It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
It looks like that "anomaly" is over the Moon and not in the Moon. As Luppakorva said it look to be "flying", and I would add that, for it to look out of focus, it must be close to the camera, but I find it strange for something to be flying around them that close.
Originally posted by easynow
this anomaly is very close to Chaplygin crater
No, you are not the only one, some people have talked about that.
Originally posted by LuppakorvaBut what makes me wonder are these paths what they say they left.
I have understood they were jumping, taking quite a big leaps compared to the ones we are taking here on earth when we are walking and here we are with quite a big path which can be seen from space? Now am I the only one who's wondering how's that possible or did they really do bunny jumping back and forth just for fun to make some visible paths to be seen?
I don't see any problem with that, why shouldn't the module be seen from that place?
Now maybe I'm completely wrong with that but still, it seems that lunar module couldn't be seen from this position. Please let me know your opinions, much appreciated .
Originally posted by Luppakorva
I have understood they were jumping, taking quite a big leaps compared to the ones we are taking here on earth when we are walking and here we are with quite a big path which can be seen from space? Now am I the only one who's wondering how's that possible or did they really do bunny jumping back and forth just for fun to make some visible paths to be seen?
Also, If you take a look at this landing site from NASA pictures when the astronauts have been there. I took a fast look and Surveyor 3 seems to be in position where you can't see LM, yet from the pictures you can easily see it.
Originally posted by Luppakorva
Now then, if you're to walk to one instrument that can be seen in LRO pic maybe that 2-3 times and they have clear paths, how come this area of the very near of the LM is not totally darkened up and can't be seen in that LRO picture?
If it was an airbrush job you wouldn't notice it.
Originally posted by easynow
i have had a few other people look at that photo and they agree with me that it's an airbrush job to hide something.
Originally posted by ArMaP
If it was an airbrush job you wouldn't notice it.
Originally posted by easynow
i have had a few other people look at that photo and they agree with me that it's an airbrush job to hide something.
Do those people to which you showed the photo know how a photo is physically altered?
I don't know if I have any airbrushed photo, a professional airbrushing job is not noticeable even on the original, so in a digital copy it is useless to try to find them
Originally posted by easynow
well ArMaP you wouldn't happen to have a different example of a NASA photograph that has been airbrushed to compare it to do you ?
I will nit pick only when something like that is posted, as if asking to several people would make it real.
are you gonna nit pick everything in this thread or will you maybe contribute something on the positive side of this topic ?
I haven't found the photos I talked about before, to show to Luppakorva, but I am looking for them.
got any links to transcripts or pictures you would like to post ?
As a kind of antecipated PS, airbrushing is only used to cover large areas with the same colour, if they want to hide something or change what is on the photo to something else they use fine brushes to add black ink or stilettos to remove the emulsion.