It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by v3_exceed
Originally posted by Aeons
Boys in an age appropriate sexual exploratory relationship is not rape.
That this isn't clear to you is disturbing.
Actually it is. In many states consensual sex between minors is not legal. In addition, these same laws apply if parental consent has not been given even if both parties has consented.
Currently many US citizens are being arrested for "Sexting" under the laws meant to protect children from being exploited in child pornography. In these cases the victim is also the perpetrator. Nice draconian system you have there.
The entire concept is quite clear to me, I assure you. What IS disturbing, is that you and many others, refuse to consider the motivation of the accuser(s) in these kinds of cases or consider that a "Pure underage girl" could have the type of personality that would all her to be manipulative, how very 70's of you.
Either you are unable or unwilling to see the logic of my earlier posts and chose to spout bible nonsense in your attempt to deride my position. In any case you have proven yourself to be entirely without logic and now beneath my contempt, and only deserving my pity.
..ex
Originally posted by Aeons
Nope. I live in a country with a close in age exception.
Praticality trumps.
Originally posted by v3_exceed
Originally posted by Aeons
Nope. I live in a country with a close in age exception.
Praticality trumps.
One has to wonder why your country would have come up with that.
Could it be the large number of people being arrested, the number of lives destroyed before that exception?
..ex
Originally posted by AmethystSD
I don't understand why kids and their boyfriends/girlfriends keep coming up in this thread when it is about a man who was 44 and a girl who was 13. It seems like certain people are completely ignoring the facts in this case and using it as an excuse to get on a soap box about something that is not entirely related.
Originally posted by FredT
*sniff sniff* I smell a pedofile here with that kind of justification :up; What are you doing? Reading out of some NAMBLA talking points booklet?
Originally posted by Aeons
Boys in an age appropriate sexual exploratory relationship is not rape.
That this isn't clear to you is disturbing.
Originally posted by TheColdDragon
A young female, in particular, has a greater chance of lifestyle sustainability with an older man than with a male her own age. Fact.
Rape, on the other hand, happens to be a crime. Also fact.
Originally posted by TheColdDragon
reply to post by Aeons
And I'd argue all the men you know are incapable of forming a discerned position on a topic and let the fabricated rage of society speak for them rather than having the cojones to form their own opinion.
I am glad not to be such a person.
Originally posted by TheColdDragon
Originally posted by FredT
*sniff sniff* I smell a pedofile here with that kind of justification :up; What are you doing? Reading out of some NAMBLA talking points booklet?
No, I'm not a Paedophile. Possibly an EPHEBOPHILE or a HEBOPHILE, but not a Pedophile... and whereas it concerns being sexually attracted, I find most teenagers to be revoltingly immature. Maybe physically attractive, but most I couldn't stand being in the same room as for extended periods of time on account of their terminal case of stupid.
Being attracted to something is DIFFERENT from deciding you're going to go out and rape someone. And I happen to know some Paedophiles, so yes, I will defend their attraction. What I won't do is defend someone who rapes anyone, because rape by definition is coerced and force-based.
From what I have heard of the Polanski case, yes he raped someone... but the situation itself smacks of something suspicious in the overall events that transpired. Whoopi was pointing out that people should talk about what HAPPENED, rather than vomit up their idiotic sensibilities about sex and thirteen year olds and have a NON-conversation.
I am defending Whoopi's right to disagree with the others on the show, because I frankly agree with her; sensationalizing is sickening, talk facts.
Originally posted by TheColdDragon
reply to post by Aeons
Oh, I'm well aware that you're the sort of Cretin who is incapable of conceiving of someone below the age of consent actually consenting.
You have NO need of persuading me of that. It nevertheless makes you a cretin.
Fact: Your response to your daughter/niece/sister of age 13 having sex with another 13 year old is different from your response to them having sex with a 40 year old. Reason? Because the 40 year old is ALWAYS taking advantage in your mind.
Epic Fail.