It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

UFO in Spain

page: 32
95
<< 29  30  31    33  34  35 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 3 2009 @ 05:32 PM
link   

Originally posted by Eurisko2012

Originally posted by Erich Kemper
reply to post by InTrueFiction
 


Can you produce a similar piece of footage?


Of course he can't.
He is all talk.
This video should be moved into the Top 10 List of UFOs.
I heard Destination Truth is making UFO investigations now.
UFO Hunters was canceled. Josh Gates needs to go to Spain
and check this out. More Spain UFO videos are popping up
on Youtube right now. It's the new Hot Spot.


It is all fine by me really that you believe this video - I'm just saying as someone that works on CGI that I'm looking at that video still by still and to my eyes it is obviously fake. But you are right I am just lil ol' me. I'm not a CGI expert I just work in the field. So move that video to the top 10 of ufology if you wish - my fear is ufology only loses credibility for accepting this video as proof.

Take care




posted on Oct, 3 2009 @ 05:33 PM
link   
reply to post by InTrueFiction
 


So you can't? You could do a low budget, I just want to see a UFO plunge in the water with an hand-held camera in the same quality as the HQ version of the "viral". It shouldn't be too difficult for you. You would do everyone on ATS a favour!



posted on Oct, 3 2009 @ 05:35 PM
link   
reply to post by InTrueFiction
 


You could work at Burger King.
How do we know?

There are CG fake UFO videos on Youtube also.
There is a clear difference.



posted on Oct, 3 2009 @ 05:36 PM
link   

Originally posted by Erich Kemper
reply to post by InTrueFiction
 


So you can't? You could do a low budget, I just want to see a UFO plunge in the water with an hand-held camera in the same quality as the HQ version of the "viral". It shouldn't be too difficult for you. You would do everyone on ATS a favour!

If you even looked closely at the "plunge" with a clear mind you would know it is a fake video. Really. Just examine the so called "plunge" - it is very bad CGI.



posted on Oct, 3 2009 @ 05:42 PM
link   

Originally posted by Eurisko2012
Of course he can't.
He is all talk.


From the looks of it, you are all talk.

All you do is deny without even showing reasons why you deny.



Originally posted by Eurisko2012
This video should be moved into the Top 10 List of UFOs.


Actually it should be moved to the Top 10 worst composite CGI videos ever.

Even an amature can do better...

Good example:



posted on Oct, 3 2009 @ 05:43 PM
link   

Originally posted by Eurisko2012
reply to post by InTrueFiction
 


You could work at Burger King.
How do we know?

There are CG fake UFO videos on Youtube also.
There is a clear difference.


I could work at Burger King yes or maybe I'm a disinfo agent from NASA


Don't get me wrong I am not trying to convince you that you should trust me and follow my opinion - I'm just adding information to the forum based on my experience and what I know. If you do not accept it that is fine.
Just adding information. Take that as the smoking gun if you wish my friend. Personally I will wait for the next one because to me that video is obviously fake.

P.S. - I'd still think that was fake if I did work for Burger King


[edit on 3-10-2009 by InTrueFiction]



posted on Oct, 3 2009 @ 05:47 PM
link   
reply to post by Erich Kemper
 


Alert: NEW video
Here you go: Slow Mo HD!
Very clear.
New Video:Slow Mo

It looks like the ball splits into 3 separate UFOs and fly off!


[edit on 3-10-2009 by Eurisko2012]



posted on Oct, 3 2009 @ 05:48 PM
link   
The topic is the Spanish video, folks, not each other please.



posted on Oct, 3 2009 @ 05:48 PM
link   

Originally posted by Erich Kemper
You mean like mine? Just common sense and a sharp eye is enough. I've spotted enough details that convince me that it's CGI or a hoax.



Hehehe, CGI or a Hoax? If it's CGI it is a hoax, and if it's a hoax it's probably CGI or did they use nylon strings?


CGI is a computer-based process. A hoax is perpetration. ATS members label it a hoax but it may not have been originated with that intent.

 


Trimmed quadruple-nested quote

Please read Warnings for excessive quoting, and how to quote

[edit on 3/10/09 by masqua]



posted on Oct, 3 2009 @ 05:54 PM
link   

Originally posted by InTrueFiction

Originally posted by Erich Kemper
reply to post by InTrueFiction
 


So you can't? You could do a low budget, I just want to see a UFO plunge in the water with an hand-held camera in the same quality as the HQ version of the "viral". It shouldn't be too difficult for you. You would do everyone on ATS a favour!

If you even looked closely at the "plunge" with a clear mind you would know it is a fake video. Really. Just examine the so called "plunge" - it is very bad CGI.


I also said it was, in detail.



posted on Oct, 3 2009 @ 05:58 PM
link   
reply to post by InTrueFiction
 



If you even looked closely at the "plunge" with a clear mind you would know it is a fake video. Really. Just examine the so called "plunge" - it is very bad CGI.


I did and it looks genuine, a nice detail is that the camera pans away, pans back and you can still see the disturbed water.



posted on Oct, 3 2009 @ 05:59 PM
link   

Originally posted by Eurisko2012
reply to post by Erich Kemper
 


Alert: NEW video
Here you go: Slow Mo HD!
Very clear.
New Video:Slow Mo

It looks like the ball splits into 3 separate UFOs and fly off!


[edit on 3-10-2009 by Eurisko2012]


Without discussing the "three balls", the object is seen plunging but the pushed-up water is not where the object allegedly "entered" the water! The CGI conclusion looks better with each video clarification!



posted on Oct, 3 2009 @ 06:00 PM
link   

Originally posted by Erich Kemper
reply to post by InTrueFiction
 



If you even looked closely at the "plunge" with a clear mind you would know it is a fake video. Really. Just examine the so called "plunge" - it is very bad CGI.


I did and it looks genuine, a nice detail is that the camera pans away, pans back and you can still see the disturbed water.


If this looks genuine to you it is all good
I'll just shut up:




posted on Oct, 3 2009 @ 06:03 PM
link   
We can compare the water being thrown with know occasions when a large object enters the water, like a whale.



Does it look the same or even similar?



posted on Oct, 3 2009 @ 06:07 PM
link   
you can talk yourself in to believing its real because you want it to be real.
i know I want it to be real.
but just because we want he genuine article and what we're shown looks like what we hope the real thing would, doesn't mean its the thing we've been waiting for.

people who believe the truth and know the truth know its just a matter of time before we get what we're looking for. in the meantime, stuff like this can be an amusing distraction - but still a distraction.

believing in clear fakes - even if done well - is exactly what they would have us do. a lack of patience is a clear sign of desperation. and desperation is counterproductive when the truth is on your side



posted on Oct, 3 2009 @ 06:09 PM
link   

Originally posted by InTrueFiction


Yes, that looks totally fake.

There should be ZERO "blue" color in the splash, and it should all be totally white because all the little drops of water would be reflecting the light independently, each with their own highlight.

Whoever made the video has no knowledge of fluid mechanics.



posted on Oct, 3 2009 @ 06:11 PM
link   
Exactly. It is not even good CGI. But hey - just my opinion.


 


Qoute of entire post directly above removed

Please read Warnings for excessive quoting, and how to quote

[edit on 3/10/09 by masqua]



posted on Oct, 3 2009 @ 06:14 PM
link   
reply to post by Erich Kemper
 


Right now i'm thinking that the UFO dropped 3 small
remote controlled probes. Think Star Trek TNG.
On auto pilot they all 3 take off in different directions.
Then the UFO dives into the ocean.
Great air show! Well done.
I hope we see another one soon.



posted on Oct, 3 2009 @ 06:25 PM
link   
reply to post by Eurisko2012
 


AH by the way Star Trek was CGI too.
(just friendly humour don't hurt me
)



posted on Oct, 3 2009 @ 06:26 PM
link   

Originally posted by ALLis0NEYes, that looks totally fake.

There should be ZERO "blue" color in the splash, and it should all be totally white because all the little drops of water would be reflecting the light independently, each with their own highlight.

Whoever made the video has no knowledge of fluid mechanics.



Add me to that. The spash looks fake.


I would love to be proven wrong, honestly. I will gladly admit it, but this is fake.

[edit on 3-10-2009 by talisman]

 


Double nested quote removed

please read Warnings for excessive quoting, and how to quote

[edit on 3/10/09 by masqua]



new topics

top topics



 
95
<< 29  30  31    33  34  35 >>

log in

join