It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Tracy Lords did in fact begin performing in porno movies at 15 with a fake ID because she wanted to.
Originally posted by kosmicjack
It's totally sick.
But rather than view it as a liberal issue, I tend to view it as an elitist issue - particularly Hollywood elite.
From R. Kelly to Charlie Sheen, they seem to have their proclivities and, because they are isolated in their own little community, they entertain us and they consider themselves special, they want us to look the other way.
The deeper issue to me is the culture of abuse, ritual or otherwise. It seems pervasive in that lifestyle. McKenzie Phillips comes to mind. There are others.
The occult overtones are off the chart as well. He was married to Sharon Tate the most famous victim of the Manson murders and he directed the uber freaky Rosemary's Baby.
I agree. The Hollywood 'Elite' fully expect to lecture the rest of us on one standard and follow another. They can give a 'Go Green' speech and drive around in their SUVs and sports cars that gulp gas like a jet. Or speaking of jets, have a few parked in their back yard like John Travolta.
I think Barbera Streisand really pushed it with her lawsuit attempt to ban images of the coastline that included her house. Here is the web page with details - www.californiacoastline.org...
I am glad she lost.
[edit on 29/9/2009 by kosmicjack]
Originally posted by Stormdancer777
reply to post by ProtoplasmicTraveler
Tracy Lords did in fact begin performing in porno movies at 15 with a fake ID because she wanted to.
Yet that doesn't change anything,
I have to wonder what happened in her childhood.
There is no such thing as a consenting thirteen year old.
Originally posted by Aeons
Only, being convicted by a court of law and then fleeing isn't being beaten on the street without any trial.
Originally posted by Lillydale
Hmmmmm, good point. There are no football players on that list either, what does that tell you? Hollywood is going to defend the man. Hollywood also happens to be vastly more left than the rest of the country. I went over this already. Like I said, when it was Mark Foley only politicians stuck up for him. They also happened to all be Republican but lets not split hairs. Hollywood supports this man. Hollywood is made up of lefties. There are lefties all over the country. Only Hollywood is defending him, not the left.
Originally posted by ProtoplasmicTraveler
You are being trained, yes trained to dispense and advocate blind justice utilizing cases that most appeal to your emotions.
Originally posted by pavil
Kinda circular logic there, prove to me that conservative Hollywood types are supporting Polanski, then your argument might have merit. As it stands, only the liberal/left side of Hollywood, and granted not ALL of the liberal/left is supporting him. A more accurate statement on your part would be "Only the Hollywood Left is defending him".
Originally posted by 27jd
Originally posted by pavil
I hope you don't have a daughter, I fear you will blame her for whatever befalls her.
Sadly, he has stated already that he does. I would have asked him if he would mind a 40 year old man giving them alcohol, and having sex with them, if they felt they were ready at 12 or 13, but i was afraid the answer would disgust me so much, i didn't ask.
Originally posted by 27jd
reply to post by ProtoplasmicTraveler
I wasn't responding to you, sicko. Funny though, the double standard you seem to apply to your own children. Your opinions on their maturity mean nothing, by your beliefs, it's up to them COMPLETELY to decide when they are ready for sex with old men, not you, according to your beliefs. And i am totally honest, if i were in charge, and a person is proven guilty of molesting or raping a child under the age of 16, it would be the death penalty and a gruesome death at that. I do not hide my desire to spill the blood of child predators, i put that right out in the open. It is YOU who is dishonest, disguising and justifying your own disgusting sexual perversions as some higher state of conciousness.
[edit on 30-9-2009 by 27jd]
Originally posted by Aeons
yes, let us allow rich people to pay off victims so that they don't have to go to jail. That's sufficient for our systems of justice.
Sin offerings - they were good enough for Biblical Times, Good Enough for TODAY!
[edit on 2009/9/30 by Aeons]