It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Quote from : Wikipedia : Militia (United States)
From Old English milite meaning soldiers (plural), militisc meaning military and also classical Latin milit-, miles meaning soldier.
The Modern English term militia dates to the year 1590, with the original meaning now obsolete: "the body of soldiers in the service of a sovereign or a state".
Subsequently, since approximately 1665, militia has taken the meaning "a military force raised from the civilian population of a country or region, especially to supplement a regular army in an emergency,frequently as distinguished from mercenaries or professional soldiers."
The distinction is due to the fact that militia members are not paid soldiers, but serve as volunteers on an ad hoc basis to protect the freedom of their home and country.
The militia of the United States consists of all able-bodied males at least 17 years of age and, except as provided in section 313 of title 32, under 45 years of age who are, or who have made a declaration of intention to become, citizens of the United States and of female citizens of the United States who are members of the National Guard.
(b) The classes of the militia are—
(1) the organized militia, which consists of the National Guard and the Naval Militia; and
(2) the unorganized militia, which consists of the members of the militia who are not members of the National Guard or the Naval Militia.
Originally posted by OutKast Searcher
reply to post by brainwrek
Private militia's do not fall under the "unorganized militia" definition. In that clause the "unorganized militia" is all men between 17 and 45...basically those eligible for the draft.
The militia's that the OP is talking about are not Constitutionally protected...they are "private militias" and have no legality behind them.
The "official" militia of the United States is the National Guard...this is the "well regulated" militia of the states. THere are also some state defense forces...but those are also "well regulated". A bunch of yahoos running around in the woods is not "well regulated"...who are they "regulated" by??? They would need to be regulated by the state congress to be defined as a defense force...which they are not.
Having said that...I don't think you will be arressted for being in a private militia...unless of course you are planning to overthrow the government or planning other such illegal activities.
Originally posted by rufusdrak
1. are militias constitutionally legal?
2. are militias viewed as terrorist organizations by our government?
3. is it legal/illegal (or viewed as a terrorist activity) to train with a local/state militia in the interest of honing a civil defense force to curtail "both foreign and domestic" indiscretion (i.e. our own government).
4. if the IDEA of militias are legal, does it cross over into illegal/terroristic territory if said militia explicitly declares in their mission statement that their stated goal is to defend america and american rights against the runaway government/u.s. military?
Originally posted by rufusdrak
1. are militias constitutionally legal?
2. are militias viewed as terrorist organizations by our government?
3. is it legal/illegal (or viewed as a terrorist activity) to train with a local/state militia in the interest of honing a civil defense force to curtail "both foreign and domestic" indiscretion (i.e. our own government).
4. if the IDEA of militias are legal, does it cross over into illegal/terroristic territory if said militia explicitly declares in their mission statement that their stated goal is to defend america and american rights against the runaway government/u.s. military?