It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


The G-20 "protests", Police States, & self fulfilling prophecies

page: 1

log in


posted on Sep, 26 2009 @ 08:34 AM
I posted this as a reply to another thread about this topic but it was just lost in the name calling and E-fighting that so many thread discussions become nowadays.

While I completely agree that obama and cronies, bankers, etc, are TRYING to implement a fascist state of some order, you DO NOT see the cops doing this at the tea parties. Reason? The crowds at the tea parties are not a bunch of adolescents destroying, burning, throwing, and overturning things. You don't want the cops to chase you down in riot gear, then don't riot, YET anyways.

My guess is, ironically, an overwhelming majority of these people were/are obama supporters. They supposedly are against much of what obama is for yet they can't see his connection. They believe in so much of the "nonsense" they hear they cannot separate fact from fiction nor contradiction from comparison. I think this makes them so confused that they subconsciously lash out with wild, UNCONTROLLED protest at what so many of us rightfully fear. They just don't know how to process all the information nor act appropriately to it.

This mentality and the actions it produces WILL pit police and military against "the people", not stand with them. Act mature and civil, not like the animals you protest, and the enemy can never win as the truth is always victorious in the end. The vast majority of Law enforcement and even larger percentage of the military stand side by side with the people who see the threats we face BUT if you attack them , they will try to stop you, wouldn't you if you were in their shoes?

Prove we are the better side with your actions and if it comes to it, armed revolt will be met with little resistance.
If force ends up being the only option to stop the growing evil (I do unfortunately think it may be) , everything will go much smoother and have much more of a following if sanity was not discarded along the way. We still have not used all civil options we have at our disposal to stop this.

All it is going to take is one act of ignorant violence to dis-rail the whole revolution that is under way to take back our country.

On another note,

I know many of these protesters are against capitalism. Stop and think about it, we do not have true capitalism, we have crony capitalism. The inept and greedy are not allowed to fail thanks to their buddies in Washington. In a true capitalist system, the market would weed all the aholes that are in power out. Think of it like survival of the fittest. What we have now is survival of the connected.

While no system is perfect, TRUE capitalism gives the most people the best chance of self and community fulfillment. I know many have been brainwashed to think it is evil but thats because we have not had that system for 100 years. We have the warped system I discussed above. We definitely do not want to have an even more warped and freedom taking system that the progressives envision.

True capitalism keeps in check entities like walmart, bank of America, and goldman sachs. It allows and ensures local-ism (small local business and farms).

True capitalism comes with booms and busts with the busts being short and new opportunity is opened up when it is over. Its like a forest fire that is allowed to burn itself out. New growth flourishes once its over and the risk of fire is gone for a long time. Fresh and green doesn't burn well.

What we have now still has booms and busts but the busts last much longer, like a forest fire that is fought and contained. It keeps reigniting, taking a long time to put out. And when its all over, there is still loads of unburned old fuel that will just be part of the next fire. And because all that fuel was left, the fires come over and over again instead of once every 50-100 years.

Making money and bettering yourself is NOT evil as long as you do not actively hurt someone getting it. You have been told that individualism and personal exceptional-ism is bad to keep you down because the greedy bast#@ds don't want the competition. Its just one of the "tools" they use to keep you confused, angry, and divided. It is all about the consolidation of power.

As long as one remembers the pursuit of money and (some) material goods in and of itself does NOT create supreme happiness nor completeness, it does bring comfort and prosperity, and is PART of a healthy, fulfilled life when in balance with family, friends, hobbies, etc,

[edit on 26-9-2009 by I_am_Spartacus]

posted on Sep, 26 2009 @ 09:38 AM
Yes the controlled media is always connecting our problems and the Actions of the crooks in Washington DC to the word "Capitalism" Painting Capitalism with a black brush is definitely intentional. Here is a first hand example of how the "controlled media" does it.

Remember in the eighties a sudden "POLYSTYRENE IS BAD FOR THE ENVIRONMENT" campaign? It was started by a New Hampshire grade School teacher. Ever wonder how and why a school teacher achieved a nation wide media blitz in a couple of weeks and John Munsell still can not get any traction on HACCP. HACCP is the CAUSE of all the tainted food in the USA, yet despite TWO congressional investigations the media still will not touch the issue.

I was behind the scenes on that one and can tell you the real story. First, many of the "facts" in the news story were complete lies, nothing new there. Here is the true reason why polystrene came under attack. Polysar, Sweetheart Plastics and McDonald's had come up with a really great solution to the polystrene garbage problem. The plans were drawn up, the land was bought and the ads was due to air on TV the month after the "POLYSTYRENE IS BAD FOR THE ENVIRONMENT" campaign took the country by storm.

All of the nonfood material used at McDonald's was going to be polystyene molded by Sweetheart Plastics.. A factory was going to be set up to separate the polystyene from the other waste and prepare it to be recycled by Polysar, a polystyrene production company. The factory was specially designed for the employment of physically handicapped people. Since my boss was chief Engineer on the project, I was aware of the details and we were all proud to have come up with a great solution that not only helped the environment but employed those who normally have difficulty getting a job.

This project would show how capitalism is not always evil so it had to be shot down and it was very swiftly and very effectively. Polysar and Sweetheart were not allowed to defend themselves and the "overlord" controlled Activists swarmed and savaged polystyrene and plastics in general. The result? No new factory, no solution to plastic pollution, more trees cut down, bigger garbage dumps and five factories in Massachusetts alone shutdown and their employees tossed out of work.

posted on Sep, 26 2009 @ 09:55 AM
Compare my story above to the scam set up by another Massachesetts corporation, who supposedly was going to "save the environment" Molten Metal Technology Inc. supposedly was working with technologies to separate radioactive and nonradioactive metals.

Chief players are VP Al Gore and the Father of the Environmental Movement and Global Warming, Maurice Strong. Maurice Strong is a hardened socialist, friend to the USSR and Red China for the last fifty years and currently residing in China as their chief advisor.

The tawdry tale of the top two global warming gurus in the business world goes all the way back to Earth Day, April 17, 1995 when the future author of “An Inconvenient Truth” travelled to Fall River, Massachusetts, to deliver a green sermon at the headquarters of Molten Metal Technology Inc. (MMTI). MMTI was a firm that proclaimed to have invented a process for recycling metals from waste. Gore praised the Molten Metal firm as a pioneer in the kind of innovative technology that can save the environment, and make money for investors at the same time.

“Gore left a few facts out of his speech that day,” wrote EIR. “First, the firm was run by Strong and a group of Gore intimates, including Peter Knight, the firm’s registered lobbyist, and Gore’s former top Senate aide.”

(Fast-forward to the present day and ask yourself why it is that every time someone picks up another Senate rock, another serpent comes slithering out).

“Second, the company had received more than $25 million in U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) research and development grants, but had failed to prove that the technology worked on a commercial scale. The company would go on to receive another $8 million in federal taxpayers’ cash, at that point, its only source of revenue.

“With Al Gore’s Earth Day as a Wall Street calling card, Molten Metal’s stock value soared to $35 a share, a range it maintained through October 1996. But along the way, DOE scientists had balked at further funding. When in March 1996, corporate officers concluded that the federal cash cow was about to run dry, they took action: Between that date and October 1996, seven corporate officers–including Maurice strong–sold off $15.3 million in personal shares in the company, at top market value. On Oct. 20, 1996–a Sunday–the company issued a press release, announcing for the first time, that DOE funding would be vastly scaled back, and reported the bad news on a conference call with stockbrokers.

“On Monday, the stock plunged by 49%, soon landing at $5 a share. By early 1997, furious stockholders had filed a class action suit against the company and its directors. Sourc e

new topics

log in