reply to post by Kaytagg
hehe Kaytagg I fully inderstand your veiwpoint and you make some very cogent points that are made to me by very intelligent people in my life all the
It boggles me aswell. But the thing is, I, and other people whove taken a glimpse at the subject, read the words strait from the mouth of the horse.
And this peticular crazy, pale horse cannot shut up about killing *at least* half of the current population. The debate among them is not if, but
They can put it far more eloquently than i can:
“Malthus has been vindicated; reality is finally catching up with Malthus. The Third World is overpopulated, it’s an economic mess, and there’s
no way they could get out of it with this fast-growing population. Our philosophy is: back to the village.”
Dr. Arne Schiotz, World Wildlife Fund Director of Conservation, stated such, ironically, in 1984:
“A total world population of 250-300 million people, a 95% decline from present levels, would be ideal.”
Ted Turner, in an interview with Audubon magazine
“There is a single theme behind all our work–we must reduce population levels. Either governments do it our way, through nice clean methods, or
they will get the kinds of mess that we have in El Salvador, or in Iran or in Beirut. Population is a political problem. Once population is out of
control, it requires authoritarian government, even fascism, to reduce it….” “Our program in El Salvador didn’t work. The infrastructure was
not there to support it. There were just too goddamned many people…. To really reduce population, quickly, you have to pull all the males into the
fighting and you have to kill significant numbers of fertile age females….” The quickest way to reduce population is through famine, like in
Africa, or through disease like the Black Death….
Thomas Ferguson, State Department Office of Population Affairs
hit *reply accidentally cont,
“In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the
like would fit the bill…. But in designating them as the enemy, we fall into the trap of mistaking symptoms for causes. All these dangers are caused
by human intervention and it is only through changed attitudes and behavior that they can be overcome. The real enemy, then, is humanity itself.”
Alexander King, Bertrand Schneider – Founder and Secretary, respectively, The Club of Rome, The First Global Revolution, pgs 104-105, 1991
A cancer is an uncontrolled multiplication of cells; the population explosion is an uncontrolled multiplication of people…. We must shift our
efforts from the treatment of the symptoms to the cutting out of the cancer. The operation will demand many apparently brutal and heartless
Stanford Professor ” Paul Ehrlich in The Population Bomb
^ cowrote 'Ecoscience' with current whitehouse resident superstar depopulationist, Johm Holdren
“In order to stabilize world population, we must eliminate 350,000 people per day. It is a horrible thing to say, but it is just as bad not to say
J. Cousteau, 1991 explorer and UNESCO courier
^Cousteau!? Say it aint so!
“We must speak more clearly about sexuality, contraception, about abortion, about values that control population, because the ecological crisis, in
short, is the population crisis. Cut the population by 90% and there aren’t enough people left to do a great deal of ecological damage.”
Depopulation should be the highest priority of foreign policy towards the third world, because the US economy will require large and increasing
amounts of minerals from abroad, especially from less developed countries”.
Dr. Henry Kissinger
“World population needs to be decreased by 50%”
Dr. Henry Kissinger
“War and famine would not do. Instead, disease offered the most efficient and fastest way to kill the billions that must soon die if the population
crisis is to be solved. AIDS is not an efficient killer because it is too slow. My favorite candidate for eliminating 90 percent of the world’s
population is airborne Ebola (Ebola Reston), because it is both highly lethal and it kills in days, instead of years. “We’ve got airborne diseases
with 90 percent mortality in humans. Killing humans. Think about that. “You know, the bird flu’s good, too. For everyone who survives, he will
have to bury nine”
Dr. Eric Pianka University of Texas evolutionary ecologist and lizard expert, showed solutions for reducing the world’s population to an audience on
“The present vast overpopulation, now far beyond the world carrying capacity, cannot be answered by future reductions in the birth rate due to
contraception, sterilization and abortion, but must be met in the present by the reduction of numbers presently existing. This must be done by
whatever means necessary.”
Initiative for the United Nations ECO-92 EARTH CHARTER
So the question becomes, why do *they* want population control, not why *I* think they should desire it to be so.
My best answer why the talk about depopulation non stop in their declassified documents, white papers and officil text? BECAUSE THEYRE F00Kin CRAZY
MAN~ And thats the best I can come up with. My mind cannot fathom the desire to kill 1 out of every 10 people I see. The above quoted genetlemen
seem to have no problem with the math.
So take them quotes and run, perhaps you can prove to me that eugenics died with Hitler, and perhaps I'll be able to sleep better.
Why now? Why not rely on their old status quo tricks to keep all 7 bill ion line?
Because they fear us deeply, and realize if they allow this awakening (which is surly occuring or you and i wouldnt be discussing such things)to take
place among an informed and unafraid populace, those numbers would be an unstoppable force against their machinations. Perhaps they know the only way
the can ever assure their everlasting dominance is to utterly destroy and enslave their worst enemy - us, the friggin normal people?! Before we wake
I dont know man! But read their own words and judge for yourself.
[edit on 26-9-2009 by Neo_Serf]
edit again for all sorts of drunken errors. missed a ton still no doubt.
[edit on 26-9-2009 by Neo_Serf]