It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by bsbray11
Who do you think is legally responsible for the investigation done into 9/11, "GoodOlDave"?
Originally posted by GoodOlDave
Why is *legally* responsible? Noone, actually
Originally posted by bsbray11
Congress actually authorized/charged NIST with handling the forensic evidence and producing a report. They may have done the same for FEMA but I'm not actually sure. However, as soon as you start reading the NIST report, they tell you themselves they were assigned this report by Congress.
So NIST was the one legally responsible for this report, and to find out what happened to the Twin Towers. Not me, not you. So the burden of proof is not legally upon you or I but upon NIST. NIST defends their work, we critique it. And if you already disagree with NIST, then you already support either further investigation or prolonged ignorance.
Originally posted by GoodOlDave
The problem is, are the demands for a new investigation REALLY due to any actual dissent over the findings, or is it merely becuase the people demanding the new investigation prefer to believe in some sinister gov't conspiracy and they will accept no findings which contradict it?
Originally posted by bsbray11
Ok, the Kean Commission was charged to investigate all the other angles you just mentioned. So that's a separate authority, but nonetheless THE legal authority to address with all of our grievances and unanswered questions. So I guess we can agree there is little to no point being at each other's throats to produce this evidence or that evidence, because it's just not our responsibility. If we can demonstrate inadequacies, and missing information, that's all we really have the responsibility to do.
Worry about that when the time comes. For now, why in the hell do you think so many people have reason to believe there was a "sinister gov't conspiracy"? Seriously?
Originally posted by Swampfox46_1999
reply to post by SpartanKingLeonidas
There was no Bin Laden connection in the movie, because there was no CIA/Bin Laden connection. How many times does it have to be said that there were two groups of fighters fighting the Soviets in Afghanistan. One, was the native Afghans who we trained and supplied through Pakistan, the other group were Arabs on Jihad, supported by Bin Laden and others.
There are interviews with Bin Laden from long before Sept 2001 in which he himself states that he had no assistance from the United States.
Originally posted by Swampfox46_1999
reply to post by SpartanKingLeonidas
Have you read this one as well..
"I can sell you the Brooklyn Bridge in five minutes" by P.T. Barnum??
Because if you believe every word in Mr. Coll's books..you will believe anything. Bin Laden didnt need any help (especially from the Great Satan) in what he did in Afghanistan. Nor did he represent his family or the Saudi government for that matter. His hatred of Westerners is deep and well-documented. Which to be honest doesnt really matter, IF the had been a connection, it would just be one more example of us helping someone who then turned on us.
Then you bring up Colonel North. I can only guess you are trying to make an Evel Kinevel sized leap in logic to show a connection between our selling a bunch of mostly broken/obsolete weapons to the Iranians and Osama Bin Laden. In which case, you have achieved the same result as Evel....crash and burn.
You do realize that Iranians and Arabians arent the same right?