I read this yesterday and if you look at the year this session was, 1981, and what Ra says there seems to be a correlation with the date 2012. Anyone else see this? Any thoughts?

from: The Law of One, Book I, Session 6, January 24, 1981


"Questioner: I think that it would be appropriate to discover how the Law of
One acts in this transfer of beings to our planet and the action of harvest?

Ra: I am Ra. The Law of One states simply that all things are one, that all
beings are one. There are certain behaviors and thought-forms consonant
with the understanding and practice of this law. Those who, finishing a
cycle of experience, demonstrate grades of distortion of that understanding
of thought and action will be separated by their own choice into the
vibratory distortion most comfortable to their mind/body/spirit complexes.
This process is guarded or watched by those nurturing beings who, being
very close to the Law of One in their distortions, nevertheless, move
towards active service.

Thus, the illusion is created of light, or more properly but less
understandably, light/love. This is in varying degrees of intensity. The spirit
complex of each harvested entity moves along the line of light until the light
grows too glaring, at which time the entity stops. This entity may have
barely reached third density or may be very, very close to the ending of the
third-density light/love distortion vibratory complex. Nevertheless, those
who fall within this octave of intensifying light/love then experience a major
cycle during which there are opportunities for the discovery of the
distortions which are inherent in each entity and, therefore, the lessening of
these distortions.

Questioner: What is the length, in our years, of one of these cycles?

Ra: I am Ra. One major cycle is approximately 25,000 of your years. There
are three cycles of this nature during which those who have progressed may
be harvested at the end of three major cycles. That is, approximately
between 75 and 76,000 of your years. All are harvested regardless of their
progress, for during that time the planet itself has moved through the useful
part of that dimension and begins to cease being useful for the lower levels
of vibration within that density.

Questioner: What is the position of this planet with respect to the
progression of cycles at this time?

Ra: I am Ra. This sphere is at this time in fourth-dimension vibration. Its
material is quite confused due to the society memory complexes embedded
in its consciousness. It has not made an easy transition to the vibrations
which beckon. Therefore, it will be fetched with some inconvenience.

Questioner: Is this inconvenience imminent within a few years?

Ra: I am Ra. This inconvenience, or disharmonious vibratory complex, has
begun several of your years in your past. It shall continue unabated for a
period of approximately thirty of your years.

Questioner: After this period of thirty years I am assuming that this will be
a fourth-density planet. Is this correct?

Ra: I am Ra. This is so."

I suggest that ra is quite nice , but has not seen into the depths of the nature of void.

that cold emotionless place where order is not.

with out an understanding of love... it is a meanless word with out meaning beyond what a child understands .

science and snuggly feelings have no greater claim on understanding , than a stone statue or a cook book .

ra may be a very nice man... but frankly... god laughs at the attempts at spiritual dogma , but takes seriously the child that seeks god in the shape of clouds , seeking meaning...

I have read a few chapters out of the Law of One. It has been said to be very a very accurate and deep channeling by many respectable physic's and channelers. It is very complex material that should be read slowly so you can understand it. Honestly it got way to complex for me to complete reading. Although it is a great compilation of channelings.

As for the 2012 part of it, I REALLY HOPE IT'S TRUE! Most channeler's say once we complete the cycle into 4th density that the world and its inhabitants will be 100x more harmonious than it is now. Also, once we graduate into 4th density, it will be safe enough for our space brothers/sisters to come visit us! What a glorious day that would be, I can't barely even begin to imagine what kind of ecstasy I would experience meeting an ET!!! Keeps my hope up!

2012 FTW

Omni

the flaw in the rule of one , is the pattern .
mathmatic pattern / curve fitting : this is concept is based in 'I Ching' and historic event fitting. if you follow the data , transformation is not the only outcome that it may be predicting .

underlying pattern , and reflective fractal in micro-median , median-macro ... can have other outcomes and I reject ra's suggested conclusions .

Originally posted by readerone
the flaw in the rule of one , is the pattern .
mathmatic pattern / curve fitting : this is concept is based in 'I Ching' and historic event fitting. if you follow the data , transformation is not the only outcome that it may be predicting .

underlying pattern , and reflective fractal in micro-median , median-macro ... can have other outcomes and I reject ra's suggested conclusions .

Can you elaborate on this further please? you speak of things like mirco-median and median-macro or reflective fractals, never heard of them! =)

Hi, Ra fans !

I have read all the books of the Ra material, SLOWLY, and
what I like about them, is that it is a religious person, Carla,
that channels Ra, and there is NO religion in the messages ! !

We MUST NOT mix religion with the Ra material,
it WILL RUIN everything ! !

And, also, I like the fact that she/he/they, Carla/Ra/complex, talk about 2012,
so far from the past, and this, WITHOUT doom and gloom ! ! !

I guess I don't have to show URLs, for Carla's site, and the
new forum site, for mature members ? If needed, U2U/PM me.

Blue skies.

The Law of One material is quite fantastic, I really need to find the time to sift through it all. It is just so much to read. Thanks for posting this, everything else I've read from it makes quite a bit of sense to me.

I think it remarkable , only because it is so unremarkable simple .

its power is in the plain simplicity of its truth...

what is missing ... what happens when the time line/ pattern ends .

its logic is only flaw'd in conclusion , not in concept .