It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

If You Could Choose One Piece of Evidence From the Tragic Events.....

page: 1
3
<<   2 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 28 2009 @ 11:11 PM
link   
Of September 11th, 2001.....What would it be?

For me there are many pieces that make me question that day.....For some there are few.

But, I think everyone who wants truth and justice about this crime.....was moved by a specific piece....A piece that made you go....WTF....I've been had....These SOBS pulled the wool over my eyes.....

It more than likely happened while watching part of a video/documentary, or reading a passage or paper from a researcher or someone near the event who has solid evidence, a poster on ATS, etc, etc....There are many.

I think we all can agree that all of these can't be true or someone is off a little.....

And....obviously.....I think we all can agree that we were lied to about that day and there are questions that demand answers.


So, In this thread....I ask you to post that one piece of evidence that you think cannot be debunked....A piece you would bet your nest egg on because you're so sure of it.....

No need to go crazy and post multiple video links and write a novel....If you want to....I'm all for it.....

Just a quick paragraph or 2 will do the trick.

My thanks in advance for your input.

I'll start....

As I said....I have many, but if I had to pick one....

It would be a thread found on here regarding the unusual trading that occurred days before the 11th.

This

Thread

Cannot be debunked IMO and leaves me feeling sick and pissed.


What say you?




[edit on 28-9-2009 by Nassim Haramein]




posted on Sep, 28 2009 @ 11:20 PM
link   
Fake Bin Laden Tape...

released December 13th 2001.


archives.cnn.com...

archives.cnn.com...


Yep... That's the piece of evidence that takes the cake for me... clearly not even Osama Bin Laden.



posted on Sep, 28 2009 @ 11:31 PM
link   
reply to post by Doomsday 2029
 


DD,

It gave me this message when I tried to watch..


You are watching promotional video content. CNN.com video is only available with a subscription to CNN NewsPass, RealOne SuperPass, or through select Broadband service providers. If you are already a subscriber, click on More Video for access to all current video. MORE VIDEO



posted on Sep, 28 2009 @ 11:38 PM
link   
reply to post by Doomsday 2029
 


The booms!!
The booms that shook and raised the ground!!
The ground!?!?
WTH?

You could hear the booms from across the river in Hoboken and Jersey City.

The booms the happened well before the buildings collapsed.

No one talks about the booms, but those who were there.

Oh God, I am sick to my stomach!!!



posted on Sep, 28 2009 @ 11:42 PM
link   

Originally posted by reticledc
reply to post by Doomsday 2029
 


The booms!!
The booms that shook and raised the ground!!
The ground!?!?
WTH?

You could hear the booms from across the river in Hoboken and Jersey City.

The booms the happened well before the buildings collapsed.

No one talks about the booms, but those who were there.

Oh God, I am sick to my stomach!!!




I definitely know the booms you describe...That's probably on my top 10....I have seen some videos with some decent audio, but not perfect.

What video do you think displays this "piece" the best?



posted on Sep, 28 2009 @ 11:43 PM
link   
reply to post by Nassim Haramein
 


For me it's all about WTC 7, that is the smoking gun.

Unless the laws of physics went on vacation that day, someone still needs to explain to me how WTC 3, 4, 5, and 6, all which suffered way more damage and were also way closer to the twin towers, did not collapse, but yet conveniently WTC 7 collapsed onto itself like a neat footprint also taking with it some of the most secret offices and incriminating files with it.





Wait did they say "blow up" - Yes they did!


WTC COMPLEX


WTC 3


WTC 4


WTC 5


WTC 6




Let us not forget...

some very interesting tenants housed their offices in building 7, including some very important Enron files that reportedly showed direct ties to GWB.

46-47 Mechanical floors
28-45 Salomon Smith Barney (SSB)
26-27 Standard Chartered Bank
25 Inland Revenue Service (IRS)
25 Department of Defense (DOD)
25 Central Intelligence Agency (CIA)
24 Inland Revenue Service (IRS)
23 Office of Emergency Management (OEM)
22 Federal Home Loan Bank of New York
21 First State Management Group
19-21 ITT Hartford Insurance Group
19 National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC)
18 Equal Opportunity Commission (EEOC)
14-17 Vacant
13 Provident Financial Management
11-13 Securities and Exchange Commission
9-10 US Secret Service
7-8 American Express Bank International
7 OEM generators and day tank
6 Switchgear, storage
5 Switchgear, generators, transformers
4 Upper level of 3rd floor, switchgear
3 Lobby, SSB Conference Center, rentable space, manage
2 Open to first floor lobby, transformer vault upper level, upper level switchgear
1 Lobby, loading docks, existing Con Ed transformer vaults, fuel storage, lower level switchgear




I know, I know all coincidental.



posted on Sep, 28 2009 @ 11:45 PM
link   

Originally posted by Doomsday 2029
Fake Bin Laden Tape...


I've seen a number of sources debating this, and I'm not entirely sure it is faked.

I know the image which has been splashed around the internet certainly makes it look like a different person, but if you read through the link below (and subsequent links from the page) with an open mind, you might feel a little differently about the tape...

www.911myths.com...

Rewey



posted on Sep, 28 2009 @ 11:45 PM
link   
reply to post by Nassim Haramein
 


I was in Hoboken.



posted on Sep, 28 2009 @ 11:47 PM
link   

Originally posted by Doomsday 2029
Fake Bin Laden Tape...

released December 13th 2001.


archives.cnn.com...

archives.cnn.com...


Yep... That's the piece of evidence that takes the cake for me... clearly not even Osama Bin Laden.


I think I misunderstood your evidence.....It's located in the ridiculous article that states that we interview him and we "translated" his words into what exactly happened.

Am I correct? Or were you trying to post a video?



posted on Sep, 28 2009 @ 11:48 PM
link   
For me, I think it would be clear video footage of whatever it was that hit the Pentagon. This seems to be one of the biggest points of debate surrounding 9/11.

Not crappy surveillance camera footage, not rubbish mobile phone footage, but some nice, clear footage of the approach of the object and the impact.

I think that would help a lot of people decide one way or the other...

Rewey



posted on Sep, 28 2009 @ 11:48 PM
link   

Originally posted by reticledc
reply to post by Nassim Haramein
 


I was in Hoboken.



Understood.



posted on Sep, 29 2009 @ 12:39 AM
link   

Originally posted by Doomsday 2029
Fake Bin Laden Tape...

released December 13th 2001.


archives.cnn.com...

archives.cnn.com...


Yep... That's the piece of evidence that takes the cake for me... clearly not even Osama Bin Laden.


You mean this one?


Zoomed in Grey scale Jump to 00:40



(click to open player in new window)


Zoomed in Color Jump to 00:40



(click to open player in new window)


[edit on 29-9-2009 by SLAYER69]



posted on Sep, 29 2009 @ 12:51 AM
link   
WTC 7.

Not struck by a plane
Not hit by a bomb
Structural integrity therefore intact
Catches on fire
The whole building collapses at near free fall speed...

Most people don't know about this and have never heard of it or seen the videos.



posted on Sep, 29 2009 @ 03:36 AM
link   
Three Words...

Laser Dot Shot.



[edit on 29-9-2009 by doctor_drewl]



posted on Sep, 29 2009 @ 03:56 AM
link   

Originally posted by doctor_drewl
Three Words...

Laser Dot Shot.


Here we go again... this has been coverred a bazillion, gazillion times... it's a piece of paper.

Here's another thread on the topic which reached its conclusion just hours ago:

www.abovetopsecret.com...

Try the search function, people. The OP was after small pieces of evidence that could NOT be debunked, not ideas which are debunked on a weekly basis because no-one uses the search function...

Rewey



posted on Sep, 29 2009 @ 06:17 AM
link   
Wow. I can't believe I just wasted eight and a half minutes watching that nonsense...

I'm actually really angry at myself...

Rew



posted on Sep, 29 2009 @ 08:07 AM
link   
reply to post by Seventhdoor
 





WTC 7.

Not struck by a plane
Not hit by a bomb
Structural integrity therefore intact
Catches on fire
The whole building collapses at near free fall speed...

Most people don't know about this and have never heard of it or seen the videos


How about

WTC 7
Struck by 110 story build
Gash 10 floors long in south face
Dozen floors on fire
Burned for 7 hours

Building does not collapse at free fall speed - take 33 sec for entire collapse sequence


There fixed it for you....



posted on Sep, 29 2009 @ 08:38 AM
link   
reply to post by OnTheFelt
 


I, would have yo agree, Why, didn't this building collapse ?And WTC 7 did.
This building had ,tons of damage and ,lots of fire.
What was the explanation for this phenomena ?I never saw anyone explain to us the reason.
www.youtube.com...



posted on Sep, 29 2009 @ 08:55 AM
link   

Originally posted by lycopersicum
reply to post by OnTheFelt
 


I, would have yo agree, Why, didn't this building collapse ?And WTC 7 did.
This building had ,tons of damage and ,lots of fire.
What was the explanation for this phenomena ?I never saw anyone explain to us the reason.
www.youtube.com...


WTC7 collapsing = all world trade center buildings must also collapse, is failed logic.

They aren't the same building, they aren't under the same loads and stresses, it's idiotic to expect every building in the area to behave in exactly the same way because they were all built differently.



posted on Sep, 29 2009 @ 09:41 AM
link   
reply to post by johnmhinds
 


REALLY?! I disagree .But whatever, helps you sleep at night.

What, was so special about Building 7s fires?

Why was the steel in that building so much weaker ,then building 3,4,5,6,?

A fire that is 1700 F. in one building , and a fire that is 1700 F in another building,will have the same effects on any of the steel in any of the buildings,that are of the same thickness ,and carbon content,(a36 steel 1 inch thick 1% carbon will be effected , by a fire that is 1700 f ,no matter where the piece of steel in question is).

So did building 5 have some special ,thermo resistant ,Steel that building 7 didnt have?

Temperature, is temperature,thermodynamics, is thermodynamics,Steel, quality, is steel, quality , No one can change that fact ,Not me, not you,not bush,not cheney ,And not even the mighty CIA,Nore the mighty ATS debunkers . Thermodynamics, is thermodynamics,physics, is physics.

And all where suspended for WTC 1,2,and 7, BUT magicly, thermodynamics and physics started working agin, after those 3 buildings collapsed, building 3,4,5,6,and every other building in the WORLD,started to addhear to thermodynamics and physics laws agin.

YAY for that . Imagine if all High rise structures had to be changed because of WTC 1,2,and 7.SO! glad all returned to normal.



new topics

top topics



 
3
<<   2 >>

log in

join