It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by grover
The article goes on to point out that:
The explanation is simple. The great consumer retreat from the market is being offset by government’s advance into the market. Consumer debt is way down from its peak in 2006; government debt is way up. Consumer spending is down, government spending is up. Why have new housing starts begun? Because the Fed is buying up Fannie and Freddie’s paper, and government-owned Fannie and Freddie are now just about the only mortgage games remaining in play.
Why are health care stocks booming? Because the government is about to expand coverage to tens of millions more Americans, and the White House has assured Big Pharma and health insurers that their profits will soar. Why are auto sales up? Because the cash-for-clunkers program has been subsidizing new car sales. Why is the financial sector surging? Because the Fed is keeping interest rates near zero, and the rest of the government is still guaranteeing any bank too big to fail will be bailed out. Why are federal contractors doing so well? Because the stimulus has kicked in.
In other words, the Dow is up despite the biggest consumer retreat from the market since the Great Depression because of the very thing so many executives are complaining about, which is government’s expansion. And regardless of what you call it – Keynesianism, socialism, or just pragmatism – it’s doing wonders for business, especially big business and Wall Street. Consumer spending is falling back to 60 to 65 percent of the economy, as government spending expands to fill the gap.
The problem is, our newly expanded government isn't doing much for average working Americans who continue to lose their jobs and whose belts continue to tighten, and who are getting almost nothing out of the rising Dow because they own few if any shares of stock. Despite the happy Dow and notwithstanding the upbeat corporate earnings, most corporations are still shedding workers and slashing payrolls. And the big banks still aren't lending to Main Street.
Trickle-down economics didn't work when the supply-siders were in charge. And it's not working now, at a time when -- despite all their cries of "socialism" -- big business and Wall Street are more politically potent than ever.
So much for Obama's policies are bad for business and is turning America socialist. In reality capitalism is having a feeding frenzy at our expense...so what else is new?
I can't think of a better example of the fact that the stock market is not a good or fair indicator of the national economy...that it has lost all connection with the you and me aspect of the economy.
The fat cats are getting fatter and you and me have to tighten our belts.
www.a lternet.org
(visit the link for the full news article)
Originally posted by OBE1
/e265966194f1.jpg[/atsimg]
Stocks aren't rising in real terms , rather , the $USD is declining. Nominal stock gains are simply a reflection of the decline in $USD purchasing power.
Consumer Confidence Largest Six-Month Gain in 15 Years
Mark J. Perry|Sep 25, 2009, 6:14 PM|
NEW YORK (Reuters) - U.S. consumer sentiment rose in late September to the highest... Read »
Originally posted by grover
reply to post by johnny2127
Ya know I am what I call a chronic liberal but I also agree with you more often than not...you post thoughtful and intelligent comments that even when I disagree with you I can respect...
See my signature.
Originally posted by venividivici
Originally posted by OBE1
/e265966194f1.jpg[/atsimg]
Stocks aren't rising in real terms , rather , the $USD is declining. Nominal stock gains are simply a reflection of the decline in $USD purchasing power.
Good point. I haven't thought of that.
So say for example. If XYZ stock has risen 8% year over year then that is due to the USD decline by 8% for the same period. That seems easy enough to confirm.
Thanks
[edit on 26-9-2009 by venividivici]
Originally posted by OBE1
reply to post by GreenBicMan
Review the historical relationship between currency devaluations and rising stock values. For a stark example , you might start with Zimbabwe.