posted on Sep, 27 2009 @ 07:50 PM
Firstly in regards to Iran's nuclear program:
IAEA: No Evidence That Iran Has Ever Had A Nuclear Weapons Program
The IAEA reiterated September 17, 2009, that it “has no concrete proof that Iran has or has ever had a nuclear weapons programme.”
Iran is smart, they are following all internation laws not giving any chance for a justified war. Umm ofcurse it can be orchestrated like Iraq but if
that happens alot of countries will be pissed off and you know what that means.
But currently let's be obtimistic:
US welcomes Iran inspection offer
Hillary Clinton, the US secretary of state, has welcomed Iran's decision to allow International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) inspectors into a
newly disclosed uranium enrichment plant.
Clinton told reporters in New York on Saturday that "It is always welcome when Iran makes a decision to comply with the international rules and
regulations, and particularly with respect to the IAEA".
They haven't broken any International laws, unlike the US and Israel which are continuing their illegal operations, hence GAZA and DRONE attacks:
According to the BBC, the "overwhelming view" of the international community is that the settlements are illegal based upon Article 49 of the
The consensus view is largely based on UN Security council resolutions, including resolutions 446, 452, 465, 471 and 476 which find the settlements to
be illegal. In Resolution 465 the settlements are even described as a "flagrant violation". Separately also the legal arm of the UN, the
International Court of Justice, has found the settlements to be illegal under international law.
International human rights groups Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch and B'Tselem have denounced the settlements as illegal.
The European Union considers the settlements to be illegal. The reconvened Conference of the High Contracting Parties to the Geneva Conventions
declared in 2001 that the settlements are illegal.
The United Nations General Assembly has passed several resolutions denouncing all settlements in the occupied territories as illegal. Below is a
summary of voting records concerning such resolutions from 2006-2008:
But ofcurse it is Israel, what can we do, we can't bomb Israel for breaking international laws but Iran...
What pisses me off is the fact that some in ATS actually justify the military option against Iran.
No one bombed America for its illegal occupation of Afghanistan and Iraq. No one bombed Israel for taking hostage the whole Gaza blocking it completly
from outside. They are prisoners not allowed to leave, or stay and have a life worth living:
It said a court could find that the blockade of Gaza is itself a crime against humanity. Israel continues to tightly restrict goods entering Gaza
to staples and humanitarian supplies, saying that lifting these restrictions would allow Hamas to smuggle weapons into the Strip.
Why don't we blockade Israel? So they don't get any weapons.
Why isn't military option available against Israel and the US? Or Russia?
I guess it is true even in nation level that if you are rich you can swurve around laws. Just like the rich bastards in individual level who pay
millions to lawyers, and the warlords who have guns therefore can easily avoid justice.
America has both, money and guns, I wish I had that.
Thank you for your time