It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Airplane snatched-up by UFO - caught on tape??

page: 2
5
<< 1   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 9 2009 @ 08:17 PM
link   
I think you guys look at every new video as a fake and pick it apart,even if it was real you would believe its fake and there fore deny yourself something thats genuine. Im not saying this video is real,but im not ruling out that its a fake based on some peoples 'anaylisis'.




posted on Oct, 9 2009 @ 08:44 PM
link   

Originally posted by 13arrows
I think you guys look at every new video as a fake and pick it apart,even if it was real you would believe its fake and there fore deny yourself something thats genuine. Im not saying this video is real,but im not ruling out that its a fake based on some peoples 'anaylisis'.

It would be a very good idea to READ the thread before posting:
NOT only we know that it IS CGI: we even know WHO, WHEN, WHY, WHERE, AND HOW made it thanks to member free_spirit who solved the case: it's just a matter to take the time to read the thread before posting. And regardless whathever you think about the 'analysis', well: they were right, unlike you.



posted on Oct, 9 2009 @ 08:46 PM
link   

Originally posted by internos

Originally posted by 13arrows
I think you guys look at every new video as a fake and pick it apart,even if it was real you would believe its fake and there fore deny yourself something thats genuine. Im not saying this video is real,but im not ruling out that its a fake based on some peoples 'anaylisis'.

It would be a very good idea to READ the thread before posting:
NOT only we know that it IS CGI: we even know WHO, WHEN, WHY, WHERE, AND HOW made it thanks to member free_spirit who solved the case: it's just a matter to take the time to read the thread before posting. And regardless whathever you think about the 'analysis', well: they were right, unlike you.







did this filmaker at one time have that video on his site? because after checking free_spirit's links i see no conection between him and the video in the op.



posted on Oct, 9 2009 @ 08:57 PM
link   
Seems I remember a time when the consensus was "I'll believe in UFOs when I see an actual photo of one".
Then the video camera was introduced and the consensus changed to "I'll believe in UFOs when I see an actual video".
Now cameras, video cams, cell phones and computer technologies abound and the consensus has now changed to "It's computer generated"



posted on Oct, 9 2009 @ 09:15 PM
link   
The fact that the plane isn't sheared in half should be enough of a dead giveaway that it's fake. Also, the sound, where's the sonic boom?



posted on Oct, 9 2009 @ 10:28 PM
link   
reply to post by nerbot
 


I do know what I'm taking about.
But what you see is what you get so far.
No proof for you,



posted on Oct, 10 2009 @ 01:46 AM
link   

Originally posted by TeslaandLyne
reply to post by nerbot
 


I do know what I'm taking about.


No, you just think you do.


But what you see is what you get so far.


Yeah, claims and statements with nothing to back them up.


No proof for you,


Because you have none.


Keep up the deception if it keeps you happy.



posted on Oct, 10 2009 @ 10:36 AM
link   
reply to post by nerbot
 


Good thing I didn't say much.
So proof seeker, there are no UFOs?



[edit on 10/10/2009 by TeslaandLyne]



posted on Oct, 10 2009 @ 11:01 AM
link   
reply to post by Lucidliving
 


Regardless of the reality or lack thereof , of the material we are examining here, it really hacks me off that some people insist that an alien craft involves itself with mundane physics like air displacement due to super sonic velocity.
If they can travel from star system to star system with relative ease, then you have no idea what kind of physics they are even working with , and you cannot merely ASSUME that their craft interacts with the physics you can grasp. Chances are there are millenia of advancements involved with any craft capable of crossing the interstellar gulf, which means you have no frame of reference for waving your sonic boom complaint around.



posted on Oct, 10 2009 @ 11:53 AM
link   
reply to post by TrueBrit
 


Even man made theories are getting strange because again
there is unknown territory as the physics study has been denied.
If one can interpret statement that an air ship will be stable in
wind and storm then the physics will be better understood.



posted on Oct, 10 2009 @ 06:48 PM
link   

Originally posted by TeslaandLyne
reply to post by nerbot
 


Good thing I didn't say much.
So proof seeker, there are no UFOs?


Says who?


I never said there are no UFO's. I simply said I hadn't seen one myself YET.

Feel free to change my view on that but I'm pretty sure you have nothing to offer that would convince me.



posted on Oct, 11 2009 @ 02:40 PM
link   
Well then fully witnessed craft are not UFOs perhaps,
they are just unknown craft.

The Hudson Valley wing and triangle and Belgian UFO (er triangle)
wave have enough witnesses of a slow and low flying craft to put
up enough lines together, drawings, to show a craft was moving
in the air.

The actual craft such as those are not UFOs then, just experimental
craft.

Unknown experimental craft.

This OP video is perhaps made in a video lab so who can identify the
craft anyway and might mimic such videos that are not made in
video labs and just a random video. Non random UFO video
real and fake might also be made by agents of the craft owners
and operators to help confuse people on the UFO issue.
(Just talking here, no proof required, suppositions of conspiracy.)
(The pick up on conspiracy just goes by some people like sarcasm
just can't work on the internet I've been told.)

I'd say there are experimental craft developed and thats quite
astounding.



posted on Oct, 14 2009 @ 05:28 AM
link   
reply to post by TrueBrit
 


A fair point. Then that would mean there's so, so much more to learn about physics, not to say that we were almost done or anything.

[edit on 14-10-2009 by Lucidliving]



posted on Oct, 14 2009 @ 04:55 PM
link   
Physics and electrical engineering stopped when Tesla used electricity of
high voltage static as a direct physical force.
That is why there is no more ether.
Something is pushed by the static coil and that would have to be
something that activates bar magnets to flying saucers.
Pushing ether around like sound pressure waves cause physical
effects.

Back when propeller plane engines got a turbo thrust in their engines,
the engines were done away with and just the gases were use as jets.
At the same time the thrust from electrical voltage became used as
an effective motive force.

No physics that we know of, studied the effect, only Tesla.
Thats the reason we hear from the Tesla bashers.
Also UFO bashers.
Also ET supporters and anything else that cannot support
the methods of Tesla which has been purposely hidden from use.
Only Maxwell and Hertz are studied by design by the industrial
cartels and educational supporters.



new topics

top topics



 
5
<< 1   >>

log in

join