?
Money talks, and b.s. walks.
Somebody got paid off for that plea deal, in my opinion.
Originally posted by TravelerintheDark
This was not a statutory case as that would indicate the girl was willing and compliant but under age of consent.
Originally posted by John Matrix
I don't disagree with you, so settle down.
I'm just saying we don't have all the facts and we should try to remain calm and impartial.
Things were also much different back in the early 70's and the social climate in Hollywood during the 70's is not exception. He may not have known her age and she may have been very precocious. That still doesn't make it right, but how many men ask for ID even today?
Originally posted by Freenrgy2
Originally posted by John Matrix
I don't disagree with you, so settle down.
I'm just saying we don't have all the facts and we should try to remain calm and impartial.
Things were also much different back in the early 70's and the social climate in Hollywood during the 70's is not exception. He may not have known her age and she may have been very precocious. That still doesn't make it right, but how many men ask for ID even today?
Apparently, we do disagree. You call it assault, and I call is what it really is...RAPE. All of your posts on the matter come from the basis of getting all of the "facts". The facts are plain; Polanski raped a minor. He has run from the law and he's finally going to pay for his crime.
Originally posted by nepafogo
c'mon people if MJ can get away with it why not Polanski? Seriously though Whoopi and the other Hollywood tards that think that this is not "rape-rape" should experience what this 13 year old did and then tell us how they feel. I suggest maybe one night in general population at a max security. Since when does a 13 year old girl understand actions and the consequences of those actions? My god their brains are still developing at 13 years old, yet some of them think they know everything about anything and that nothing can happen to them. The guy is a perv (pedophile comes to mind) and should be charged with at minimum statutory rape and providing alcohol and drugs to a minor .
Hollywood and the rest of the "elite" are so *snip* in the head it is
sickening. I agree boycott the entire propoganda of Hollywood and TV as it is truly nothing more than a huge "time vampire". I find ATS more interesting and mind opening than either of them combined. There is a wealth of knowledge out there you just need to wade through a bit of garbage to find it.
Mod Edit: Profanity/Circumvention Of Censors – Please Review This Link.
[edit on 1-10-2009 by GAOTU789]
Originally posted by TheColdDragon
reply to post by Aeons
I don't care what you think of me, you are the kind of people I hate; so wrapped up in your own self righteous life and a belief that there is such a thing as "ABSOLUTE" Morals.
You haven't pity for people who have no control over their attractions, people born outside of what society considers to be "NORMAL".
Me? I am normal. Society agrees with my particular attractions, or else why the hundreds of websites counting down the days for the Olsen Twins? For Natalie Portman? Christina Ricci? Any number of other female stars?
Males, in general, lust after pubescent girls. Deny it all you like, maybe you're one of the rare percentage of people who have the particular attraction only to "Age Appropriate" people; that would be ABnormal, just as ABnormal as Paedophiles are.
You may be one end of the bellcurve, but I'm on neither.