Moranity1 and Lady Orchid,
I noticed in your posts you have both asked similar questions -
Moranity1 posted on 22-6-2004 at 03:24 AM Post Number: 613140 (post id: 633834)
'... and how do the "good" aliens expect people to accept the destruction of humanity, or most of it?'
Lady Orchid posted on 22-6-2004 at 12:12 PM Post Number: 614245 (post id: 634939)
'If this dimentional thing is going to happen, and those able to love universally are saved, are the 'good' alien faction going to erase our minds
from the horror of all these people dying? Because if you truly love everyone and everything it would break your heart to see all the destruction,
wouldn't it?'
Both are very valid points, were your perspective one that ascribed humanity with the quality of compassion. An admirable view and one that I would
suggest you both suscribe to by initially posting such a question.
In reference to these points it has beeen said that the answer given by Kangaxx is that of the 'Good' aliens don't actually care. An incredible
statement for one who has previously mentioned that he enjoys the study of psychology. Surely even the most basic of insights into that subject would
elucidate as indubitable that such a trauma - the understanding that the majority of your race has been wiped out, inevitably including some who would
have been close family - would have an overshadowing and unprecedented detrimental effect on the psyche of all who survived such a 'cleansing'.
Therefore a concern you would have thought such an advanced alien race would understand and cater for, rather than just dismiss.
To further my point I could offer to support Kangaxx agrument with the following:
It could be suggested here that the resulting psychological wounds that such an event would no doubt cause are a necessary evil. A good analogy might
be that of a soldier of old having to endure the pain of amputation on the battlefield so that infection did not set in and lead eventually to death.
I freely offer this explanation because that mine is the initial mentioning of it, any attempt to use it in justification of the point becomes
completely invalid. Any such analogy, any explanation to either of you has not been forthcoming, and I believe I can explain why this is.
As I have said, such a viewpoint - one which incidentally should be commended - would only be ascribed by one who percieves mankind as inherently
compassionate. A viewpoint that, through his own words, it can be demonstrated kangaxx does not suscribe to -
kangaxx post page 2 posted on 17-5-2004 at 07:14 AM Post Number: 534849 (post id: 555543)
'each time you have suffered,cryed,or be sad...do you have realized very well why?!? try to analyze that and you will reach a normal simple idea;
each time you suffer,its because YOU have lost something you like,you have lost something you think you need,you have suffered pain in YOUR
boddy...and so on...always you will see that YOU is the central victim...that is pure selfishness.'
Kangaxx posted on 18-5-2004 at 07:03 AM Post Number: 537080 (post id: 557774)
'5- some one says:" we are capable of love, and capable of great feats"...sure we are, that's because of that they will chose the ones capable of
that,,,but if you say this to me, and you are talking about the normal human history that all the people know just in the past 300 years...you must be
joking for sure!'
The above posts are full, complete and unaltered quotes directly from Kangaxx own hand with all the information required for you to go and find the
posts if you would like; and as published as such I CANNOT be accused here of 'twisting' anyones words. I have posted my replies to these on
www.abovetopsecret.com... should you be interested.
Note: The above- '... should you be interested.' You are not required to read them, I only suggest you do that you might get further undestanding
of the points in question. The choice is yours.
(I know that the above 'Note' obvious to the vast majority, but you never know how a helpful suggestion may be percieved by others. Some could even
interpret the offer of further points in reference to the subject as 'whining'; hence this bloated disclaimer!)
I hope this has helped clarify the questions posed by the both of you.
[Section removed due to the following posting by theRiverGoddess - and with my apologies to her]
[edit on 23-6-2004 by JAK]
[edit on 23-6-2004 by JAK]
[edit on 23-6-2004 by JAK]
