reply to post by Watcher-In-The-Shadows
I don't remembering making that claim..
It does make sense, though, I guess. Why would you add something MORE complex, to explain how complexity exists? That's like saying water is created
by more water (somewhere else).. Well where did this other water come from? It was always there, to create the other water.. Okay, how does that line
of thinking answer anything? And where is the proof that the other water is eternal? Because I say it is? What kind of argument is that?
That's the same argument theists pose, when talking about creation and the existence of God. It's useless.
I "take god out of the argument" because there's no evidence of god. Most christians claim that you "can not test for god," but that leaves me
wondering what use the concept of god is, if you can't prove whether or not it even exists.
Can you tell me if zeus is real or not? No, you can't. Yet I highly doubt you've made your animal sacrifice to zeus today. Maybe you should? It
might bring you favor to the gods.
What if you don't make an animal sacrifice? Then you are just as guilty as I am, of "deleting variables" from the equation. Zeus would be very
displeased.