Top 10 Crazy Universe Theories that were proven True, page 1
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 7 times


reply posted on 27-9-2009 @ 06:59 PM by newworld
reply to post by RussianScientists



Thanks for the link. Although I knew about 80% of the things in there, it is still interesting to read these facts again.

However, I will disagree with the expanding universe and big bang theory in that they are still heavily debated today. Personally, I'm convinced those two theories are sound, but the evidence may still not be enough to convince a great deal of the population.

Expect to see at least those two theories be debated here if your thread is not ignored.


reply posted on 28-9-2009 @ 12:22 AM by Southern Guardian
reply to post by RussianScientists



Thanks for the link

Our universe let alone our Galaxy is larger beyond what anybody can comprehend... who knows what else lies there... I have always been personally into astronomy and Iv always wondered how we humans who deal if we were ever to witness another planet with life.... the creatures and what they would look like.... we would not be able to picture it or understand it... the universe is large and diverse... we humans will never be able to take in much of what may be discovered in time to come....



reply posted on 28-9-2009 @ 01:05 AM by Arbitrageur
Originally posted by newworld
reply to
post by RussianScientists



Thanks for the link. Although I knew about 80% of the things in there, it is still interesting to read these facts again.

However, I will disagree with the expanding universe and big bang theory in that they are still heavily debated today. Personally, I'm convinced those two theories are sound, but the evidence may still not be enough to convince a great deal of the population.

Expect to see at least those two theories be debated here if your thread is not ignored.


I think there's more debate about those by non-professionals than there is by professionals. But there's some debate about them here on ATS in other threads for sure.

I also think it was an interesting link thanks to the OP.


reply posted on 28-9-2009 @ 04:10 PM by RussianScientists
reply to post by Angel One



Hi Angel One,

I think the Universe is a constant size, Ifinity; galaxies and other space bodies contract and expand within it.

I don't believe in the Big Bang Theory either, there are too many holes in that theory. I heard there were several creators, all scientists, that created us and everything else in order to see who created them.

The Earth has to be extremely old, far older than anyone can imagine. It's good to hear from you my friend. Keep studying and get good grades. I'll be getting some videos on YouTube soon, you'll have to tell me what I need to expand on, and/or what I left out.

Take care my friend.


reply posted on 3-10-2009 @ 05:06 AM by Angel One
Hello Again Russian Scientist,

I can report that I am taking chemistry, astronomy, and college algebra and pulling literal strait A's. I am so in tune that school seems easy like high school.

The reason I am opperating so well is that my mental health provider has me medicated such that my abilities that come with my illness are shining in my intellect. The bad stuff is dormant and 137 may honestly now be the low end of my IQ.

I believe that there were Creators plural because the Bible says, "let us create man in our own image". I also believe that high Angels are placed in charge of certain aspects of the Universe but they report to Yaweh the Head of Creation. Calling them scientists would be absolutely accurate because the Universe is very scientific in nature, even spirituality is scientific.

I also believe that the Earth and moon as we know it resulted in a massive collision that tore off approximately 2/3 of the Earths crust and made dry land possible. I have seen a picture of the Earth with the water removed and it clearly looks like a planet with most of its crust torn off.

This will probably be in my geo theory that I am developing as I go through school. I have aspirations to drop a geological calculus theory but I need to learn a lot more before I can elaborate my first equation which I have already named and can express it in words. I will hold my tongue about the heavy details because I know I am on to a discovery.

You are always a pleasant man to converse with and even though my prophecies are dark there is much light to come with it. As a matter of fact I live for that time because that is where I shine and find out who I really am and what I am made of. I can shine as a volcanologist and save lives also. I see great beauty and a lot of good in the world enough worth fighting for. I can also be a great leader and have percieved that happening in dreams as well. My favorite part of that time is that my mutation will fully activate and psychic dreams will be small talk about me.
I also want to develop my own theory of everything such is the reason that I take all kinds of science classes, I see the world very differently than any one else and can add a different way to look at physics in science.

I care greatly about politics and regularly harass the bad guys in government by email. I also communicate my ideas and views to the so called "good guys". I don't have much faith in any of them though because they all seem to be tied together as an evil empire. But enough of politics have a good day Friend, I like the positive threads you have been presenting lately keep it up.



Until next time

Angel One



reply posted on 3-10-2009 @ 06:00 AM by karl 12
reply to post by RussianScientists



Interesting post
Here are some other revealing comments made by scientists in the past:

They were sure it couldn't be done


"No possible combination of known substances, known forms of machinery, and known forms of force, can be united in a practical machine by which man shall fly long distances through the air..."
Simon Newcomb (1835-1909), astronomer,
head of the U.S. Naval Observatory



"Men might as well project a voyage to the Moon as attempt to employ steam navigation against the stormy North Atlantic Ocean".
Dr. Dionysus Lardner (1793-1859)
Professor of Natural Philosophy and Astronomy



"There is no hope for the fanciful idea of reaching the Moon because of insurmountable barriers to escaping the Earth's gravity".
Dr. Forest Ray Moulton, University of
Chicago astronomer, 1932.



"Heavier-than-air flying machines are impossible".
Lord Kelvin (1824-1907)
British mathematician and physicist



"To place a man in a multi-stage rocket and project him into the controlling gravitational field of the moon where the passengers can make scientific observations, perhaps land alive, and then return to earth--all that constitutes a wild dream worthy of Jules Verne. I am bold enough to say that such a man-made voyage will never occur regardless of all future advances".
Lee DeForest,
American radio pioneer, 1926.



"Rail travel at high speed is not possible because passengers, unable to breathe, would die of asphyxia".
Dr. Dionysus Lardner (1793-1859)
Professor of Natural Philosophy and Astronomy



"What can be more palpably absurd than the prospect held out of locomotives travelling twice as fast as stagecoaches?"
The Quarterly Review, England (March 1825)



"We have reached the limits of what is possible with computers".
John Von Neumann, 1949



"Well informed people know it is impossible to transmit the voice over wires and that were it possible to do so, the thing would be of no practical value".
Editorial in the Boston Post, 1865




Nuclear power:

"There is no likelihood man can ever tap the power of the atom. The glib supposition of utilizing atomic energy when our coal has run out is
a completely unscientific Utopian dream,a childish bug-a-boo. Nature has introduced a few fool-proof devices into the great majority of elements that constitute the bulk of the world, and they have no energy to give up in the process of disintegration."
Robert A. Millikan (1863-1953)
Speech to the Chemists' Club (New York)



"Any one who expects a source of power from the transformation of these atoms is talking moonshine..."
Ernest Rutherford (1933)



"There is not the slightest indication that [nuclear energy] will ever be obtainable. It would mean that the atom would have to be shattered at will."
Albert Einstein, 1932.


Cheers.
Pages:     ^^TOP^^



"My God, its full of stars!"
  Posted 19 days ago with 83 member flags
Newfound "super-Earth"
  Posted 8 days ago with 56 member flags
Enceladus Backlit by Saturn
  Posted 2 days ago with 50 member flags
Toronto teens send Lego man into space: video
  Posted 16 days ago with 28 member flags
Amazing new photo of Earth. The Blue Marble 2012
  Posted 12 days ago with 22 member flags
NASA Probe Captures 1st Video of Moon\'s Far Side
  Posted 9 days ago with 19 member flags