No More Proof Needed: Swine Flu IS A BIO-WEAPON! (enough said!), page 3

reply to post by Donkey_Dean

---

Originally posted by Donkey_Dean

Did you know every man woman and child on earth could have two acres in Texas. It is not by killing of portions of the populous that humankind will endure, in fact this ecosystem is doomed with or with or without us. 98% of all species that have ever existed are now extinct!

I have been hearing variations of this statement for a long time, and my curiosity finally made me try and do the math myself. Now, I am not a math person, but after some time and patience I have to say that either I am really bad at math, or... you are even worse (or worse yet, you just heard this somewhere and passed it on as truth before confirming it yourself). Anyway, please correct me if I have made mistakes in my logic here:

Texas = 268,820 sq miles
one sq mile = 640 acres
world population = 6,706,993,152


268,820 sq miles * 640 acres per sq mile = 172,044,800 acres in Texas.


172,044,800 acres / 6,706,993,152 people = .025 acres per person

2 acres / 0.0256 acres per person = 78

That's about seventy eight times less than your proposed 2 acres per person.

Now, lets see if it works for the entire continent of North America!
__________________________________________

North American Continent = 9,540,000 square miles

9,540,000 square miles * 640 acres per sq mile = 6,105,600,000 acres

6,105,600,000 acres / 6,706,993,152 people = 0.91 acres per person.

Keep in mind that the square mileage for North America includes Central America and all of northern Canada, as well as Greenland (of which over 80% is covered in ice), and large amounts of other inhospitable territories.

So, in conclusion, according to my very basic math skills, you would need about 2.2 times the area of the North American continent of (hospitable) land in order to provide every man, woman and child on earth with 2 acres of land.

Deny (Spreading) Ignorance (and please correct my math if it's wrong!)

Originally posted by Teebs
reply to post by Donkey_Dean

---

Originally posted by Donkey_Dean

Did you know every man woman and child on earth could have two acres in Texas. It is not by killing of portions of the populous that humankind will endure, in fact this ecosystem is doomed with or with or without us. 98% of all species that have ever existed are now extinct!

I have been hearing variations of this statement for a long time, and my curiosity finally made me try and do the math myself. Now, I am not a math person, but after some time and patience I have to say that either I am really bad at math, or... you are even worse (or worse yet, you just heard this somewhere and passed it on as truth before confirming it yourself). Anyway, please correct me if I have made mistakes in my logic here:

Texas = 268,820 sq miles
one sq mile = 640 acres
world population = 6,706,993,152


268,820 sq miles * 640 acres per sq mile = 172,044,800 acres in Texas.


172,044,800 acres / 6,706,993,152 people = .025 acres per person

2 acres / 0.0256 acres per person = 78

That's about seventy eight times less than your proposed 2 acres per person.

Now, lets see if it works for the entire continent of North America!
__________________________________________

North American Continent = 9,540,000 square miles

9,540,000 square miles * 640 acres per sq mile = 6,105,600,000 acres

6,105,600,000 acres / 6,706,993,152 people = 0.91 acres per person.

Keep in mind that the square mileage for North America includes Central America and all of northern Canada, as well as Greenland (of which over 80% is covered in ice), and large amounts of other inhospitable territories.

So, in conclusion, according to my very basic math skills, you would need about 2.2 times the area of the North American continent of (hospitable) land in order to provide every man, woman and child on earth with 2 acres of land.

Deny (Spreading) Ignorance (and please correct my math if it's wrong!)

Of course your not factoring in families, that would SIGNIFICANTLY reduce the area you assert!

reply to post by chiron613

---

I had to star you for your informative post.I do disagree however with this part of it:

No mystery, no conspiracy, nothing much to talk about.

If there were nothing much to talk about why are the media,and even the president(even showing us how to cough?),making such a big deal of it?
________________________________________________________________
I'm just thinking big pharma is the one behind most of this fear mongering,as they have the most to gain....and yet,I don't want the vaccine.

I don't usually get the normal flu shot either for that matter,why would I want this one? I DO think there is something to it,if only testing of some sort.There are simply way too many studies coming out of the MAYO clinic and elsewhere planning on the follow-up to these vaccines.That gives me an uneasy feeling about the entire situation.

reply to post by Teebs

---

For the record,I've got my flag out and I'm claiming my lot in a warm climate.I can't take that cold and ice up there in Greenland...and I'd prefer to be away from the cities-if at all possible

reply to post by Outlawstar

---

Originally posted by Outlawstar

Of course your not factoring in families, that would SIGNIFICANTLY reduce the area you assert!

"Of course I'm not", indeed. The only things I am factoring in are the facts and the statement that was made which again, was:

Originally posted by Donkey_Dean

Did you know every man woman and child on earth could have two acres in Texas.

The statement says nothing about families, it says two acres for EVERY man woman and child. So why would I factor in something that wasn't in the original statement?

I also didn't factor in the 2.5% of land area in Texas that is water, nor the 10% of Texas that is desert.

reply to post by remymartin

---

Your two articles are very interesting reads. In Virology, they discuss the findings that the 1977, and the 1950 viruses are very similar.

This is very interesting, as an article on PubMed also shows that:

the 2009 viral sequences are evolutionarily widely different form the past few years' sequences.

Rather, the 2009 sequences are evolutionarily more similar to the most ancient sequence reported in the NCBI Influenza Virus Resource Database collected in 1918.

So the Swine Flu Virus is very similar to that of 1918, despite so many years between the two.

As your Virology article stated:

If the H1N1 viruses had been replicating in an animal host for 27 years [1950 vs. 1977], far more genetic differences would have been identified. The authors suggested several possibilities, but only one is compelling:

…it is possible that the 1950 H1N1 influenza virus was truly frozen in nature or elsewhere and that such a strain was only recently introduced into man.

The suggestion is clear: the virus was frozen in a laboratory freezer since 1950, and was released, either by intent or accident, in 1977.

So let's assume the same was done with the 1918 virus strain.

Another article from Nature:

indicates that infection with the 1918 pandemic virus or closely related human H1N1 viruses, but not infection with antigenically divergent human H1N1 viruses circulating in the 1920s to 1950s, and again since 1977, elicited neutralizing antibodies to S-OIVs [Swine Flu Virus).

As the article is not easy to read, you can find a summary at Medical News Today. The say:

The ability to infect deep inside the lungs is similar to that of other pandemic viruses, including the 1918 strain that killed tens of millions of people around the world, said the researchers.

It also bears other similarities to the 1918 strain in that people born before 1918 have antibodies that protect against today's pandemic strain.

reply to post by Critical_Mass

---

My wife is a doctor and scientist, and is trying to convince her colleagues not to take the vaccine, as health care workers are at the top of the list.

She has read enough journal articles with studies proving that the virus couldn't have happened naturally.

The vaccine is also so full of dangerous ingredients, even the President of Taiwan claimed that it's not 100% safe. So everyone's waiting for him to take it, before they even get close to it.

My wife is now infected with the swine flu, so luckily she doesn't need to take the vaccine anymore. Her colleagues also refused the vaccine in the end.

Anyway, so far the swine flu is not at all so bad. We're just worried about the second wave. This is not the end of the swine flu, even if the first wave has pretty much passed. A human made flu will not pass with so little damage. That would be a waste of lab research and development. Believe me, there's more to it.

reply to post by whatukno

---

There's a difference between the H1N1 human virus and the Swine Flu virus. The H1N1 human virus is normal and just gives you the normal flu, but we are talking about the swine flu virus here.

To see the difference, you can read this article in Nature or read the summary HERE.

Is it really so harmless?

reply to post by RobinB022

---

Yeah, this first wave wasn't yet so bad, so it does appear as a test run. That's probably why we're always being told the autumn wave will be worse since it's the cold season. Whenever the real thing comes, it won't be pleasant...just hope it doesn't.

reply to post by chiron613

---

But did you see a patent discussing the swine flu virus/vaccines before? H1N1 is a normal human flu virus. The swine flu virus is the problem we're dealing with this year, which is similar to the 1918 virus strain...

Here is another posting of a swine flu patent going way back and it has been researched over 10 years with lots of charts over 140 pages. I bet this is related to Chemtrail Spraying!

www.scribd.com...

reply to post by The only 1 who knows the

---

Thanks for the link. This one I also checked out before. Apparently article 33 is of significance, but means nothing to non-scientists like me Something about modifications to the HA gene...

reply to post by MightyAl

---

This article from the Science Magazine might give a better idea of the HA (Hemagglutinin) gene and its connection to the pandemic and 1918. It's very interesting and disturbing when we think about article 33 in the Medimmune document:

Recombination in the Hemagglutinin Gene of the 1918 "Spanish Flu"

Mark J. Gibbs,* John S. Armstrong, Adrian J. Gibbs

When gene sequences from the influenza virus that caused the 1918 pandemic were first compared with those of related viruses, they yielded few clues about its origins and virulence.

Our reanalysis indicates that the hemagglutinin gene, a key virulence determinant, originated by recombination. The "globular domain" of the 1918 hemagglutinin protein was encoded by a part of a gene derived from a swine-lineage influenza, whereas the "stalk" was encoded by parts derived from a human-lineage influenza.

Phylogenetic analyses showed that this recombination, which probably changed the virulence of the virus, occurred at the start of, or immediately before, the pandemic and thus may have triggered it.

Division of Botany and Zoology, Faculty of Science, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia

[edit on 28-9-2009 by MightyAl]

reply to post by dragonridr

---

Mate..the weapon is the vaccine, not the virus.

The virus was created in order to COMPEL people to have the vaccine.

Isn't it obvious to anyone with half a brain? The virus has a .007% (Yes, point zero, zero, seven %) mortality rate...less than 1 death per 1000 infections...and huge areas of the world are being forced to take a vaccine for a virus that carries a lower death rate than...seasonal flu. A MUCH lower death rate actually.

Why is that?

Why are TPTB/WHO SO determined to criminalize people who say no to the vaccine? Why are the so driven to force millions and millions of people to take a vaccine, that at BEST would have a 10% effective rate, and cause more disabilities and deaths that the virus would, even if the vaccine were not 'dodgy'?

Is it all about money for the vaccine makers?

Partly, but this cannot be the main motivation behind this worldwide drive to inject the population with this stuff. Why? Because the vaccine makers already have the money for their wares. The WHO and other 'health' bigwigs, already have their kickbacks and bribes...why pass laws to make the people have the vaccine, if it were just about profit?

If you have an analytical mind, and free time on your hands...research every subject you can possibly find regarding the timeline of events and strange 'coincidences' that stink to high heaven regarding this virus/vaccine plot.

Because whether you want to accept it or not, is irrelevant, it is real..it is happening, and soon it will be too late to do anything about it.

The reason 'they' don't just dump poison in the water supplies for example, is that this can be detected and traced, and of course prevented.

Also, with an indiscriminate delivery system such as water or air (chemtrails), they cannot pick and choose who will be exposed and who will not be. If your name is on a computer being ticked off after you get the vaccine, they will know exactly who they have gotten to.

reply to post by Revealation

---

Exactly.

Also, what you very rarely hear on the MSM or anywhere else officially is an explanation of how can a vaccine, developed for and containing antigens for a particular strain of virus, can possibly be of any use if, AS THEY KEEP TELLING US, the virus mutates and become more virulent?

Essentially we have a vaccine for the current version of the SF virus yes?
(assuming it's as advertised)

They say the vaccine is for protecting the populace during the fall/winter period when they expect it to become more virulent (mutate). The vaccine makers CANNOT possibly tailor a vaccine for a mutation that has not even occurred yet!

It can't be to protect the public from the current form of SF virus, as it's (relatively) harmless, in terms of killing people.

An analogy would be: You have a Ford car and you need a replacement part for it. You go along to a parts dealer who sells Ferrari spares. But the parts won't fit? They are both cars, they both take fuel, they both have four wheels, the both have doors, windows and an engine, and they both transport you from A - B.

Yet the parts from a Ferrari will not fit into a Ford, despite their apparent similarities.

It's the same thing with vaccines. One vaccine, will not work for all virus. A vaccine tailored to fit a 'Ford', will not fit a 'Ferrari'.

Yet here we are...forced vaccinations...people being fired if they refuse. People threatened with detention at a 'facility' or huge, unrealistic fines for non compliance.

The whole thing is rotten to the core.

Another Bug, Worse than the Last Bug - Flesh Eater Spreading
  Posted 9 days ago with 20 member flags

Superbugs spied off the Antarctic coast
  Posted 9 days ago with 14 member flags

NYC Employers Now REQUIRE Yearly H1N1 Shot - Or you\'re FIRED!
  Posted 7 days ago with 6 member flags

Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria Found in 37 U.S. States
  Posted 5 days ago with 6 member flags

Bird flu \'censorship\' decision
  Posted 12 days ago with 5 member flags

No way of stopping leak of deadly new flu, says terror chief
  Posted 4 days ago with 5 member flags

Schmallenberg Virus affects European Livestock
  Posted 4 days ago with 5 member flags

CDC: Morgellons Disease May Be Psychiatric Disorder
  Posted 16 days ago with 4 member flags

Newest topics, updated in real-time:

Newest topics getting flags, in real-time:

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time: