posted on Sep, 26 2009 @ 12:22 PM
Welcome to page 21, where the discussion is still about their uniform.
WHY DOES IT MATTER?
I've seen two arguments about this and I'll respond to both scenarios...
1. It was real, they really did snatch a kid off the street in daylight, reminiscent of Nazi Germany or any other tyrannical regime over the
centuries. This is shown by the fact that "they" then drove through Police lines.
What does this say about America now? It says the constitution is dead, any one of you can be kidnapped and taken by your government (which, BTW, they
have already stated on record is the case, internationally), the people you pay to represent and protect you. Your Police and Military have over
stepped their boundaries and are acting against the constitution, human rights, international law...
2. It was a ploy to scare the people, those in cammo gear were working with select people in the crowd to give the impression of what we've seen.
What does this mean? It means that your Military and Police are deliberately trying to give the impression that your constitution is dead, that they
won't support it, that they are willing and able to kidnap their own citizens and act against international law, human rights and the
So which is better?
They both amount to the same thing whether this was a psychological tactic or not.
We have ascertained that those men were working with the authorities, we have not confirmed whether the protesters arrested (?) or kidnapped were
genuine protesters or paid to be "victims". But regardless, this is your Police (at least) trying to scare the people, showing what they can and
It no longer matters who they were or whether those taken were working with them. It all amounts to the same thing.