It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The researchers found differences in how often mothers used physical discipline and the mothers' perceptions of how often other parents used physical discipline. Specifically:
* Mothers in Thailand were least likely to physically discipline their children, followed by mothers in China, the Philippines, Italy, India, and Kenya, with mothers in Kenya most likely to physically discipline their children.
* More frequent use of physical discipline was less strongly associated with child aggression and anxiety when it was perceived as being more culturally accepted, but physical discipline was also associated with more aggression and anxiety regardless of the perception of cultural acceptance.
* In countries in which physical discipline was more common and culturally accepted, children who were physically disciplined were less aggressive and less anxious than children who were physically disciplined in countries where physical discipline was rarely used.
* In all countries, however, higher use of physical discipline was associated with more child aggression and anxiety.
Originally posted by kingoftheworld
Whatever, i believe that it is propaganda. I was spanked as a child nothing wrong with me. I mean I think that it is part of a movement for the goverment to start taking more rights away from parents.
There once was an Auburn football player and biology major who decided to perform an experiment. He went out and found a frog. He then placed the frog on his floor and screamed at it "Jump, frog, jump!"
The frog jumped 8 feet. The Auburn football player wrote in his journal: "Frog with 4 legs can jump 8 feet."
He then cut off one of the frog's front legs, replaced the frog on his floor and screamed "Jump, frog, jump!"
The frog jumped again, but a bit sideways. It came to rest 6 feet from where it started. The Auburn football player wrote in his journal: "Frog with 3 legs can jump 6 feet."
He then cut off the frog's other front leg. This time when he yelled "Jump, frog, jump!", the frog skidded more than it actually jumped, but still managed to make it 4 feet from its starting point. He wrote in his journal: "Frog with 2 legs can jump 4 feet."
This time, he cut off one of the frog's back legs. He replaced it on his floor and yelled again, "Jump, frog, jump!". This time the frog managed to slide across the floor 2 feet. So he wrote in his journal: "Frog with 1 leg can jump 2 feet."
Finally, the Auburn football player cut off the frog's last leg. He sat the poor legless creature on his floor and yelled, "Jump, frog, jump!"
The poor frog twitched but did not leave its starting position.
The Auburn football player yelled again, "Jump, frog, jump!" The frog still did not move.
For the third time, the Auburn football player yelled, "Jump, frog, jump!" and this time clapped his hands to scare the frog. The frog still did not move.
So the Auburn football player wrote in his journal: "Frog with no legs cannot hear."
Originally posted by TheRedneck
When I was younger, corporal punishment was considered not only an acceptable method of discipline, but a duty of parents when needed. A parent who did not spank their child when the child misbehaved was considered a bad parent.
Is the issue as simple as one aspect contributing to the well-being or detriment of a child's welfare? No. Like everything in life there are a variety of factors that contribute to any outcome.
Does it make you happy or angry when someone hits you?
Does it make you comfortable or anxious when someone threatens you? (Bearing in mind that adrenaline is a stress hormone, please)
Originally posted by TheRedneck
I do not need to bear anything in mind.
The answer is anxious (assuming the threat is valid enough to be taken seriously; otherwise it is amusing).
Does it still make you angry that someone hits you, without actually injuring you, when the act later turns out to have the effect of stopping you from seriously injuring yourself? (This time you can bear in mind that the hitter was aware that this would be the outcome.)
Does a threat still make you anxious later, when you realize that threat was made not to actually harm you, but to prevent you from making a heinous mistake? (Again, bear in mind that the threatener knew what would occur.)
"Frog with no legs cannot hear."
Originally posted by kingoftheworld
Whatever, i believe that it is propaganda. I was spanked as a child nothing wrong with me. I mean I think that it is part of a movement for the goverment to start taking more rights away from parents.