It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The only problem I have with that is that you are acting as if you are sure that this was edited for transmission, while you have no way of knowing it, so your basing your explanation in a possibility.
Originally posted by FireMoon
The problem i have is simple. It is with people making pronouncements on the audio track without recourse to any understanding of what actually goes into an audio track, as a matter of course, when it is being edited for transmission.
Originally posted by ArMaP
reply to post by Skeptical Ed
This is my slow-motion version of the video that was first posted on the Terra site.
snipped
This is the clearer (higher quality) version, that was posted on the previous page (or the page before that, if this post goes into a new page ).
snipped
Thanks for that, it's appreciated. The slow motion version seems to have lost details I saw in the OP.
But the higher-res version revealed details that makes me say CGI. First, the object has a white outline which is seen in the OP. But now, when the object seems to "drop" something, the something does not hit the water although something is seen shooting off to the right but, to me, it doesn't seem to be whatever the object "dropped" because whatever flies to the right is large.) When the object is assumed to drop into the water (I couldn't see it taking off as some have claimed) the resultant plume of water looks phoney (superimposed) and it is on the horizon instead of below it as the object is shown as it drops.
It is the high-res version that needs the slo-mo treatment.
How many jets are in this video?
Does anyone agree?
[edit on 2-10-2009 by Skeptical Ed]
Originally posted by ArMaP
Here is a slow-motion version of the higher resolution video.
Unfortunately, as it as to be re-encoded it looses quality. Also, as the video is supposed to run at 30 frames per second, the compression does not work as well when we see it at 6 frames per second (the frame rate of this slow-motion version)
I will try a stabilised version, but only tomorrow, it's already 02:00 AM here in Portugal.
Smiles even wider) OK im almost expecting some government agents from some unnamed agency to drive a truckload of money up to these fishermen if they come out and say its a hoax. This is just too damm good.
Originally posted by Eurisko2012
reply to post by bluemooone2
Bluemoone2, go to Best Buy if you have to.
Plug your laptop into a Samsung LED TV.
It is so clear!
Everyone in the store will be watching with you.
Originally posted by ArMaP
Here is a slow-motion version of the higher resolution video.
Unfortunately, as it as to be re-encoded it looses quality. Also, as the video is supposed to run at 30 frames per second, the compression does not work as well when we see it at 6 frames per second (the frame rate of this slow-motion version)
I will try a stabilised version, but only tomorrow, it's already 02:00 AM here in Portugal.