It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

UFO in Spain

page: 33
95
<< 30  31  32    34  35  36 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 3 2009 @ 06:26 PM
link   
reply to post by ALLis0NE
 


You should throw a large flat and round rock into the water, you will notice a large kind of "cone" that shoots up along with the spray, that is exactly what I see in the picture.




posted on Oct, 3 2009 @ 06:31 PM
link   
reply to post by Erich Kemper
 


Erich, looks like more ufo activity in Spain January 2009.
Google sure makes it easy.

Triangle UFO - Spain

It looks like the Triangle UFO spotted over Belgium around 1989.
P.S. This is what CG looks like.



posted on Oct, 3 2009 @ 06:37 PM
link   
reply to post by Erich Kemper
 


Please explain to me how this big plop has no effect or consequence on the surrounding waters.



[edit on 3-10-2009 by InTrueFiction]



posted on Oct, 3 2009 @ 06:38 PM
link   
I used a 'real splash' which indeed doesn't look like the CGI version of the OP video. You can add "keyed" stock footage layers to your video composition. This also goes for flames, smoke, muzzle flashes etc.

The UFO btw is only an animated 2d image.




PS: Another hint - just watch the shadow below the UFO closely



posted on Oct, 3 2009 @ 06:40 PM
link   
Check the slo-mo HD video at 0:39, and the craft's sun shadow is in completely the wrong place and way too large - the sun is somewhere behind the fishermen, not right above as the craft's shadow would dictate.

"I want to believe" - maybe next year will be the one...




posted on Oct, 3 2009 @ 06:41 PM
link   
reply to post by InTrueFiction
 



This is what I mean.



posted on Oct, 3 2009 @ 06:45 PM
link   
reply to post by Erich Kemper
 


Looks good to me.
I'm convinced the UFO is really diving into the ocean.
That fishing boat might be CG though.
Let me take another look.
P.S. Check your U2U.



posted on Oct, 3 2009 @ 06:46 PM
link   
reply to post by Erich Kemper
 


I don't know if you are being sarcastic or serious at this point
so I will just take a chance and bite:

- In your very own video a single drop of water creates a distortion much larger than its dimension in the liquid surface it falls into. Please explain to me why in this video the huge "cone" (which in itself is questionable) does not create any distortion, effect or consequence in the surrounding waters.



posted on Oct, 3 2009 @ 06:49 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Oct, 3 2009 @ 06:50 PM
link   
reply to post by GoldenChild
 


How about this GoldenChild?
The warp field produced by the scout class spacecraft
pushes the water out of the way and
causes a small hole in the ocean just before entering.
The water creates the shadow you are looking at.
Does that make sense to you?



posted on Oct, 3 2009 @ 06:52 PM
link   
reply to post by Eurisko2012
 


I really hope you are being sarcastic.



posted on Oct, 3 2009 @ 06:54 PM
link   
reply to post by Eurisko2012
 


In all honesty, no it doesn't - where's the displaced water that's creating the shadow, it's nowhere to be seen..? And with the water displaced, why the splash effect? And wouldn't the warp effect have buggered up the jet's electronics?

I have a suspicion you make be messing with my mind after a beer or two, what are you like?



posted on Oct, 3 2009 @ 07:05 PM
link   
reply to post by GoldenChild
 


If they wanted to shut down the jet electrical power, they could.
They didn't want to. Todays mission was : Air Show
It was a good one.
Technically, it is a gravity wave dampening field that kills the
power generation.



posted on Oct, 3 2009 @ 07:34 PM
link   
Yeah! This UFO is real! They look so real to me! As real as the UFO in my avatar picture! People think that is CGI too but I always say it isn't.

Even if all these UFOs were CGI I would still say they look real just because I can and nobody can stop me. Even if they proved it was all fake I would still say it isn't.

I don't care about the truth, I just like anything that has to do with UFO's even if innocent people are getting humiliated and lied to.



posted on Oct, 3 2009 @ 07:38 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Oct, 3 2009 @ 07:42 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Oct, 3 2009 @ 07:43 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Oct, 3 2009 @ 07:45 PM
link   
For those who haven't noticed, here's a link to a hq copy a guy from a youtube video posted in his comments.

resumen2012.com...

Oh and to that guy who did the stabilized video, did you do that by hand or is there software that let's you rotate and reposition each frame?



posted on Oct, 3 2009 @ 07:56 PM
link   
omg beleive i wish so much this is real...one thing though that makes me re-think is that the guy asks his shipmate 2 times..What is that? what is that?...when for me its obvious its aUFO so i might just say..>WTF A UFO ... A UFO!!!...or Look theres a UFO.>A UFOOOO

also at that speed wouldnt the jet speed be bit after they passed?

i think nowadays..video footage is like crop circles...unusable for disclosure


[edit on 3-10-2009 by heineken]

[edit on 3-10-2009 by heineken]



posted on Oct, 3 2009 @ 08:31 PM
link   
When the camera films the helicopter initially approaching the boat, there is absolutely no disturbance to the water below. Since the helicopter is flying rather low, moving slowly and in close proximity to the vessel, one would expect to see some sort of disturbance to the water below from the rotors.

The camera then pans down to the ground and after a few seconds pans back up to the helicopter. At this point, the disturbance in the water miraculously appears, even though the helicopter appears to be at roughly the same height and location as the previous shot. The chopper may be a bit closer and a bit lower than it is in the initial shot, but this should not make much of a difference.

Since the chopper is basically at the same location during both shots, either there should be a disturbance or should not be a disturbance to the water in both scenes. You can't have it both ways, unless of course there is some video manipulation going on here.

As for the splash, it looks like a serious paste job superimposing one layer over another. Even seconds after the splash, the camerman pans over to his fisherman buddy's face. Why would he do this and not attempt to zoom into the location where the splash occurred. In fact, during the entire scene, he does not bother to zoom in even once.

If you saw a UFO hovering over the water, why wouldn't you try and zoom in to it for more detail? Because zooming in would give the viewer a little too much fake detail. Nice try, but no cigar here.



new topics

top topics



 
95
<< 30  31  32    34  35  36 >>

log in

join