posted on Sep, 30 2009 @ 01:13 PM
Great essay George. You are indeed a wordsmith worthy of envy.
I have not been able to view the videos on this dysfunctional computer that is my main machine, but will somewhere else and comment again.
It is a little strange that the responses haven't for the most part addressed the issue closely. I think actually, that denotes a general disdain
and disbelief for and about the subject matter. There appears to be some mockery going on, but for the most part that arises in the minds of rather
our non reflective and nonserious portion of our population.
It is pleasing to the ear and soothing to the mind to hear that aliens, ufos, and abductions are pure hogwash. It feels so good to dicount it and
make it untrue in the mind and somehow therefore untrue in the real world. But as we all really know... there are more theories than verifications in
every realm of investigation and quite often our beliefs and desires do not match the facts of the matters involved.
I have met people who have been involved in secret groups who demand their anonymity who don't appear to be reacting off of some phantasmic
experience. There are people in our world who are famous in invisible circles who are working diligently on these exact puzzles.
The gist of at least one thread of your essay talks about the self defeating nature of public involvement with the discussion when one has such
things as a public reputation, job security and the reputation of a respected fictional entity involved. By this I mean: Harvard and etcetera.
That is a very real issue that blocks serious discussion of these matters. Clearly, it is a social constraint. It doesn't matter which group holds
the reins of the constraint. It doesn't appear that this will change. It is at one level too scary to think about personally for people, and at
another level it is too scary to think about for the groups that attempt to maintain some sort of control over population groups. Until such time as
there is a direct and DRAMATIC landing and contact, it will remain this way.
My information leads me to believe that this sort of contact will never occur. Everything will remain as it is until such time as there is an
orchestration in collusion with official groups that have and maintain a relationship with those other people. If it were to occur, it would signal a
change in the structure of our collective existence in such a way that it is questionable as to whether this would really be a postive event or
If the info is to be believed, there is supposedly some sort of universal law that prohibits "interference'. I have to say that I do not quite
understand the definition of the term "interference" at this level. I had asked questions about: Well then, who are the police in this matter?...
and I don't really get a satisfying answer. Who does the judging? Who keeps them all straight?
Extrapolating from our species, lawless societies are chaotic and dangerous societies. So when I am responded to with an over simplistic answer such
as: They don't think like we do. Then my open mindedness becomes a little pressed upon. I don't know what to think about it. It then becomes hard
Meeting people who apparently are in the know, is disturbing. It IS fascinating, but it is disturbing.
People who who do not want to allow themselves to believe in the phenomena are falling under the umbrella of the fallacy: Ignorance is Bliss. In
this case, for them, perhaps there is a note of truth in that.
So here we will remain stuck in the no man's land between belief and reality.
It is one thing to say that the Moon is not made out of blue cheese because I don't want it to be, and another thing to say that the global project
is not real because I don't want it to be. The first statement may match the facts of the matter and the second one may not. It may be a dangerous
thing for people to do the cynical handwaving that they are so accustomed to.
I would say let them be. Let them do the hand waving, the childish insulting and the shouting. Just keep going about the work. When the ears
finally open, then more people will hear you and the others like you.
I have been told, that most people cannot handle the information. That when exposed, they understand it briefly, and then sort of just go back to
sleep trying to forget it. The information must be something of a nature that makes us look very petty and of a form of nothingness. Possibly very
disconcerting for a species mostly motivated by selfishness, ego and desire. In other words: the answer is neither pleasing nor edifying for mankind
The biggest problem of all is that those who are in the know are NOT going to expose themselves and therefore we will not get the clarification we
seek. It must come from the army of investigators of which you are a member. To them it is a matter of principle. I agree with them.