It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Do Progressive Liberals Hate Children?

page: 1
0
<<   2 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 29 2009 @ 03:14 PM
link   
I am starting to wonder if Progressive Liberals hate children, or at the very least do not value them. You may ask why I am wondering this, well here is why:

1. They are pro-baby murder.

2. They try to brainwash the children in public schools with their unhealthy belief system, and to teach them to worship their liberal leaders.

3. They want to pile more and more debt on our children and grandchildren.

4. They want to free a known child molestor, Roman Polanski, so he can continue to be free to rape more poor innocent children.

How can you say you care about the children of this country, when you think it is ok to kill them before they are born, or to brainwash them in school, or to ruin their lives with massive debt/taxes, or to set their molestors free. This is disgusting and it needs to stop. We need to protect our children from these people.




posted on Sep, 29 2009 @ 03:18 PM
link   
Broad sweeping generalizations all around.

Just as disgusting as racism, sexism, and the like.



posted on Sep, 29 2009 @ 03:19 PM
link   
reply to post by HotDogNoBun
 


Are you alright?

Let me guess, been reading fluffy blogs haven't you?

The progressive liberals I know actually eat children, but they are masons, soooo you know.


As far as your little list, I'm just gonna let it sit there for a while and giggle.



posted on Sep, 29 2009 @ 03:23 PM
link   
reply to post by schrodingers dog
 


Well what part of my little list is not true. Progressives ARE pro-baby murder, ARE indoctrinating chidren in public schools, ARE for the release of Roman Polanski, and will run up the debt to get whatever they want because they dont know or care how their agenda wil be paid for. So where am I wrong?



posted on Sep, 29 2009 @ 03:27 PM
link   
Well, I guess you got us child hating liberals now! Can't fool you!
Maybe tone down the hysteria, think really hard and you can come up with something that will get you the flags and stars you obviously desperately desire. Your post is ridiculous! When did you stop beating your wife?



posted on Sep, 29 2009 @ 03:32 PM
link   
reply to post by OldDragger
 


Why would I beat my wife? I am for the good things in this world. You know things like a childs right to life, putting child molestors in prison where they belong, lower taxes, less government interference in peoples lives, and teaching our chidren the MANY virtues of America and the beauty of a well managed capitaist society. You remember, the things that made this country the most powerful nation on earth.



posted on Sep, 29 2009 @ 03:34 PM
link   

Originally posted by HotDogNoBun
reply to post by schrodingers dog
 


Well what part of my little list is not true. Progressives ARE pro-baby murder, ARE indoctrinating chidren in public schools, ARE for the release of Roman Polanski, and will run up the debt to get whatever they want because they dont know or care how their agenda wil be paid for. So where am I wrong?


Oh man, do I really have to do this ...


1. They are pro-baby murder.


No they are not ... but even if you consider abortion baby murder it is not a singularly "progressive liberal" position: Pro-Choice Republicans Stake Claim to Their Party


2. They try to brainwash the children in public schools with their unhealthy belief system, and to teach them to worship their liberal leaders.


Schools brainwash and indoctrinate children, that is what they do. Of course you can always homeschool you children and do it yourself. I would ask you for our sake to no do that.



3. They want to pile more and more debt on our children and grandchildren.


Again, not a singularly progressive liberal stance. History is our friend, especially when it just happened.



4. They want to free a known child molestor, Roman Polanski, so he can continue to be free to rape more poor innocent children.


Not even worth dignifying that with a response.

Personally I can't stand any political ideology, they are prisons of the mind. What you are doing however is even worse than that.



posted on Sep, 29 2009 @ 03:34 PM
link   
OK, the Kernel will play.


Originally posted by HotDogNoBun
1. They are pro-baby murder.


They actually go into peoples houses and kill babies? Oh, you mean abortion. That's been before the SC and the law doesn't substantiate your claim. For the record the Kernel doesn't support abortion but it's not my call.


2. They try to brainwash the children in public schools with their unhealthy belief system, and to teach them to worship their liberal leaders.


The Obama school talk? So getting kids interested in staying in school is a "liberal" thing? The Kernel may have to rethink his political position. The Obama school song? Did he ask or endorse that?


3. They want to pile more and more debt on our children and grandchildren.


The Kernel believes that the outrageous outflux of money started with the previous administration. You remember the War on Terror, right?


4. They want to free a known child molestor, Roman Polanski, so he can continue to be free to rape more poor innocent children.


He better have Extra Strength Viagra and a Energizer battery for his wheelchair.


We need to protect our children from these people.


No. We need to protect our children and grandchildren from peoiple that make braod generalization without thought or conscience. Lest they become as ignorant.



posted on Sep, 29 2009 @ 03:38 PM
link   
Everybody hates children. Noisy, messy, and talk about needy. Your "fiery rhetoric" is obviously an invitation to a fight. No useful debate can come from it. Your mind is obviously made up.



posted on Sep, 29 2009 @ 03:48 PM
link   
reply to post by Kernel Korn
 


No they dont go into houses and murder babies, nor did most German people throw a Jew into a gas chamber, but if you dont stand up and protect those innocents who are being murdered and declare that you are against it, and even worse, if you support it then you are guilty of condoning it.

Sure we ran up debt fighting wars. Maybe we should start setting aside a savings account for everytime somebody decides to attack our nation and KILL OUT PEOPLE. Shoud we have avoided WW2 because we couldnt afford it? I guess we should have just told the terrorists feel free to keep kiling us, until we can save up the cash to come and kick your asses.

So if someone raped your kid you would be ok with it as long as the guy was old and cripped and needed Viagra?



posted on Sep, 29 2009 @ 03:50 PM
link   
reply to post by concernedcitizan
 


I love how you have no case to defend Progressives so you just attack the messenger.



posted on Sep, 29 2009 @ 03:51 PM
link   
Ahhh yes, nothing like trying to pinch entire groups into one class.....

with people like you out there spreading this kind of drivel, who needs COINTEL PRO?



posted on Sep, 29 2009 @ 03:53 PM
link   
I have to say though, this is a fairly nice attempt to mask trolling....obviously the agenda here is as an anti-choicer.

He just disguised it as a thread about liberals.



posted on Sep, 29 2009 @ 03:54 PM
link   
reply to post by captaintyinknots
 


Well please point out where I am wrong then. I havent lumped them into one group. They have lumped themselves together with their common beliefs and given themselves the name of Progressives. Is that my fault?



posted on Sep, 29 2009 @ 03:54 PM
link   

Originally posted by Kernel Korn
The Obama school talk? So getting kids interested in staying in school is a "liberal" thing? The Kernel may have to rethink his political position. The Obama school song? Did he ask or endorse that?


Oh, no, Mr. /Ms. Korn, I believe Mr. /Ms. Hot Dog was talking about how they want to indoctrinate our children by teaching them creationism in schools. Maybe... I could be wrong.

I'm hungry.

[edit on 29-9-2009 by Benevolent Heretic]



posted on Sep, 29 2009 @ 03:57 PM
link   
reply to post by captaintyinknots
 


That is just beautiful. I am anti choice because I am anti baby murder, but you are for choice. Well I am for the choice of the child to live. When they get 18 and want to kill themselves then I will support that choice as well.



posted on Sep, 29 2009 @ 03:58 PM
link   

Originally posted by HotDogNoBun
reply to post by captaintyinknots
 


Well please point out where I am wrong then. I havent lumped them into one group. They have lumped themselves together with their common beliefs and given themselves the name of Progressives. Is that my fault?


I'm not into feeding trolls, so dont expect a lot of discourse after this.

1)No liberals murder babies. Many are pro-choice.Many are anti-choice. If you dont know the difference, I cant help you. Either way, you are generalizing an entire group, falsly.

2)I work in a middle school. The majority of subject matter is VERY conservative. Nice try.

3)You really think only liberals are supporting Polanski? Again, pinching everyone together.

4)Bush(a conservative) created more debt than any president in history.

The only people the children need protection from are closed-minded non-thinkers who dont understand the concept of INDIVIDUALS.



posted on Sep, 29 2009 @ 03:59 PM
link   
reply to post by Benevolent Heretic
 


LMAO, people who believe in creationism are dumbasses. 6000 year old earth.
This isnt about religion, its about common sense and doing the right things for children.



posted on Sep, 29 2009 @ 04:03 PM
link   
reply to post by HotDogNoBun
 


Where was I defending progressives?



posted on Sep, 29 2009 @ 04:23 PM
link   
reply to post by concernedcitizan
 


Well I apologize if you were not defending them. I dont know how anyone could defend that sort of ideology.



new topics

top topics



 
0
<<   2 >>

log in

join