It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Was Hitler A Woman In Drag? Is the AntiChirst going to be a woman?

page: 1
2

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 28 2009 @ 05:58 PM
link   
Recently I saw the MysteryQuest where they DNA tested what is thought to be Hitler's skull. The tests came back and said that the skull most likely belonged to a female. This got me thinking.

Was Hitler really a woman? He was kind of built like a woman, thin with tiny facial features. He did kind of seem effeminate when you think about it. He was like an angry woman who was always in a rage. I am sure we have all seen that before.
You know what they say there is no wrath like that of an angry woman.

Then this led me to think about Napolean. He was a smallish man and could have also been a woman in reality. So if these two guys were the first Anti-Christs as some say then maybe the last, true antichrist will be a woman in drag.

What could be more anti to Christ the man than being an anti-christ woman, totally opposite in every way to Christ, even gender.

So I think Hitler could have been a woman and so the skull they tested really was his/hers or maybe he was cross-gendered. What a conspiracy it would be if Hitler was really a woman in drag.

I always got a sense from Hitler that he was a female, cross-gendered, or possibly just a homosexual.

[edit on 28-9-2009 by HotDogNoBun]




posted on Sep, 28 2009 @ 06:24 PM
link   
reply to post by HotDogNoBun
 


I visit this site because of the things/ideas people post.

Your's, my friend, has to be the most original to date.

S&F for creativity.

Who the heck knows, you may be right. I once was with a group of co-workers (most female) and I stated that the latin root word for estrogen was "evil".

When they got snotty and asked what the latin root word for testosterone was, I replied, "misunderstood."





posted on Sep, 28 2009 @ 06:26 PM
link   
reply to post by mikerussellus
 




Who the heck knows, you may be right. I once was with a group of co-workers (most female) and I stated that the latin root word for estrogen was "evil".

When they got snotty and asked what the latin root word for testosterone was, I replied, "misunderstood."


Dude, your answers to them were pure genius. If you really think about it, Hitler was a like a woman with a permanent case of PMS.



posted on Sep, 28 2009 @ 06:32 PM
link   
reply to post by HotDogNoBun
 


As strange as he/she was, I wouldn't doubt it. He could've been a hermaphrodite. That might explain the whole "one testicle" thing.



posted on Sep, 28 2009 @ 06:44 PM
link   
Hitler was quite clearly a man... lol...



posted on Sep, 28 2009 @ 06:46 PM
link   
reply to post by Albastion
 


Hmmm why do you think Hitler was a man for sure? Didnt he seem kind of girly?



posted on Sep, 28 2009 @ 06:46 PM
link   
Hitler was a guy, and it is proved by the fact that he had two girlfreinds, his cousin and Ava Braun.



posted on Sep, 28 2009 @ 06:47 PM
link   
reply to post by kingoftheworld
 


Maybe Hitler was a Lesbian, and dont I remember that he never really had sex with Ava? Seems odd to me.



posted on Sep, 28 2009 @ 06:50 PM
link   
reply to post by mikerussellus
 


I think you may be on to something. I heard Hitlers mama had a birth defect to.. they say she had one big breast and one little breast and they called the bitch Biggie Smalls.



posted on Sep, 28 2009 @ 06:52 PM
link   
LOL

Nice hilarious idea

But its a well known fact that he was a man



posted on Sep, 28 2009 @ 06:54 PM
link   
reply to post by OzWeatherman
 


Do we have any proof that he was a man? I cant remember any.



posted on Sep, 28 2009 @ 07:11 PM
link   
ey genius...

how about this..

how about they just have a woman's skull instead of a skull they thought was his...
.
maybe it was the skull of his secretary...

wow...


people come ON...




posted on Sep, 28 2009 @ 07:15 PM
link   

Originally posted by HotDogNoBun
reply to post by OzWeatherman
 


Do we have any proof that he was a man? I cant remember any.



Yep in world war 1 he was injured a few times and was very very lucky not to be killed on a few occasions.

Before he went to the front line he had a medical, and that would include a cough and drop, which is difficult to do with nothing to drop lol.

He had a previous medical for the austrian Army in 1914 but failed as he had been a tramp before that and was too weak.

In addition he would have been deloused when coming from the trenches which involves stripping naked and being covered in powder.

He was gassed and had to be stripped and washed to get the mustard of him....and was in hospital blinded for a while, I am sure the nurses would have noticed lol.

He as said fought in the trenches, and how he would have gone to toilet peeing squatting down with no ne noticing he never had a "member" for years in those sitiuation is ridiculous.

In addition it is known he lost or had one testicle removed, though this is contenscious.

His Entire medical records have been published to.

I respect the far out claim, and indeed there is nothing stopping women being as barbaric as napolean and hitler, my god given the right time nd chance and situation Thatcher would have been lol

But this is stupid and Mods should move this to Skunk.
1
2
3
Elf



posted on Sep, 28 2009 @ 07:24 PM
link   
reply to post by MischeviousElf
 


Well thanks for the info. Do you think he could have been a hermaphrodite and kind of tricked everyone and hidden his condition?



posted on Sep, 28 2009 @ 07:26 PM
link   
nah it's common knowable Hitler was a black dwarf .



posted on Sep, 28 2009 @ 07:30 PM
link   
you got it all damn wrong. the fact that the skull was a female's doesnt mean hitler was, it means he must have faked his death. can u really be that shallow minded?



posted on Sep, 28 2009 @ 07:37 PM
link   
reply to post by HotDogNoBun
 


Your thread got me to thinking, if the skull was a womans, then in fact

where is the real Hitlers skull? How and Where did he "really meet

his demise"?.......interesting...imo.



posted on Sep, 28 2009 @ 07:39 PM
link   
A man--just not all there in several ways

www.straightdope.com...


Did Hitler have only one testicle?
January 1, 1987

Dear Cecil:

For some reason the first of the month always seems to unleash a flood of maudlin memories in my aging landlord, particularly memories of World War II. He's a veteran, and I often hear him singing a certain dirty ditty describing in lurid detail the genital deficiencies of various Axis leaders as he goes about his rounds collecting the rent. The effect is disconcerting, as you can imagine. But now my question: I have heard many versions of this song in the army and often wondered about the validity of the line concerning Hitler. Was he, in fact, fully "endowed," so to speak? Or did he, as the song claims, possess only a single testicle? Was it a congenital defect, or due to some injury? Where did this belief originate? My landlord believes it to this day. Please advise.

— B.D., Santa Monica, California

Cecil replies:

Among conspiracy buffs, this is what is known as (ahem) the lone-nut theory. (Note to the Teeming Millions: Hey, I got a million of 'em.) But let's get serious. The case of Hitler's missing testicle is one of many bizarre twists in the life of one of history's most bizarre hombres. (Another is the never-proven allegation that Hitler's paternal grandfather was Jewish.) The bit of doggerel favored by your landlord probably goes something like the following, originally sung by British Tommies during World War II to the tune of the "Colonel Bogey March":

Hitler has only got one ball,
Goering has two, but very small;
Himmler is very sim'lar,
And Goebbels has no balls at all.

It's customary, of course, for soldiers to impugn the sexual capacities of enemy leaders. (Another verse from the era goes, [Whistle while you work/Hitler was a jerk/Mussolini bit his weenie/Now it doesn't work.]) But the troops may have had some reason to believe Hitler really was playing with a short set, so to speak. As a soldier in the German army during World War I, the future dictator was wounded in the Battle of the Somme in October, 1916. Sources differ on the precise location of the wound, but some say it was in the thigh or the groin. Conceivably some anonymous poet in the British Army heard this and used it as the basis for the abovementioned ode, although at this late date it's hard to say for sure.

At this point we have to delve into the mystery surrounding Hitler's demise. On May 1, 1945, German radio announced that Hitler had been killed fighting at the head of his troops. But the Russians captured the Fuehrer's bunker, and nobody in the West ever saw the body. Rumors swirled that Hitler had escaped. To resolve the issue, the British assigned H.R. Trevor-Roper, later a well-known British historian, to investigate. After interrogating witnesses, Trevor-Roper concluded that Hitler and his girlfriend Eva Braun had shot themselves on April 30, and that the bodies were cremated shortly afterward.

The Russians, however, maintained that Hitler had managed to escape. At the Potsdam conference in July, Stalin said he believed Hitler was in Spain or Argentina. This was the official line until 1950, when the Soviets unveiled a film called The Fall of Berlin that depicted Hitler and Braun snuffing themselves with poison. But they did not say how they arrived at this conclusion.

In 1955 the Russians released several German prisoners who had been present during Hitler's last days, one of whom told of burying Hitler's remains in a bomb crater. Trevor-Roper interviewed the men, and on the basis of their comments deduced that the Russians had exhumed the bodies and examined them in May, 1945. This was confirmed to his satisfaction in the 1960s, when Russian journalists published accounts of the search for Hitler.

One such book published in 1968 was particularly interesting, and it's here we get back to the question of Hitler's missing organs. The book included the report of the autopsy performed on Hitler's bod by Russian pathologists. This contained the startling news that Hitler's "left testicle could not be found either in the scrotum or on the spermatic cord inside the inguinal canal, or in the small pelvis. . . ."

This revelation struck many as suspicious. None of Hitler's doctors or attendants had ever mentioned anything about a missing testicle, and his medical records were silent on the subject. A woman who claimed to have been his lover said he was normally equipped. Moreover, the autopsy report said Hitler's body showed no external wounds, even though all the German witnesses mentioned a shot through the head.

Hitler's World War I company commander, however, offered some support for the Russian finding. He said he'd discovered Hitler's missing testicle as a result of a wartime VD exam.

Questions about the authenticity of the Russian autopsy records were more or less resolved in 1972. Dr. Reidar Sognnaes, a dental expert at the University of California at Los Angeles, compared the Russky data with previous X-rays of Hitler's skull and pronounced the former genuine. (Sognnaes used similar methods to confirm that a body dug up in Berlin was that of Hitler's secretary, Martin Bormann.) So I guess we have to conclude that in some departments, at least, Hitler really wasn't all there.

As you can imagine, historians with a weakness for Freudian woolgathering have had a field day with this news. Perhaps the most elaborate treatment was The Psychopathic God by Robert G.L. Waite. Waite believed Hitler's left testicle either failed to descend at puberty or was missing at birth. He regarded the deficiency as one of the formative experiences of Hitler's life, and said it contributed to all manner of psychosexual complications. He stopped short, however, of saying it caused World War II.

Why did the Russians wait so long to reveal the autopsy results? Trevor-Roper thinks Stalin arbitrarily decided that Hitler had escaped and compelled everybody else to go along. Later, he thinks, the Russians decided to keep things murky lest the Fuehrer's death and/or remains somehow inspire future generations of Nazis. They may have suppressed evidence about the bullet wounds in order to make Hitler's demise seem less heroic.

Others, of course, have their own ideas. They see the missing testicle as evidence that the man who died in 1945 was a double. They think the Russians faked the dental evidence for unknown reasons and that Maria Schickelgruber's grandson ended up leading a life of ease in some South American banana republic.

You never know. After all, Trevor-Roper, the staunchest proponent of the Hitler-is-dead theory, was the same guy who pronounced the so-called Hitler diaries authentic. But the more likely explanation is that your landlord's dirty ditty, in one respect at least, was the simple truth.

— Cecil Adams



posted on Sep, 28 2009 @ 07:46 PM
link   
reply to post by HotDogNoBun
 



You need to sharpen your occam's razor. The simple answer is: It wasn't hitlers skull. But since I like this idea.

What if Hitler really was a woman? That would suck for those hard core feminists.



posted on Sep, 28 2009 @ 08:11 PM
link   
reply to post by Miraj
 


Wow you bring up an interesting point, because those feminists are just like little Lesbian Hitlers. Great call.



new topics

top topics



 
2

log in

join