Larry King Interview With Ahmadinejad (25/9/09), page 2
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 5 times


reply posted on 26-9-2009 @ 09:24 AM by oozyism
reply to post by oozyism



In regards to the holocaust, I think Ahmadinajad has a neutral position. Because #1 he is not a historian and #2 Holocaust is used to justify the treatment of Palestinians.

So if I was in his position I would do the same. I would ask questions.

The notion that 'winners write the history' applies here. Germany was the unfortunate losers.

Here is a comparison, you can see how America will be remember when history is rewritten. America will be defeated sooner or later.

Final Solution

[edit on 26-9-2009 by oozyism]


reply posted on 26-9-2009 @ 09:24 AM by john124
reply to post by sticky



Dear John,

I've seen more Anti-Iranian comments from you in the past two days than anyone else on ATS.

It seems nearly obvious to me what your agenda is.


I'm not anti-Iranian, can you even get that correct for a start!?

Yes I'm a supporter of the Iranian opposition, and I don't think I need to justify why, it should be obvious.

Oh an agenda??!! Can someone not be anti-Israel without an agenda on ATS?!

Can I discuss an issue without silly accusations?

[edit on 26-9-2009 by john124]


reply posted on 26-9-2009 @ 09:33 AM by john124
reply to post by oozyism



That is where Ahmadi has used a strawman argument, as Israel does not use the holocaust as an excuse for mal-treatment of palestinians.

So if I was in his position I would do the same. I would ask questions.


What questions does he ever ask any historian not tied to the regime, please give evidence that he actually asks waht he claims he desires to ask, but seemingly never bothers to discuss or ask?!

The notion that 'winners write the history' applies here. Germany was the unfortunate losers.


Haha, so unfortunate that the Nazi's lost! Unbelievable! I find your simplistic logic to be inept.

Here is a comparison, you can see how America will be remember when history is rewritten. America will be defeated sooner or later.


The analogy is again too simplistic.

[edit on 26-9-2009 by john124]


reply posted on 26-9-2009 @ 09:34 AM by oozyism
Originally posted by john124
reply to
post by oozyism



Oh really!? Check my previous post.

The original agreement required Iran to submit such information no later than 180 days before the introduction of nuclear material into the facility

www.iaea.org...


reply posted on 26-9-2009 @ 09:37 AM by oozyism
reply to post by john124



Why does Israel keep violating International laws and get away with it? That is the point Ahmadinajad is making, you don't have to be a genius to understand that.

Going to sleep

Just before going to sleep I just want to tell you that I'm the only guy who gave you a star and a flag, and it is because you went through the effort to gain those videos and let us watch. Thanks again. Good night.

oozy

[edit on 26-9-2009 by oozyism]


reply posted on 26-9-2009 @ 09:41 AM by john124
Originally posted by oozyism
reply to
post by john124



Why does Israel keep violating International laws and get away with it? That is the point Ahmadinajad is making, you don't have to be a genius to understand that.

Going to sleep

oozy


So that gives the Iranian govt an excuse to violate international laws. It's just a method of distracting the viewers.


reply posted on 26-9-2009 @ 09:46 AM by john124
Originally posted by oozyism
Originally posted by john124
reply to
post by oozyism



Oh really!? Check my previous post.

The original agreement required Iran to submit such information no later than 180 days before the introduction of nuclear material into the facility

www.iaea.org...


Despite the fact that Iran tried to unlawfully unilaterally repudiate the agreement, Ahmadi lies about telling the IAEA about this installation to cover-up that they did not tell the IAEA. The regime later tells the IAEA 3 days ago after being rumbled, and Ahmadi's lies are proven to be lies to cover up more lies about international laws being broken.

Of course the regime will spin in between these lies that enrichment processes have not begun, because it's the best lie that they can come up with now we know the facility exists, that they think they will get away with.


[edit on 26-9-2009 by john124]


reply posted on 26-9-2009 @ 10:33 AM by InTrueFiction
It was an interesting interview not only for what was said but also for the simple fact that the interview happened. That in itself discredits anyone who would suggest that Iran is a country bent on isolating itself hating every other nation and hoping the whole world dies. No... Iran is in my opinion a country like any other country that wants to develop and therefore join the world in economical, finantial and technological growth.

He obviously has different views on the WW2 holocaust but it does raze the question - why was the holocaust and the Jewish people murdered during it more important than the countless people that are murdered nowadays fruit of our world's current dictatorships, greed, xenophobia and hatred. Why is the holocaust so important to us but the countless people that have died in Africa's nations and as a result of our many wars throughout the decades ever since simply don't seem to matter?

And he asks a question that is very unpopular but to be honest has been in my mind too for a long time - why did the Palestinian people lose their land over the holocaust and WW2? Why were they punished? Why does the international community that is so humane and righteous that they never forget the WW2 holocaust keep ignoring the unlawful occupation of Palestinian land? Did someone just decided that if you're Palestinian you do not have as much right to live and own land as everyone else on the planet?

In the end it is easy to point fingers. To look at Iran's faults in government and point them out as proof of how much those people don't have as much a right to be in the planet as we do. All I ask is why? Iraq was invaded - my country's troops were there against the population's wishes - because they said they had weapons of mass destruction, they didn't, they were tied to Al Qaeda, they weren't... doesn't matter - regardless of the fact hundreds of thousands have been killed it doesn't matter because no matter what they're the bad guys and don't deserve to live anyway?

Shouldn't we the self-proclaimed civilized nations of the world eventually look in the mirror?

Cheers.


reply posted on 26-9-2009 @ 12:29 PM by dashar
hi darrensharon or dashar.
i think president of iran is wise and possible sincere but also very carefull
of the wests intentions .
its possible they the iranian elite know more than any one here of the nwo agendas .
He could be terrified of loseing control of iran as he loves the country and people ,HE is protecting them from what he regards decadent western trends.
i think that is somewhat a good thing.
I can not go to our local parks, they are full gangs of drunken thugs in the day and night on cocaine, then the next day a huge police presence gangs go diff place, Anyway whats worse ?. {i think both are bad }.
This is what happens without moral leadership over the past 30 years.
if i atempt or report crime or shouting abuse lets say anything the kids want to do they can, i am not against race or antigay.antirights most who get police involved regret it.
police treat the person family reporting a matter worse than the offenders .
my neighbours do not use the police anymore.
keep the western industrial corporations influence in the world ( iran ) to a minimum or impose strict rules on what is good and aceptable and your kids will grow up much better ( not teaching about masturbation at age five is one thing i can think of ) .
Hollywood as more to answer for than any one other source of coruption to the human spirit and phyche (forgive spelling i am british }

i think
if iran cooparated fully with the west with rockafella and the elite they wouldnt mention is atempt at nukes,
also if they was to let the companys of the west into the iran without restriction { which is what they want} then they can and will influence the people.with the agenda
[edit on 26-9-2009 by dashar]

[edit on 26-9-2009 by dashar]

[edit on 26-9-2009 by dashar]


reply posted on 26-9-2009 @ 01:20 PM by really
reply to post by MorgothaM



If you're talking about violence against people in general then no.
If you're talking about what happened at the G-20 demonstrations vs the "democratic proceedings" then the difference is in the severity. Crowds be dispersed by rubber bullets and tear gas, while awful and uncalled for, is not killing and raping.
The difference between the Israelis and Palestinians and Iran is that I was referring to how President Ahmadinejad treats his "own" people. Not some other group. I was not trying to compare him to other people or regimes. A lot of people on this thread are lauding him as some wonderful guy. He's not. That's what I am trying to make clear.


reply posted on 26-9-2009 @ 01:23 PM by Kram09
reply to post by really



He isn't a nice guy then?

So he must have been pretty rude when you met him then?

Oh wait.....you haven't met him have you?

You've got no idea.
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>    ^^TOP^^



Young Israelis and Palestinians Flash Mob for Peace
  Posted 7 days ago with 37 member flags
Zionists , Stop the War Against Iran Now!
  Posted 6 days ago with 34 member flags
Zionist regime well within Iran missile reach: MP
  Posted 8 days ago with 25 member flags
Israel no match for Iran military might
  Posted 9 days ago with 21 member flags
Iran to announce "very important" nuclear achievements
  Posted 2 days ago with 21 member flags