I'm not in shock, lots of people dont agree with me. And you have each consistently had ONE star each, for many pages back. It looks like an
obvious tag team effort to me. And in your U2U you said you dont agree with alot of the disgusting things PT has stated and made that clear on the
board, i haven't seen those posts, im sure you remember where they are, can you please direct me and prove me wrong?
What disgusting things would those be friend? Whose version of disgusting would it be?
I assume here on ATS that all posters are mature and open minded adults capable of having a debate on all the aspects of an issue?
Justice has been served in this case per the Victim. If justice is not designed to serve the victim then it is not justice and exists solely for
When people can't respect the rights of the victim some would argue that in itself is disgusting.
Much of what you and others have advocated far exceeds the scope of the law and existing lawful remedies and some people would find that also
Most civilized nations find the death penalty disgusting and you have been advocating it all day for the crime of rape, even though not all rapes are
rape but slanderous actions by the purported victim.
DNA evidence has found many a rapist innocent who lanquished behind bars for decades, thankfully new technologies at least exonorate them and free
them where as what you advocate at best they could be exumed from a prison cemetary and burried in a private one.
This is a disgusting notion to me, but I don't carry that foolhardy and primitive notion to equating you with the same as all people should have
empathy and compassion for people regardles of the other person's lack of it.
How you and I define disgusting are definately two different things, but the minute you fail to respect free speech and people with differing
oppinions it goes from being any other adjective to un-American and un-Constitutional.
My point all afternoon long is not trampling on anyone's rights victim or perpetrator and applying justice wisely and effectively for the sake of
both the victime and the perpetrator.
Ultimately the purpose of a penal system at least our penal system is to rehabilitate anyone where ever it is possible and it does not represent a
danger to society.
32 years have passed in Polanski's case with no further crimes that he has been known to commit.
Society is not served, the victime is not served, he is not served by seeking to punish him further.
Your arguments all day long have pretty much how can justice serve your own desire for extracting the ultimate price from people by denying them their
very lives on something you will never be able to know for certain, and hundreds of overturned rape cases on DNA evidence prove it is not a crime
anyone can ever know for certain as ultimately it boils down to people who might not have been there, and someone who was painting themselves as a
victim for other reasons than an actual crime occuring.
These are all reasonable and just arguments and I imagine most reasonable and just people will find nothing 'disgusting' about them at all.