UFO in Spain, page 38
Pages: <<  35    36    37    38  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 95 times


reply posted on 6-10-2009 @ 03:58 PM by ArMaP
reply to post by zaiger


Then I guess I misinterpreted what you meant with your post.



reply posted on 6-10-2009 @ 04:03 PM by ArMaP
reply to post by DaWhiz


I am paying attention and I know that there are no trees in the Atlantic ocean, at least in that condition, but I know that it's easy (for those that know how to use the right tools) to take the jets from a scene like that and add them to another, so there is no need to "scramble" any jets.

PS: there is no need to quote the entire post, you should delete the part that does not directly apply and leave only the part that you are replying to, the thread is easier to read that way.


reply posted on 6-10-2009 @ 04:06 PM by DaWhiz
reply to post by DaWhiz



Again, view the original, so called 'FAKE' footage.

width="445" height="364"> "http://www.youtube.com/v/v2wauxK8RKA&hl=en&fs=1&color1=0x5d1719&color2=0xcd311b&border=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="445" height="364">

Please show me trees!


reply posted on 6-10-2009 @ 04:14 PM by ArMaP
reply to post by DaWhiz



I see I was not clear enough (again).

There are no trees on the original video because they were probably removed from that scene from which I posted an image.

In the same way they can add a fake UFO and (probably) a fake splash, they can add a real scene from somewhere else (in this case the two jets) in any way they want, with the two jets closer or farther away, higher or lower, etc.



reply posted on 6-10-2009 @ 04:15 PM by DaWhiz
Originally posted by ArMaP
reply to
post by DaWhiz


I am paying attention and I know that there are no trees in the Atlantic ocean, at least in that condition, but I know that it's easy (for those that know how to use the right tools) to take the jets from a scene like that and add them to another, so there is no need to "scramble" any jets.

PS: there is no need to quote the entire post, you should delete the part that does not directly apply and leave only the part that you are replying to, the thread is easier to read that way.


But look at the footage of those jets and please try to fit them frame by frame into the tiny, not so well pix elated jets in the original 'fake' one.' There is only so much CGI is gonna do for you.
Oh and sorry, I was trying to re-post the thread video & I don't want to ruin peoples post. My apologies.


reply posted on 6-10-2009 @ 04:27 PM by InTrueFiction
Originally posted by ArMaP
reply to
post by DaWhiz


... and (probably) a fake splash


The "splash" is obviously fake as has been mentioned and proven by several posters already.

This video has clear amateur editing scars, clear amateur errors of water animation, clear errors in sound editing. Even more - it has been admitted as a hoax and even the making of has been made public!

What else do you need to realise that this is a hoax?

Blind belief leads nowhere.


reply posted on 7-10-2009 @ 12:31 PM by GezinhoKiko
reply to post by ArMaP



So there we have it, another fake that had most of us up in arms (including me) saying this is real! well thats the last time im going to believe any footage until proven otherwise. I know it seems the disinfo agents are working, but im just sick an tired of being dragged along by fakers.


Great work ArMap and congrats on becoming moderator.


reply posted on 7-10-2009 @ 02:30 PM by GezinhoKiko
reply to post by DelMarvel



the disinfo agents being the motherfu**ers that made it! get me now?
2nd line


reply posted on 8-10-2009 @ 09:18 AM by Soylent Green Is People
Originally posted by GezinhoKiko
So there we have it, another fake that had most of us up in arms (including me) saying this is real! well thats the last time im going to believe any footage until proven otherwise. I know it seems the disinfo agents are working, but im just sick an tired of being dragged along by fakers.


I'm not trying to be a jerk here, but what specifically about that video convinced you it was real?

I'm not saying you should have known it was a fake, either. There is a third alternative to "I'm convinced it's real" and "I'm convinced it's fake" -- and that alternative is "I don't know if it is real or if it is fake".

I just don't understand why you would be "up in arms" convinced that this video was real. I saw nothing in the video that would prove to me it was real, Granted, I also originally saw nothing that would prove it was fake, either -- that is, until I read the ATS member posts debunking it. Although I, too, thought some things looked "wrong" (such as the splash).

Videos such as this should not be originally considered "real until proven fake" or even "fake until proven real" -- their authenticity should be simply "unknown until evidence shows it to be either real or fake".

This is where the job of the good skeptic is shown to be crucial. They want to view all of the evidence and possible explanations before coming to a conclusion about a UFO report's authenticity.


[edit on 10/8/2009 by Soylent Green Is People]



reply posted on 24-10-2009 @ 07:02 PM by InTrueFiction
reply to post by SolPower



Better yet... why are you bumping a thread no one has posted on for 16 days - especially if just to claim it is fake when it has already been moved to the HOAX! forum long ago?
Pages: <<  35    36    37    38  >>    ^^TOP^^



UFO in Riga, Latvia?
  Posted 17 days ago with 9 member flags
Empty Plane Theory
  Posted 11 days ago with 9 member flags
Obama\'s College Classmate Speaks Out!!!!
  Posted 10 days ago with 4 member flags
Machu Picchu: Hidden face?
  Posted 15 days ago with 2 member flags
Possible alien at Russian Machine plant ?
  Posted 12 days ago with 2 member flags
Massive US Troop Movements In California Raise Russian Concerns
  Posted 13 days ago with 1 member flags
Ghost in kitchen - [HOAX]
  Posted 9 days ago with 1 member flags
KISSFM Records Strange Noise
  Posted 10 days ago with 1 member flags