Help ATS with a contribution via PayPal:
learn more

Obama warns Iran: 'come clean' on nukes

page: 2
2
<< 1   >>

log in

join

posted on Sep, 26 2009 @ 09:59 PM
link   

Originally posted by Spectre0o0
by the way, does anyone really remember why we're in afghanistan?
it was so haliburton could build a pipelie from turkisministan to pakistan.
the taliban said no,and away we went.

please help me figure out why obama is continuing a war started for a BIG CORPORTION???????????????????????


sorry...double posted and figured i'd use the space.

[edit on 26-9-2009 by Spectre0o0]



is this for sure?....
i dont think canada would have went if so.

there was many reasons




posted on Sep, 26 2009 @ 10:12 PM
link   

Originally posted by spellbound

Iran is a horrible place full of liars.




You must be confusing Iran with Washington (or Israel or London or France). I'm amazed that the anti-Iran, pro-Israeli message is the only thing we hear on every single mainstream media outlet.



posted on Sep, 26 2009 @ 10:16 PM
link   
''''...Iran needs nuclear power to progress.
It's that , or coal-fired . Iran has promised
the world, on numerous occasions, that this
is strictly peaceful, and so will comply fully
with all international requirements.


....cliff-top tango...



posted on Sep, 30 2009 @ 03:53 PM
link   
www.unitedagainstnucleariran.com...

This link is interesting. There are also commercials during morning prime time for "United against Nuclear Iran".

The propaganda is in place.



posted on Sep, 30 2009 @ 06:00 PM
link   

Originally posted by Spectre0o0

(snip)
old barry had to get up in front of the g20 and pump his chest,so he could act like he belongs in the yard with the big dogs.
(snip)

[edit on 26-9-2009 by Spectre0o0]


I was thinking the same thing; this is scripted..

The most politically correct way to war monger: threaten to ruthlessly vaporize Iranian children to defend Israel.

Everyone knows those godless Iranians have doo doo in their souls and deserve their ass-kicked for not bowing to the empire... who do they think they are failing to OBEY Obama?

Keep in mind people.. Israel is only 5683 miles from New York, right next door like Russia.. if we don't fight them there, before you know it.. Iranians will be advancing on Buffalo and your kids will be speaking Farsi and praying to Allah in school. Time for action is NOW!.. before it's too late!! /sarcasm



posted on Sep, 30 2009 @ 06:33 PM
link   


The facility in question, said to be located on a secret Iranian military installation outside of the holy city of Qom and capable of housing up to 3,000 centrifuges used to enrich uranium, had been monitored by the intelligence services of the US and other nations for some time. But it wasn't until Monday that the IAEA found out about its existence, based not on any intelligence "scoop" provided by the US, but rather Iran's own voluntary declaration. Iran's actions forced the hand of the US, leading to Obama's hurried press conference Friday morning.

Beware politically motivated hype. While on the surface, Obama's dramatic intervention seemed sound, the devil is always in the details. The "rules" Iran is accused of breaking are not vague, but rather spelled out in clear terms. In accordance with Article 42 of Iran's Safeguards Agreement, and Code 3.1 of the General Part of the Subsidiary Arrangements (also known as the "additional protocol") to that agreement, Iran is obliged to inform the IAEA of any decision to construct a facility which would house operational centrifuges, and to provide preliminary design information about that facility, even if nuclear material had not been introduced. This would initiate a process of complementary access and design verification inspections by the IAEA.

This agreement was signed by Iran in December 2004. However, since the "additional protocol" has not been ratified by the Iranian parliament, and as such is not legally binding, Iran had viewed its implementation as being voluntary, and as such agreed to comply with these new measures as a confidence building measure more so than a mandated obligation.

In March 2007, Iran suspended the implementation of the modified text of Code 3.1 of the Subsidiary Arrangements General Part concerning the early provisions of design information. As such, Iran was reverting back to its legally-binding requirements of the original safeguards agreement, which did not require early declaration of nuclear-capable facilities prior to the introduction of nuclear material.

While this action is understandably vexing for the IAEA and those member states who are desirous of full transparency on the part of Iran, one cannot speak in absolute terms about Iran violating its obligations under the nuclear non-proliferation treaty. So when Obama announced that "Iran is breaking rules that all nations must follow", he is technically and legally wrong.


www.guardian.co.uk...





new topics

top topics
 
2
<< 1   >>

log in

join